Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
143 results for 'Weil/////// industry:"Hardware"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
October 21, 2015 | The Recorder
SAN FRANCISCO — An army of lawyers came together to pull off two megadeals on Wednesday in the chip-making sector, both valued at more than $10 billion. The deals follow a trend of
1 minute read
October 5, 2015 | Legaltech News
Several recent surveys of attorneys bear out how most of us feel about technology: we all know that utilization of advances in electronic information systems is key to efficiency, and ultim
1 minute read
October 1, 2015 | The Recorder
SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Latham and Skadden help seal $811 million sale of EZchip to Mellanox Latham & Watkins represented computer hardware manufacturer Mellanox
1 minute read
October 1, 2015 | The Recorder
A round-up of transactions involving Bay Area lawyers and companies.
1 minute read
September 1, 2015 |
Click Here for FC&S Legal Expert Analysis Fluor Corp.v.Superior Court2015 WL 4938295Supreme Court of California.FLUOR CORPORATION, Petitioner,v.The…
1 minute read
Publication Date: 2015-08-20
Practice Area:
Industry:
Date Filed: 2015-08-20
Court: Ca. Sup. Ct.
Judge:
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Latham & Watkins, G. Andrew Lundberg, Brook B. Roberts and John M. Wilson for Petitioner.
for defendant: No appearance for Respondent.
Horvitz & Levy, Jason R. Litt, John A. Taylor, Jr.; Gaims, Weil, West & Epstein, Alan Jay Weil, Jeffrey B. Ellis; Shipman & Goodwin, James P. Ruggeri and Joshua D. Weinberg for Real Party in Interest.
Case Number: No: S205889
Cite as 14 C.D.O.S. 9263 FLUOR CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF ORANGE
July 28, 2015 | Legaltech News
Watson – the promising cognitive computing platform from IBM – has yet to engage many law firms, but looking ahead some of them may have little choice but to become an ad
1 minute read
Publication Date: 2015-07-02
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Judge: Before: Jacobs, Livingston, and Lohier, C.JJ.
Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Plaintiffs-Appellees: for the United States, Malcolm L. Stewart, Deputy Solicitor General, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, William J. Baer, Assistant Attorney General, Mark W. Ryan, Daniel McCuaig, Kristen C. Limarzi, Robert B. Nicholson, David Seidman, Finnuala K. Tessier, Lawrence B. Buterman, Attorneys, U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust Division, Washington, DC. For Plaintiff-States: George Jepsen, Attorney General of Connecticut, W. Joseph Nielsen, Assistant Attorney General, Office of Attorney General of Connecticut, Hartford, CT, Greg Abbott, Attorney General of Texas, Daniel T. Hodge, First Assistant Attorney General of Texas, John Scott, Deputy Attorney General of Texas, Jonathan F. Mitchell, Solicitor General of Texas, Andrew Oldham, Deputy Solicitor General of Texas, John T. Prud'homme, Kim van Winkle, Eric Lipman, Assistant Attorneys General, Office of Attorney General of Texas, Austin, TX. For the State of New York: Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General of the State of New York, Won S. Chin, Assistant Solicitor General, Office of Attorney General of New York, New York, NY.
for defendant: For Defendants-Appellants: for Apple, Inc: Theodore J. Boutros, Jr., Daniel G. Swanson, Blaine H. Evanson, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Los Angeles, CA, Cynthia E. Richman, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Washington, DC, Orin S. Snyder, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, New York, NY. For Verlagsgruppe Georg von Holtzbrinck GmbH, Holtzbrinck Publishers, LLC, d/b/a Macmillan: Eamon P. Joyce, Joel M. Mitnick, Mark D. Taticchi, Sidley Austin LLP, New York, NY. For Simon & Schuster, Inc. and Simon & Schuster Digital Sales, Inc: Gregory Silbert, Yehuda L. Buchweitz, Weil, James W. Quinn, Gotshal & Manges LLP, New York, NY.
Case Number: 13-3741-cv
Cite as: USA v. Apple, Inc., 13-3741-cv, NYLJ 1202731055527, at *1 (2d Cir., Decided June 30, 2015) Case Name United Stat
June 29, 2015 | Connecticut Law Tribune
Two years ago, Connecticut beefed up its law governing the regulation of so-called electronic waste. To offset the cost of Connecticut municipalities and transfer stations handling old telev
1 minute read
June 29, 2015 | Connecticut Law Tribune
Two years ago, Connecticut beefed up its law governing the regulation of so-called electronic waste. To offset the cost of Connecticut municipalities and transfer stations handling old television sets and other electronic devices, the state charges manufacturers a recycling fee.
1 minute read
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
