Filter This View

  • March 1, 2004 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Biennial Report of the Supreme Court Committee on the Tax Court

    Supreme Court of New Jersey INTRODUCTION I. RULE AMENDMENTS RECOMMENDED FOR ADOPTION Proposed Amendment to R. 8:3-1 - Separate Complaints for Different Tax Years b

    1 minute read

  • Paula Forrest v Jewish Guild for the Blind

    Publication Date: 2004-10-26
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: New York State Court of Appeals
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 129

    Decided on October 26, 2004 No. 129 [*1]Paula Forrest, Appellant, v Jewish Guild for the Blind, et al., Respondents.

  • United States ex rel Vuyyuru v. Jadhav

    Publication Date: 2009-02-18
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2009-02-12
    Court: 4th Cir.
    Judge: Hamilton, Senior Circuit Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Attorney for appellant: David Chizewer, Goldberg, Kohn, Bell, Black, Rosenbloom & Moritz, Chicago.
    for defendant: Attorney for appellees: John Boland, McGuireWoods, Richmond, Va.; Michael Shebelskie, Hunton & Williams, Richmond, Va.
    Case Number: Nos. 07-1455, 07-1922

    PUBLISHEDArgued: October 27, 2008Before KING, Circuit Judge, HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge, and Martin K. REIDINGER, United States District Judge for the Western District of North Carolina, sit

  • Allstate Insurance Co. v. Valley Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation PC, 05-5934

    Publication Date: 2007-02-27
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Eastern District of New York
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    Judge Hurley District Judge Denis R. Hurley ALLSTATE INSURA NCE CO. v. VALLEY PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION PC, 05-5934— Appearances: McDonnell &

  • Jameson v. Desta

    Publication Date: 2013-04-29
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2013-04-29
    Court: C.A. 4th
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Barry S. Jameson, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant.
    for defendant: La Follette, Johnson, De Haas, Gesler & Ames, James J. Wallace II, Russell M. Mortyn and David J. Ozeran for Defendant and Respondent.
    Case Number: No. D060029

    Cite as 13 C.D.O.S. 4251BARRY S. JAMESON, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. TADDESE DESTA, Defe

  • January 1, 2013 | Corporate Counsel

    Deals & Suits

    SoftbankSprint NextelSome analysts speculated that Sprint Nextel Corporation would try to thwart the planned merger of T-Mobile USA and MetroPCS Co

    1 minute read

  • Satterfield v. Crown Cork & Seal Co., Inc.

    Publication Date: 2008-10-06
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2008-08-29
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 3
    Judge: Jan P. Patterson, Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NO. 03-04-00518-CV

    OPINIONThe issue presented is whether a statute that extinguishes a litigant's right to pursue an accrued and pending common law cause of action--without providing a grace period--transcends the le

  • In re Martinez

    Publication Date: 2012-10-30
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-10-26
    Court: C.A. 4th
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Law Office of Ken I. Karan and Ken I. Karan for Petitioner.
    for defendant: Kamala D. Harris, Attorney General, Jennifer A. Neill, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Phillip Lindsay and Michael Rhoads, Deputy Attorneys General, for Respondent.
    Case Number: No. D061287

    Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 12248In re STEVEN C. MARTINEZ on Habeas Corpus.No. D061287In the Court of Appeal in

  • U.S. v. Southland Management Corp.

    Publication Date: 2002-04-15
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2002-04-11
    Court: 5th Cir.
    Judge: King, Chief Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 00-60267

    As amended April 12, 2002Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of MississippiPlaintiff-Appellant the United States of America ("the Government") brought the inst

  • National Association of Optometrists & Opticians v. Harris

    Publication Date: 2012-06-13
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-06-13
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge: Lawrence K. Karlton, Senior District Judge, Presiding Before: Procter Hug, Jr., Richard A. Paez, and Marsha S. Berzon, Circuit Judges.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Lois A. Schechter, Morrison & Foerster LLP, San Francisco, California, Deanne E. Maynard, Morrison & Foerster LLP, Washington, D.C., for the appellants.
    for defendant: Sherry L. Ledakis, Deputy Attorney General, San Diego, California, for the appellees.
    Case Number: No. 10-16233

    Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 6450 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF OPTOMETRISTS & OPTICIANS; LENSCRAFTERS, INC.; EYE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA, INC., Plaintiffs-Appella