Filter This View

  • Moore v. Altra Energy Technologies Inc.

    Publication Date: 2010-08-12
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-08-10
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 14
    Judge: Jeffrey V. Brown Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 14-08-00362-CV

    Reversed and Rendered in Part and Remanded in Part and Opinion filed August 10, 2010.OPINIONThis case was tried to a jury over allegations of common-law and statutory fraud, promissory estoppel,

  • Marin Real Estate Partners L.P. v. Vogt

    Publication Date: 2011-12-08
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-11-23
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 4
    Judge: Opinion by: Marialyn Barnard, Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 04-10-00602-CV

    OPINIONSitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice Marialyn Barnard, JusticeAFFIRMEDThis is an appeal from a judgment in favor of appellees John E. Vogt and N

  • June 1, 2010 | New York Law Journal

    Starr Foundation v. American International Group, Inc.

    Before: Gonzalez, P.J.; Friedman, Moskowitz, Renwick and Freedman, JJ. Decided: May 27; 601380/08 Schindler Cohen & Hochman LLP, New York (Rebecca L. Fine, Ste

    1 minute read

  • Energy Maintenance Services Group I LLC v. Sandt

    Publication Date: 2012-03-30
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-03-29
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 14
    Judge: Kem Thompson Frost Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NO. 14-09-00907-CV

    Affirmed as Modified and Opinion filed March 29, 2012.In The Fourteenth Court of AppealsOPINIONThis appeal arises out of a judgment based upon claims for statutory fraud

  • Wilson & Wilson v. City Council of Redwood City

    Publication Date: 2011-01-26
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-01-25
    Court: C.A. 1st
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: John J. Hartford; Hannig Law Firm and John H. Blake; Wilson & Wilson and Donald A. Wilson for Plaintiff and Respondent.
    for defendant: Kerr & Wagstaffe, James M. Wagstaffe and Maria Radwick; McDonough Holland & Allen PC, Iris P. Yang and Kara K. Ueda; Stanly T. Yamamoto, City Attorney for the City of Redwood City, for Defendants and Appellants.
    Case Number: No. A123480

    Cite as 11 C.D.O.S. 1172WILSON & WILSON, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. CITY COUNCIL OF REDWOOD CITY et al.,

  • XTO Energy Inc. v. Nikolai

    Publication Date: 2011-08-29
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-08-30
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 2
    Judge: Terrie Livingston Chief Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NO. 02-09-00299-CV

    OPINIONIn three issues, the appellants that are listed above, other than Leonard and Sandy Nikolai, argue that the trial court erred by denying their motions for summary judgment and by gr

  • Gilb v. Chiang

    Publication Date: 2010-07-06
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-07-02
    Court: C.A. 3rd
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: K. William Curtis, Warren C. Stracener, Linda A. Mayhew, Christopher E. Thomas for Plaintiffs and Respondents.
    for defendant: Kaye Scholer, Steven S. Rosenthal, Marc S. Cohen, Jay W. Waks, and Bryant Delgadillo; Richard J. Chivaro, Ronald V. Placet and Shawn D. Silva for Defendants and Appellants. Law Offices of Brooks Ellison and Patrick J. Whalen for California Attorneys, Administrative Law Judges, etc.; Paul E. Harris III, Brooke D. Pierman; Olson Hagel & Fishburn, Deborah B. Caplan, N. Eugene Hill and Richard C. Miadich for Service Employees International Union, Yvonne Walker, Pamela Handel, Tamekia Robinson and Kathleen Phillips; Carroll, Burdick & McDonough, Gary M. Messing, Gregg McLean Adam and Jonathan Yank, for California Correctional Peace Officers? Association and California Statewide Law Enforcement Association; Daniel M. Lindsay for California Correctional Peace Officers? Association; Kasey C. Clark for California Statewide Law Enforcement Association, Interveners and Appellants.
    Case Number:

    Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 8598DAVID A. GILB, as Director, etc. et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. JOHN CHI

  • Skilstaf, Inc. v. CVS Caremark Corp.

    Publication Date: 2012-02-09
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-02-09
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge: Susan Illston, District Judge, Presiding Before: Betty B. Fletcher and Sidney R. Thomas, Circuit Judges, and Lee H. Rosenthal, District Judge.*
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: R. Bryan McCulley, McCulley McCluer PLLC, Jacksonville, Florida, for the plaintiff-appellant.
    for defendant: Fred A. Kelly, Jr., Sarah E. Andre, Nixon Peabody LLP, Los Angeles, California, for defendants-appellees New Albertson?s. Inc. and Supervalu Inc. Gregory P. Stone, Michael R. Doyes, Carolyn H. Luedtke, Munger Tolles & Olson LLP, Los Angeles, California, for defendant-appellee Safeway Inc. Matt Oster, McDermott Will & Emery LLP, Los Angeles, California, for defendant-appellee Walgreen Co. Laurence A. Weiss, Kristi K. Elder, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Palo Alto, California, for defendant-appellee The Kroger Co. Steven H. Frankel, Sandra D. Hauser, Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal LLP, San Francisco, California, for defendant-appellee Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. Peter Buscemi, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, San Francisco, California, for defendant-appellee Rite Aid Corp. Tami S. Smason, Robert H. Griffith, Page R. Barnes, Foley & Lardner LLP, San Francisco, California, for defendants-appellees CVS Caremark Corp. and Longs Drugs Stores Corp.
    Case Number: No. 10-15338

    Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 1739 SKILSTAF, INC., on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. p cla

  • City of Cerritos v. Cerritos Taxpayers Association

    Publication Date: 2010-04-21
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-04-20
    Court: C.A. 2nd
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant: Timothy K. Quick for Defendant, Cross-complainant and Appellant Cerritos Taxpayers Association. C. Robert Ferguson for Defendant, Cross-complainant and Appellant United Community Alliance.
    Case Number: No. B214530

    Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 4938CITY OF CERRITOS et al., Plaintiffs, Cross-defendants and Respondents, v.CERRITOS

  • The Topps Company Inc. v. Cadbury Stani S.A.I.C., 99 Civ. 9437

    Publication Date: 2006-09-12
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2006-08-31
    Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District
    Judge: Charles Haight
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 99 Civ. 9437

    U.S. DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Judge Haight Defendant moves for partial summary judgment. Plaintiff resists the motion. This opinion decides it.