Filter This View

  • October 31, 2007 |

    Labor & Employment

    Multinational employers fight over top talent in India's mobile work force.

    1 minute read

  • Spence v. State

    Publication Date: 2003-09-19
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Adams, A. Harris
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Jackie G. Patterson, LaGrange, for appellant.
    for defendant: Louis J. Kirby, Solicitor, LaGrange, for appellee.
    Case Number: A03A1047

    The trial court should have quashed the charge of attempting to elude an officer where state did not allege in the accusation that defendant was eluding an officer or police vehicle when he failed

  • Wallick v. Period Homes Ltd.

    Publication Date: 2001-11-16
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Miller, M. Yvette
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Robert H. McKnight Jr. Freed & Berman PC, Atlanta, for appellant.
    for defendant: Charles A. Ratz Gray & Gilliland PC, Atlanta, and Mark B. Bullman Postic & Babb, Marietta, for appellee.
    Case Number: A01A0859

    Judicial estoppel did not bar plaintiff's claim that defendant breached a contract to buy a bankruptcy asset, even though he did not add the claim to his bankruptcy asset schedule, because the clai

  • Edmond v. Continental Ins. Co.

    Publication Date: 2001-05-11
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Doyle, John J.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Larry E. Stewart, Lawrenceville, for appellant.
    for defendant: . David H. Hanks Fulcher, Hagler, Reed, Hanks & Harper, Augusta, for appellees. Other party representation: Michael A. O'Quinn Barnhart, O'Quinn & Williams, McDonough.
    Case Number: A01A0226

    Any duty that defendant may have owed to the underlying plaintiffs fell within his insurance policy's business exclusion because such duty arose out of or in connection with his county emplo

  • Brandon v. Newman

    Publication Date: 2000-05-19
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Miller, M. Yvette
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Keith F. Brandon Zimmerman & Assocs., Atlanta, for appellant.
    for defendant: Samuel W. Cruse, Augusta, for appellee. Other party representation: Elizabeth McLeod Fulcher, Hagler, Reed, Hanks & Harper, Augusta.
    Case Number: A99A1776

    The plaintiff could not enforce his attorney's lien against the defendant's personal injury settlement because the underlying retainer agreement was inexplicably entwined with an unethical fee-split

  • Simmons v. Hill

    Publication Date: 2000-03-03
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Ruffin, John H.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Terry L. Miller and Gee G. Vaughn Mitchell & Mitchell, Dalton, for appellant.
    for defendant: . Robert A. Cowan Kinney, Kemp, Sponcler, Joiner & Tharpe, Dalton, for appellees.
    Case Number: A99A1939

    Father was not liable under the family purpose doctrine for his 18-year-old son's accident, even though the father owned the wrecked truck, since the son did not live with his parents at the time of

  • National Council on Compensation Ins. Inc. v. Strickland

    Publication Date: 2000-02-04
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Eldridge, Frank M.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: David C. Will Harman, Owen, Saunders & Sweeney PC, Atlanta, for appellant.
    for defendant: Kenneth A. Smith Smith, Wallis & Scott, Carrollton, for appellee. Other party representation: Michael T. Thornton, Atlanta.
    Case Number: A99A2184

    Evidence that administrator of Georgia's workers' compensation assigned risk plan changed plaintiff's insurance application without informing him raised a jury issue on whether the administrator act

  • June 26, 2012 | The Legal Intelligencer

    The Road to Recovery

    Arising four decades ago in response to the onslaught of asbestos-

    1 minute read

  • January 23, 2008 | The Legal Intelligencer

    Reed Smith grabs group from Anderson Kill

    Reed Smith said it will acquire 55 attorneys from 120-attorney Anderson Kill & Olick, effective Feb. 1.The rest of the attorneys will continue to operate under the Anderson Kill b

    1 minute read

  • August 15, 2008 | The Legal Intelligencer

    Reed Smith Responds to Ex-Client's Suit

    Reed Smith has denied any overstaffing or fee churning in an employment discrimination case it handled for a nonprofit client, according to a response it filed to a lawsuit the nonprofit

    1 minute read