Filter This View

  • September 10, 2009 | National Law Journal

    Policyholders Filing More Suspicious Claims -- or Are They?

    Could be another sign of the economy: More Americans are filing suspicious insurance claims this year, making allegedly bogus efforts to collect on everything from broken glass to car fires, ac

    1 minute read

  • Western Bldg. Restoration Co., Inc. v Lovell Safety Mgt. Co., LLC

    Publication Date: 2009-04-02
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, 3rd Dept
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 505610

    Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Third Judicial Department Decided and Entered: April 2, 2009 505610 WESTERN BU

  • United States Liability Ins. Co. v. Mountain Valley Indemnity Co.

    Publication Date: 2005-06-02
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Unknown
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    U.S. DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Judge Haight In this diversity action, plaintiffs United States Liability Insurance Co. ("U.S. Liability"), and Mobil

  • Ameron International Corporation v. Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania

    Publication Date: 2010-11-18
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-11-18
    Court: Ca. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Stanzler Funderburk & Castellon and Jordan S. Stanzler for Plaintiff and Appellant. Weston, Benshoof, Rochefort, Rubalcava & MacCuish and Richard Giller for The California Cast Metals Association as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Plaintiff and Appellant.
    for defendant: McCurdy & Fuller, Kevin G. McGurdy and Rosemary J. Springer for Defendant and Respondent Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania. Hinshaw & Culbertson, Robert J. Romero, Paul E. Vallone and Joseph J. De Hope, Jr., for Defendants and Respondents Century Indemnity Company, Insurance Company of North America, Pacific Employers Insurance Company, St. Paul Surplus Lines Insurance Company, Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania, Harbor Insurance Company and Transcontinental Insurance Company.. Charlston, Revich & Chamberlin, Charlston, Revich & Wollitz, Ira Revich and Nicholas R. Andrea for Defendants and Respondents International Insurance Company and Puritan Insurance Company. Burnham Brown, Thomas M. Downey, Tyler G. Olpin and James Y. Higa for Defendants and Respondents Transcontinental Insurance Company and Harbor Insurance Company. Ericksen, Arbuthnot, Kilduff, Day & Lindstrom and Andrew P. Sclar for Defendant and Respondent Old Republic Insurance Company. Hogan & Hartson, David R. Singer, Jonathan S. Franklin, William J. Bowman and Catherine E. Stetson for Defendant and Respondent Twin City Fire Insurance Company. Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal, Michael A. Barnes, Sonia Martin and Lee L. Kaster for Defendant and Respondent Great American Surplus Lines Insurance Company. O?Melveny & Myers, Richard B. Goetz and A. Patricia Klemic for Defendants and Respondents Insurance Company of North America and Pacific Employers Insurance Company. Foley & Lardner, Eileen R. Ridley and Patrick T. Wong for Lloyd?s and The Reinsurance Association of America as Amici Curiae on behalf of Defendants and Respondents. Wiley Rein, Laura A. Foggan; Sinnott, Dito, Moura & Puebla, Randolph P. Sinnott and John J. Moura for Complex Insurance Claims Litigation Association as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Defendants and Respondents. Sinnott, Dito, Moura & Puebla, Blaise S. Curet and Stephen R. Wong for Zurich American Insurance Company as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Defendants and Respondents.
    Case Number: No. S153852

    Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 14403AMERON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE

  • Brown v. Cassens Transport Co.

    Publication Date: 2008-10-28
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2008-10-23
    Court: 6th Cir.
    Judge: Karen Nelson Moore, Circuit Judge.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 05-2089

    RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206Argued: July 27, 2006Before: MOORE and GIBBONS, Circuit Judges; ACKERMAN, District Judge.*fn

  • Sea Trade Maritime Corp. v. Marsh USA, 602648/02

    Publication Date: 2013-10-23
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court, New York County, IAS Part Three
    Judge: Justice Eileen Bransten
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 602648/02

    Cite as: Sea Trade Maritime Corp. v. Marsh USA, 602648/02, NYLJ 1202624617787, at *1 (Sup., NY, Decided October 21, 2013) 602648/02 Justice Eileen

  • February 3, 2003 | Legal Times

    It's Not the Economy

    Almost across the board, Washington's largest law firms report making as many partners, or more, in 2002 as they did in 2001 -- and that the struggling economy was not a major factor in

    1 minute read

  • February 13, 2006 | Legal Times

    Taking the President's Case to Congress

    These days lobbying Congress is a tricky affair. Partisan rancor has reached a fever pitch, lobbying reform is the topic du jour, and members are wary of lurking scandal.And that

    1 minute read

  • February 9, 2010 | National Law Journal

    Top Firm Leaders Discuss How to Win the Battle for Lateral Partners

    On Dec. 14, National Law Journal editor in chief David Brown discussed the current state of the lateral market with Lynn Mestel, one of the nation's most prominent legal recruiters, an

    1 minute read

  • February 15, 2011 | The Legal Intelligencer

    The Legal's Top Lateral Hires of 2010

    The Pennsylvania lateral market was far from robust in 2010, making the compilation of 10 prominent moves somewhat of a difficult task. But no matter how few and far between they are, there are alw

    1 minute read