Filter This View

  • July 27, 2010 | The Legal Intelligencer

    Intellectual Property Directory - Pennsylvania Listings

    Intellectual Property Directory Pennsylvania Daniel C. Abeles Partner Eckert Seamans Ch

    1 minute read

  • Azusa Land Partners v. Department of Industrial Relations

    Publication Date: 2010-12-21
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-12-21
    Court: C.A. 2nd
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis, Patrick A. Perry and Nancy�S. Fong for Plaintiff and Appellant. Paskerian Block Martindale & Brinton, Robin C. Martindale and Caleb J. Brinton IV for Rancho Mission Viejo as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Plaintiff and Appellant. Cox, Castle & Nicholson, John S. Miller, Jr. and Dwayne P. McKenzie for California Building Industry Association as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Plaintiff and Appellant.
    for defendant: Vanessa L. Holton, Anthony Mischel and Christopher Jagard for Defendant and Respondent.
    Case Number: No. B218275

    Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 15761AZUSA LAND PARTNERS, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, D

  • July 28, 2003 | Texas Lawyer

    Lawyer Life After Lawrence

    Like any proud parent, Mitchell Katine likes to show off his family, as evidenced by the photo he displays prominently on the credenza in his office. It's a common portrait of Americana: a sna

    1 minute read

  • January 25, 2010 | New York Law Journal

    Handschu v. Police Department of the City of New York

    Judge Charles S. Haight Jr. Decided: Jan. 19, 2010 This civil rights action against the New York City Police Department ("NYPD"), complaining about certain surveillance and

    1 minute read

  • Tibble v. Edison International

    Publication Date: 2013-03-21
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2013-03-21
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge: Before: Alfred T. Goodwin, and Diarmuid F. O'Scannlain, Circuit Judges, and Jack Zouhary, District Judge.*
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Michael A. Wolff (argued), Jerome J. Schlichter, Nelson G. Wolff, and Jason P. Kelly, Schlichter, Bogard & Denton, LLP, St. Louis, Missouri, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.
    for defendant: Jonathan D. Hacker (argued), Walter Dellinger, Robert N. Eccles, and Gary S. Tell, O'Melveny & Myers LLP, Washington, D.C.; Matthew Eastus and China Rosas, O'Melveny & Myers LLP, Los Angeles, California, for Defendants-Appellees/Cross-Appellants. Elizabeth Hopkins (argued), Stacey E. Elias, M. Patricia Smith, and Timothy D. Hauser, United States Department of Labor, Washington, D.C., for amicus curiae Secretary of Labor. Jay E. Sushelsky and Melvin Radowitz, AARP Foundation Litigation, Washington, D.C., for amicus curiae AARP. Nicole A. Diller, Alison B. Willard, and Abbey M. Glenn, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, San Francisco, California, for amicus curiae California Employment Law Council. Thomas L. Cubbage III, and S. Michael Chittenden, Covington & Burling LLP, Washington, D.C., for amicus curiae Investment Company Institute.
    Case Number: No. 10-56406

    Cite as 13 C.D.O.S. 3138GLENN TI

  • February 28, 2005 | Texas Lawyer

    Inadmissible

    Claims Settle Several former Texas-based partners in the defunct Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison have agreed to pay to settle claims the firm's bankruptcy trustee lodged against

    1 minute read

  • Roe 58 v. Doe 1

    Publication Date: 2011-01-21
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-01-20
    Court: C.A. 2nd
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Zalkin & Zimmer, Irwin M. Zalkin and Devin M. Storey; The Senators Law Firm and Joseph L. Dunn for Plaintiffs and Appellants.
    for defendant: Stokes Roberts & Wagner, Maria C. Roberts, Shirley A. Gauvin, Christina Yates; Hennigan, Bennett & Dorman and Lee W. Potts for Defendants and Respondents Doe 1, Doe 4 and Doe 5. Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, John A. Karaczynski and Rex S. Heinke for Defendant and Respondent Doe 2. Murchison & Cumming, Michael B. Lawler and Edmund G. Farrell III for Defendant and Respondent Doe 3.
    Case Number: No. B215948

    Cite as 11 C.D.O.S. 945JOHN ROE 58 et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. DEFENDANT DOE 1 et al., Defendants and

  • September 28, 2009 | New Jersey Law Journal

    2009 Ineligible List

    Attorney Ineligibility Order Pursuant to Rule 1:28-2(a) SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY Pursuant to Rule 1:28-2, the Trustees of the New Jersey Lawyers' Fund for Client Protection (Fund

    1 minute read

  • May 1, 2004 | Corporate Counsel

    The Third Way

    It looked like a done deal. In the summer of 2002, the senior executives of London's Benfield Group Plc, the world's largest reinsurance brokerage firm, prepared to take their business public.

    1 minute read

  • NetJets Aviation, Inc. v. LHC Communications, LLC

    Publication Date: 2008-08-12
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2008-08-08
    Court: 2nd Cir.
    Judge: Kearse, Circuit Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 06-3340-cv

    Argued: January 15, 2008Before: KEARSE, LEVAL, and CABRANES, Circuit Judges.Plaintiffs NetJets Aviation, Inc., and NetJets Sales, Inc. (collectively "NetJets"), appeal from so much of a judgment