Search Results

State v. Koskovich

Publication Date: 2001-06-13
Practice Area:
Industry:
Date Filed: 2001-06-07
Court: N.J. Sup. Ct.
Judge: Verniero, J.
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: A-22 September T

ON APPEAL FROM Judgment of Conviction and Sentence of Death in the Superior Court, Law Division, Sussex CountyChief Justice Poritz PRESIDINGOPINION BY Justice VernieroCONCURRING OPINION BY Ju

Marathon Corp. v. Pitzner

Publication Date: 2001-09-28
Practice Area:
Industry:
Date Filed: 2001-08-02
Court: Tex. App. Dist. 13
Judge: Justice Hinojosa
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: NUMBER 13-98-098

On appeal from the 370th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas.OPINIONJohn C. Pitzner ("Pitzner"), a Dallas County resident, was working for Professional Employers Group, Inc. ("PEG"), a Texas

April 1, 2008 | New York Law Journal

In Re: World Trade Center Disaster Site Litigation

Decided March 26, 2008Before Newman, Sotomayor, and Wesley, C. JJ.Interlocutory appeal from an order of the Southern District of New York (Hellerstein, J.), entered on October 18,

1 minute read

Satterfield v. Crown Cork & Seal Company, Inc.

Publication Date: 2008-09-02
Practice Area:
Industry:
Date Filed: 2008-08-29
Court: Tex. App. Dist. 3
Judge: Jan P. Patterson, Justice
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 03-04-00518-CV

OPINIONThe issue presented is whether a statute that extinguishes a litigant's right to pursue an accrued and pending common law cause of action--without providing a grace period--transcends the le

Biro v. Nast, 11 Civ. 4442 (JPO)

Publication Date: 2012-09-13
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District
Judge: District Judge J. Paul Oetken
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 11 Civ. 4442 (JPO)

Cite as: Biro v. Nast, 11 Civ. 4442 (JPO), NYLJ 1202571238680, at *1 (SDNY, Decided August 10, 2012)District Judge J. Paul Oetkena

Tibble v. Edison International

Publication Date: 2013-08-01
Practice Area:
Industry:
Date Filed: 2013-03-21
Court: 9th Cir.
Judge: Stephen V. Wilson, District Judge, Presiding Before: Alfred T. Goodwin, and Diarmuid F. O'Scannlain, Circuit Judges, and Jack Zouhary, District Judge.*
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Michael A. Wolff, Schlichter, Bogard & Denton, LLP, St. Louis, MO, argued the cause and filed the briefs for the plaintiffs-appellants. With him on the briefs were Jerome J. Schlichter, Nelson G. Wolff, and Jason P. Kelly, Schlichter, Bogard & Denton, LLP, St. Louis, MO. Elizabeth Hopkins, U.S. Department of Labor, Washington, DC, argued the cause and filed the brief for the Secretary of Labor as amicus curiae in support of plaintiffs-appellants. With her on the brief were Stacey E. Elias, M. Patricia Smith, and Timothy D. Hauser. Jay E. Sushelsky, AARP Foundation Litigation, Washington, DC, filed the brief for the AARP as amicus curiae in support of plaintiffs-appellants. With him on the brief was Melvin Radowitz, AARP, Washington, D.C.
for defendant: Jonathan D. Hacker, O'Melveny & Myers LLP, Washington, DC, argued the cause and filed the briefs for the defendants-­appellees/cross-appellants. With him on the briefs were Walter Dellinger, Robert N. Eccles, Gary S. Tell, O'Melveny & Myers LLP, Washington, D.C., as well as Matthew Eastus, and China Rosas, O'Melveny & Myers LLP, Los Angeles, CA. Nicole A. Diller, Alison B. Willard, and Abbey M. Glenn, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, San Francisco, CA, filed the brief for the California Employment Law Council as amicus curiae in support of defendants-appellees/cross-appellants. Thomas L. Cubbage III, Covington & Burling LLP, Washington, DC, filed the brief for the Investment Company Institute as amicus curiae in support of defendants-­appellees/cross-appellants. With him on the brief was S. Michael Chittenden, Covington & Burling LLP, Washington, DC.
Case Number: No. 10-56406 No. 10-56415

Cite as 13 C.D.O.S. 8241 GLENN TIBBLE; WILLIAM BAUER; WILLIAM IZRAL; HENRY RUNOWIECKI; FREDERICK SUHADOLC; HUGH TINMAN, JR., as representatives of a c

Sonnier v. Crain

Publication Date: 2010-07-30
Practice Area:
Industry:
Date Filed: 2010-07-27
Court: 5th Cir.
Judge: W. Eugene Davis, Circuit Judge
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 09-30186

Before GARWOOD, DAVIS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.The appellant Jeremy Sonnier challenges the denial of a preliminary injunction seeking to enjoin enforcement of the speech policy regulating the ti

Federal Trade Commission, Plaintiff-Appellee Bronson Partners, LLC, d/b/a New England Diet CTR, d/b/a/ Bronson Day Spa; Martin Howard; and H&H Marketing, LLC, Defendants-Appellants, Sandra Howard, Defendant*, 10-0878-cv

Publication Date: 2011-08-25
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Judge: Before: Calabresi, Wesley, and Lynch, C. JJ.
Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Plaintiff-Appellee: Lawrence Demille-Wagman, Federal Trade Commission, Washington, DC (Willard K. Tom, John F. Daly, on the brief) (Robin E. Eichen, Nur-ul-Haq, Federal Trade Commission, New York, NY, of counsel)
for defendant: For Defendants-Appellants: Steven P. Caley, Kelley Drye & Warren LLP, New York, NY (Lewis M. Rose, Daniel S. Blynn, Damon W. Suden, on the brief)
Case Number: 10-0878-cv

Cite as: FTC v. Bronson Partners, LLC, 10-0878-cv, NYLJ 1202512259207, at *1 (2d Cir., Decided August 19, 2011)Before: Calabresi, Wesley, and Lynch,

March 6, 2007 | The American Lawyer

Will the Corporate Model Backfire on Greenberg?

In the course of a decade, Greenberg Traurig has had the kind of growth usually reserved for businesses that sell oil or iPods. Revenues are up by more than 880 percent from 1996, and in 2006 they

1 minute read

Gloria L. Rodas v. Plaintiff-Appellant

Publication Date: 2011-09-03
Practice Area:
Industry:
Date Filed: 2011-08-31
Court: 7th Cir.
Judge: Flaum, Circuit Judge.
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 09-3760

ARGUED JUNE 10, 2011Before BAUER, FLAUMand WILLIAMS,Circuit Judges.Gloria Rodas's appeal presents an important question about the meaning of a provision of the Illinois Good Samaritan Act,