Filter This View

  • Jim*nez v. Rodriguez-Pagan

    Publication Date: 2010-03-08
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-03-01
    Court: 1st Cir.
    Judge: Howard, Circuit Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 09-1135

    Before Torruella, Lipez and Howard, Circuit Judges.This case calls on us to navigate the turbulent waters of Colorado River abstention. That doctrine, established in Colorado River Water Conservati

  • April 25, 2001 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Daily Decision Alert: Vol. 9, No. 78 -- April 25, 2001

    STATE COURT CASESADMINISTRATIVE LAW AND PROCEDURE -- RACING01-2-6811 N.J. Racing Commission v. Baker, et al., App. Div. (per curiam) (3 pp.) Appellant was appropriately fined $

    1 minute read

  • United States v. Lucido

    Publication Date: 2011-01-01
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-07-28
    Court: 6th Cir.
    Judge: Sutton, Circuit Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: Nos. 09-1410/1412

    RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206Argued: June 10, 2010Before: BATCHELDER, Chief Judge; SUTTON and KETHLEDGE, Circuit Judges.SUTTON, J., delivered the op

  • Penn Allegh Coal Co. v. Holland

    Publication Date: 1999-08-20
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 1999-08-20
    Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circ
    Judge: Edwards, Chief Judge, Rogers, Circuit Judge, and Buckley, Senior Circuit Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: E. Preston Rutledge
    for defendant: Peter Buscemi
    Case Number: No. 98-7161

    The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion. Opinion for the court filed by Senior Judge Buckley. Buckley, Senior Judge: The trustees of a heal

  • Motorola Credit Corp. v. Uzan

    Publication Date: 2009-05-11
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2009-03-31
    Court: 2nd Cir.
    Judge: JOSÉ A. Cabranes, Circuit Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 07-2076-cv

    Argued: February 9, 2009Before: CABRANES, WESLEY, Circuit Judges, and KORMAN, District Judge.*fn2The principal question in this appeal is whether a judgment for

  • Fashakin v. Nextel Communications, 05-CV-3080

    Publication Date: 2009-04-06
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2009-03-25
    Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District
    Judge: Roslynn Mauskopf
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 05-CV-3080

    District Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf U.S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Judge Mauskopf MEMORANDUM & ORDER Plaintiff Janet Fashak

  • Burkey v. Marberry

    Publication Date: 2009-02-23
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2009-02-18
    Court: 3rd Cir.
    Judge: Rendell, Circuit Judge.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 07-4782

    PRECEDENTIALArgued on November 20, 2008Before: SCIRICA, Chief Judge, RENDELL, Circuit Judge, and O'CONNOR,*fn1 Retired U.S. Supreme Court Justice.OPINION OF

  • September 17, 2008 | Corporate Counsel

    The power of one

    On a crisp sunny day in late March, lawyers from 39 law firms gathered at the corporate headquarters of Pfizer Inc., a nondescript office building a couple of blocks east of Grand Central Sta

    1 minute read

  • Lewis v. City of Chicago

    Publication Date: 2008-06-16
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2008-06-04
    Court: 7th Cir.
    Judge: Posner, Circuit Judge.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 07-2052

    ARGUED FEBRUARY 22, 2008Before EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge, and BAUER and POSNER, Circuit Judges.In 1995, the City of Chicago administered a new written test to 26,000 applicants for jobs as firefi

  • Gisbrecht v. Barnhart

    Publication Date: 2002-05-28
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2002-05-28
    Court: U.S. Sup. Ct.
    Judge: Justice Ginsburg
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 01-131

    535 U. S. ____ (2002)This case concerns the fees that may be awarded attorneys who successfully represent Social Security benefits claimants in court. Under 42 U. S. C. �406(b) (1994 ed. and Supp.