Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
16 results for 'Lowenstein Sandler/ industry:"Investments and Investment Advisory"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2024-12-24
Practice Area: Securities Litigation
Industry: Advertising | Investments and Investment Advisory
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Glasscock
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Steven L. Caponi, Matthew B. Goeller, K&L Gates LLP, Wilmington, DE; Neil T. Smith, Jennifer J. Nagle, K&L Gates LLP, Boston, MA for plaintiffs.
for defendant: Rudolf Koch, John M. O’Toole, Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., Wilmington, DE; A. Matthew Boxer, Rebecca J. Ryan, Lowenstein Sandler LLP, New York, NY for defendant.
Case Number: 2019-0202-SG
Extrinsic evidence did not support interpreting or reforming the contractual language of the parties' convertible notes where the record demonstrated that plaintiffs refused automatic conversion of their notes and instead agreed to a provision merely entitling them to repayment of the debt.
Publication Date: 2024-11-12
Practice Area: Mergers and Acquisitions
Industry: E-Commerce | Investments and Investment Advisory
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Laster
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Elizabeth A. Sloan, Ballard Spahr LLP, Wilmington, DE; Jason C. Spiro, Thomas M. Kenny, Marissa DeAnna, Spiro, Harrison & Nelson, Montclair, NJ for plaintiffs.
for defendant: Geoffrey G. Grivner, Kody M. Sparks, Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PC, Wilmington, DE; Geoffrey G. Grivner, Kody M. Sparks, Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PC, Wilmington, DE; Gavin J. Rooney, Lowenstein Sandler LLP, New York, NY for defendants.
Case Number: 2021-0346-JTL
Court rejected appraisal and breach of fiduciary duty claims where the record evidence demonstrated that plaintiff common stockholders' equity was worthless at the time of the merger as the company's investor's liquidation and redemption rights exceeded the company's reasonable value.
September 13, 2024 | New Jersey Law Journal
The party seeking to opt out had argued that maintaining its own lawsuit separate from the class action should have provided a "reasonable indication" of its plans.
4 minute read
March 21, 2024 | National Law Journal
Kirkland, Crowell, Quinn and Susman Godfrey, among others, have all had financial gains from contingency fee cases. "We've seen a noticeable increase in interest in building out plaintiff side practices," said Evan Meyerson, at Burford Capital.
6 minute read
October 24, 2023 | New York Law Journal
Michael Saarinen left Shearman weeks after partners overwhelmingly voted in favor of the merger with Allen & Overy.
4 minute read
September 7, 2023 | New York Law Journal
Jonathan Danziger spent the last 12 years at Glenview Capital Management, where he served as general counsel and chief compliance officer.
4 minute read
February 7, 2022 | New Jersey Law Journal
"The deal activity was robust throughout the year and it's actually continuing into 2022, even if the markets were a bit rocky in January," managing partner Gary Wingens said.
4 minute read
December 15, 2021 | Daily Business Review
Requiring defendants to admit wrongdoing in order to enter into a settlement is bound to prompt more defendants to try cases, according to Fort Lauderdale attorney David Chase.
6 minute read
Publication Date: 2021-06-16
Practice Area: Corporate Governance
Industry: Investments and Investment Advisory | Manufacturing
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Slights
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Samuel T. Hirzel, II, Elizabeth A. DeFelice, Heyman Enerio Gattuso & Hirzel LLP, Wilmington, DE; Matthew M. Oliver, Lowenstein Sandler LLP, Roseland, NJ for plaintiff.
for defendant: Oderah C. Nwaeze, Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP, Wilmington, DE for defendant.
Case Number: D69431
Claims alleging wrongful disposition of corporate resources or assets were essentially derivative in nature, meaning that former member of LLC lacked standing to assert such claims and could not do so after failing to make litigation demand or plead demand futility.
Publication Date: 2020-04-29
Practice Area: Bankruptcy
Industry: Investments and Investment Advisory
Court: U.S. Bankruptcy Court
Judge: Judge Sontchi
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Jeremy W. Ryan and R. Stephen McNeill, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE for the equity group. Christopher S. Simon and Kevin S. Mann, Cross & Simon, Wilmington, DE; Michael S. Etkin, Lowenstein Sandler LLP, Roseland, NJ for lead plaintiff.
for defendant: Laura Davis Jones, Alan J. Kornfeld, James E. O’Neill and Elissa A. Wagner, Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP, Wilmington, DE for SS Body Armor I, Inc. Frederick B. Rosner, Scott J. Leonhardt and Jason A. Gibson, The Rosner Law Group LLC, Wil-mington, DE; Robert M. Hirsh and Beth M. Brownstein, Arent Fox LLP, New York, NY for the recovery trust.
Case Number: D68964
The bankruptcy court had the power to aggregate remission payments realized by any of the parties and to redistribute them in accordance with the bankruptcy plan.
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
