Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
14 results for 'Wilson Sonsini Goodrich/ industry:"Investments and Investment Advisory"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2025-03-04
Practice Area: Corporate Governance
Industry: Investments and Investment Advisory | Technology Media and Telecom
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Fioravanti
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Stephen E. Jenkins, Marie M. Degnan, Ashby & Geddes, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Frank R. Schirripa, Daniel B. Rehns, Kurt Hunciker, Kathryn Hettler, Isaac G. Netzer, Hach Rose Schirripa & Cheverie LLP, New York, NY; Gregory Mark Nespole, Daniel Tepper, Correy A. Suk, Levi & Korsinsky, LLP, New York, NY; David A. Jenkins, Neal C. Belgam, Jason Z. Miller, Smith, Katzenstein & Jenkins LLP, Wilmington, DE; Steven J. Purcell, Robert H. Lefkowitz, Anisha Mirchandani, Purcell & Lefkowitz LLP, New York, NY for plaintiffs.
for defendant: Peter J. Walsh, Jr., Jacqueline A. Rogers, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE; Matthew Rawlinson, Latham & Watkins LLP, Menlo Park, CA; Colleen C. Smith, Latham & Watkins LLP, San Diego, CA; Kristin N. Murphy, Latham & Watkins LLP, Costa Mesa, CA; Bradley D. Sorrels, Andrew D. Cordo, Lauren G. DeBona, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, P.C., Wilmington, DE; David J. Berger, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, P.C., Palo Alto, CA; S. Toni Wormald, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, P.C., San Francisco, CA for defendants.
Case Number: 2022-0461-PAF
Court dismissed derivative complaint for lack of demand futility where plaintiff stockholders failed to allege sufficient facts to support finding that at least half of the demand board lacked independence from the controlling stockholder CEO or otherwise faced a substantial risk of liability for approving his equity compensation award without stockholder approval.
Publication Date: 2025-02-11
Practice Area: Securities Litigation
Industry: Investments and Investment Advisory | Pharmaceuticals
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Chancellor McCormick
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Jon E. Abramczyk, D. McKinley Measley, Elizabeth A. Mullin Stoffer, Jacob M. Perrone, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Monica K. Loseman, John D.W. Partridge, John Turquet Bravard, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Denver, CO; Mary Beth Maloney, Jonathan D. Fortney, Mark H. Mixon, Jr., Gibson, Dunn, Crutcher, New York, NY for plaintiff.
for defendant: Richard R. Rollo, Travis S. Hunter, John M. O’Toole, Kevin M. Kidwell, Edmond S. Kim, Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Brad D. Sorrels, Jessica A. Hartwell, Joshua A. Manning, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati P.C., Wilmington, DE for defendant.
Case Number: 2024-1102-KSJM
Company did not require preferred stockholder's approval for reverse stock split as the split did not affect the number of authorized shares or fall within the scope of other corporate actions requiring approval under the terms of the stockholder's class of shares.
December 18, 2024 | Legaltech News
A number of law firms and law firm partners decided to contribute to legal tech funding rounds in 2024.
1 minute read
Publication Date: 2024-11-19
Practice Area: Corporate Governance
Industry: Investments and Investment Advisory | Technology Media and Telecom
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Fioravanti
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Gregory V. Varallo, Andrew E. Blumberg, Daniel E. Meyer, Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann LLP, Wilmington, DE; Christopher J. Orrico, Shiva Mohan, Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann LLP, New York, NY; Jeremy S. Friedman, David F.E. Tejtel, Alexander M. Krischik, David A. Rosenfeld, Friedman Oster & Tejtel PLLC, Bedford Hills, NY; Joel Fleming, Lauren Godles Milgroom, Equity Litigation Group LLP, Boston, MA; D. Seamus Kaskela, Adrienne Bell, Kaskela Law LLC, Newtown Square, PA for plaintiff;
for defendant: Brad D. Sorrels, Andrew D. Cordo, Nora M. Crawford, Lauren G. DeBona, Jacqueline G. Conner, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati P.C., Wilmington, DE; Colleen C. Smith, Latham & Watkins LLP, San Diego, CA; Blair Connelly, Zachary L. Rowen, Thomas Giblin, Latham & Watkins LLP, New York, NY; Ryan A. Walsh, Latham & Watkins LLP, Costa Mesa, CA; David J. Berger, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati P.C., Palo Alto, CA for defendants.
Case Number: 2024-1029-PAF
Court declined to apply supermajority voting requirement under article of company's certificate of incorporation where it lacked language specifying its applicability to all possible forms of reincorporation.
July 23, 2024 | Legaltech News
The practice management software provider will leverage its latest funding round, which saw participation from Goldman Sachs, to accelerate its growth and product innovation, with plans for a new AI platform in the works.
11 minute read
June 26, 2024 | Legaltech News
Clearbrief, which has released a number of generative AI tools over the past year, noted that an investment fund associated with Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati participated in the round.
3 minute read
March 22, 2024 | Legaltech News
SingleFile, a startup that offers a platform to automate the compliance filing process, is financially backed by a number of firms, including Wilson Sonsini, Cooley and others.
3 minute read
January 24, 2024 | Legaltech News
Spellbook, which offers a generative AI-powered contract drafting and negotiation platform, is planning new developments focused on personalization, end-to-end workflows, accuracy and speed.
4 minute read
December 28, 2023 | Legaltech News
Generative AI-powered legal tech platforms secured some of the biggest funding rounds in a year when investments slowed significantly.
1 minute read
September 19, 2023 | Legaltech News
Darrow, which markets itself as a "justice intelligence platform," uses generative AI to analyze and scan public data to find viable class action and litigation opportunities.
2 minute read
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
