• January 11, 2005 | New York Law Journal

    Susan K. v. Marvin H.

    Justice Stack Read the Full-Text Opinion LAW GUARDIAN applied for counsel fees to de

    1 minute read

  • August 4, 2009 | The Legal Intelligencer

    Palestinian U.S. State Department Fellow Joins CLS Team

    There are many privileges that come with living in the United States — freedom to bear arms, freedom to express your ideas, freedom to practice the religion of your choice — but

    1 minute read

  • November 28, 2007 | New York Law Journal

    Mental Hygiene Legal Service v. Spitzer

    Judge LynchRead the Full-Text OpinionTHE SEX Offender Management and Treatment Act,

    1 minute read

  • September 26, 2005 | New York Law Journal

    Newsbriefs

    Sheppard Mullin Continues Expansion Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton has added a partner and a special counsel in New York. Susan Rosenthal and Alan Winick have jo

    1 minute read

  • August 5, 2009 | Daily Business Review

    Palestinian law intern helps poor with health benefits

    There are many privileges that come with living in the United States - freedom to bear arms, freedom to express your ideas, freedom to practice the religion of your choice - but for many Americans,

    1 minute read

  • September 27, 2005 | The Recorder

    Calif. Rule Shuts Out Foreign Lawyers

    When state legislators cracked down on deadbeat dads several years ago, they probably didn't realize it would stir up a minor international crisis over the practice of law -- one that Gov. Arn

    1 minute read

  • September 18, 2008 | New Jersey Law Journal

    In the Matter of the Proposed Xanadu Redevelopment Project

    Normal 0 false false false

    1 minute read

  • Riftin v. Stark

    Publication Date: 2005-09-30
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court, Kings County
    Judge: Arthur Schack
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number:

    KINGS COUNTY Supreme Coourt Justice Schack This case is illustrative of the famous l

  • Sabi v. Sterling

    Publication Date: 2010-04-09
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-04-08
    Court: C.A. 2nd
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: McDermott Will & Emery, Brandon J. Roker, Gregory R. Jones; Denise McGranahan; Brancart & Brancart, Christopher Brancart; and Catherine M. Bishop for Plaintiff and Appellant. Farella Braud & Martel, Grace K. Won, Andrew W. Ingersoll, Monica Swanson Hunt; and Linda D. Kilb for Disability Rights Advocates, Disability Rights California, Disability Right Education and Defense Fund, Disability Rights Legal Center, Law Foundation of Silicon Valley, and Legal Aid Society ? Employment Law Center as Amici Curiae on behalf of Plaintiff and Appellant. Barbara Jones for AARP, Legal Services of Northern California and National Senior Citizens Law Center as Amici Curiae on behalf of Plaintiff and Appellant. Howrey, Constance F. Ramos and Michael C. Chou for Bet Tzedek Legal Services, Housing Rights Center, Inner City Law Center, Coalition for Economic Survival, Tenants Together, Tenderloain Housing Clinic, the Impact Fund and Public Counsel as Amici Curiae on behalf of Plaintiff and Appellant.
    for defendant: Klinedinst, G. Dale Britton, Gregory A. Garbacz; and Douglas L. Walton for Defendants and Respondents. Pahl & McCay, Stephen D. Pahl, Karen K. McCay and Servando R. Sandoval for California Apartment Association as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Defendants and Respondents. Law Offices of Cummings Myer, Thomas B. Cummings and Audrey L. Myer for Apartment Association of Orange County as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Defendants and Respondents. Trevor A. Grimm and Craig Mordoh for California Apartment Law Information Foundation as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Defendants and Respondents.

    Case Number: No. B205279

    Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 4444ELISHEBA SABI, Plaintiff and Appellant,v.DONALD T. STERLING et al., Defendants and Respo

  • January 4, 2002 | National Law Journal

    Indiana Refines Its Pauper Law

    Although an Indiana law placed no limits on an indigent litigant's right to appointed counsel in a civil action, the Indiana Supreme Court held on Dec. 21 that that right is limited by t

    1 minute read