Filter This View

  • August 20, 2007 | Special To Law.Com

    Saving Good Judgment From the BlackBerry Culture

    In counseling their large law firm clients, management consultants frequently exhort firms to embrace responsiveness as the paramount virtue. When doing so they point to extensive research suggesti

    1 minute read

  • April 5, 2004 | National Law Journal

    Movers

    New partners McGlinchey Stafford (New Orleans): The firm has named six new members-M. Lucille Anderson (commercial litigation/Houston); Andrew J. Harrison Jr. (environmen

    1 minute read

  • Austin v. Scharp

    Publication Date: 1999-12-23
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 1999-12-23
    Court: Nebraska Supreme Court
    Judge: Hendry, C.J., Wright, Connolly, Gerrard, Stephan, McCormack, and Miller-Lerman, JJ.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Gordon R. Hauptman and Matthew A. Lathrop
    for defendant: John W. Iliff
    Case Number: No. S-98-616

    The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion. 1. Statutes: Appeal and Error. Statutory interpretation presents a question of law, in connection with whic

  • January 30, 2006 | New York Law Journal

    State Bar Urges Attorney Ad Guidelines

    Concerned that many attorneys are cavalierly ignoring the rules on lawyer advertising, the New York State Bar Association on Friday called for court-monitored oversight to provide guidance for

    1 minute read

  • December 11, 2006 | New York Law Journal

    Newsbriefs

    Indicted Milberg Partner Resigns From Firm Steven G. Schulman, a name partner at Milberg Weiss Bershad & Schulman, has resigned from the firm. Mr. Schulman and another name

    1 minute read

  • Taylor v. Sisto

    Publication Date: 2010-05-25
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-05-25
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Deanna F. Lamb, Central California Appellate Program, Sacramento, California, for the petitioner-appellant.
    for defendant: David Andrew Eldridge, Deputy Attorney General, Sacramento, California, for the respondent-appellee.
    Case Number: No. 09-15341

    Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 6381FRANK TAYLOR, Petitioner-Appellant, v.D. K. SISTO, Respondent-Appellee.p id=

  • June 23, 2003 |

    Developer Not Responsible For Solicitor Fees in Land Plan Review

    Interpreting two sections of the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code, the Commonwealth Court has ruled a municipality may not charge a developer for a solicitor's legal review fees i

    1 minute read

  • August 18, 2005 | New York Law Journal

    Lawmakers Seek Less-Expensive Patent System

    Lawmakers in Washington are considering changes to the patent code that would bring U.S. law closer to intellectual property standards in the rest of the industrialized world. T

    1 minute read

  • April 27, 2012 | The American Lawyer

    Ralph...Has Left the Building

    “I got an offer on this space this morning,” says Ralph Baxter as he strides through the glass-walled conference rooms that make up the top floor of the ten-story Orrick, Herrington

    1 minute read

  • In re Mitrano

    Publication Date: 2008-07-23
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2008-07-17
    Court: D.C. Ct. App.
    Judge: Farrell, Associate Judge, Retired:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For respondent: Peter Paul Mitrano, pro se.
    for defendant: For Office of Bar Counsel: Traci Tait, Office of Bar Counsel, Washington, D.C.
    Case Number: 07-BG-656

    On Report and Recommendation of the District of Columbia Board on Professional Responsibility (BDN 251-01)Argued June 12, 2008Before RUIZ and THOMPSON, Associate Judges, and FARRELL, Associate J