Filter This View

  • Austin v. Scharp

    Publication Date: 1999-12-23
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 1999-12-23
    Court: Nebraska Supreme Court
    Judge: Hendry, C.J., Wright, Connolly, Gerrard, Stephan, McCormack, and Miller-Lerman, JJ.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Gordon R. Hauptman and Matthew A. Lathrop
    for defendant: John W. Iliff
    Case Number: No. S-98-616

    The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion. 1. Statutes: Appeal and Error. Statutory interpretation presents a question of law, in connection with whic

  • January 30, 2006 | New York Law Journal

    State Bar Urges Attorney Ad Guidelines

    Concerned that many attorneys are cavalierly ignoring the rules on lawyer advertising, the New York State Bar Association on Friday called for court-monitored oversight to provide guidance for

    1 minute read

  • December 11, 2006 | New York Law Journal

    Newsbriefs

    Indicted Milberg Partner Resigns From Firm Steven G. Schulman, a name partner at Milberg Weiss Bershad & Schulman, has resigned from the firm. Mr. Schulman and another name

    1 minute read

  • Taylor v. Sisto

    Publication Date: 2010-05-25
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-05-25
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Deanna F. Lamb, Central California Appellate Program, Sacramento, California, for the petitioner-appellant.
    for defendant: David Andrew Eldridge, Deputy Attorney General, Sacramento, California, for the respondent-appellee.
    Case Number: No. 09-15341

    Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 6381FRANK TAYLOR, Petitioner-Appellant, v.D. K. SISTO, Respondent-Appellee.p id=

  • June 23, 2003 |

    Developer Not Responsible For Solicitor Fees in Land Plan Review

    Interpreting two sections of the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code, the Commonwealth Court has ruled a municipality may not charge a developer for a solicitor's legal review fees i

    1 minute read

  • August 18, 2005 | New York Law Journal

    Lawmakers Seek Less-Expensive Patent System

    Lawmakers in Washington are considering changes to the patent code that would bring U.S. law closer to intellectual property standards in the rest of the industrialized world. T

    1 minute read

  • April 27, 2012 | The American Lawyer

    Ralph...Has Left the Building

    “I got an offer on this space this morning,” says Ralph Baxter as he strides through the glass-walled conference rooms that make up the top floor of the ten-story Orrick, Herrington

    1 minute read

  • In re Mitrano

    Publication Date: 2008-07-23
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2008-07-17
    Court: D.C. Ct. App.
    Judge: Farrell, Associate Judge, Retired:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For respondent: Peter Paul Mitrano, pro se.
    for defendant: For Office of Bar Counsel: Traci Tait, Office of Bar Counsel, Washington, D.C.
    Case Number: 07-BG-656

    On Report and Recommendation of the District of Columbia Board on Professional Responsibility (BDN 251-01)Argued June 12, 2008Before RUIZ and THOMPSON, Associate Judges, and FARRELL, Associate J

  • Sonic-Calabasas A, Inc. v. Moreno

    Publication Date: 2013-10-17
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2013-10-17
    Court: Ca. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Fine, Boggs & Perkins, John P. Boggs and David J. Reese for Plaintiff and Appellant. Mayer Brown, Evan M. Tager, Archis A. Parasharami, Brian J. Wong, Donald M. Falk; National Chamber Litigation Center, Inc., and Robin S. Conrad for the Chamber of Commerce of the United States as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Plaintiff and Appellant. Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton, Richard J. Simmons, Karin Dougan Vogel and Matthew M. Sonne for Employers Group as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Plaintiff and Appellant. Horvitz & Levy, Lisa Perrochet, Felix Shafir and James A. Sonne for California New Car Dealers Association as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Plaintiff and Appellant.
    for defendant: Locker Folberg, Miles E. Locker and Rachel Folberg for Defendant and Respondent. Hina B. Shah; Cynthia Rice; Jose Tello; Miye Goishi; Silas Shawver; Fernando Flores and Charlotte Noss for Asian Law Caucus, Asian Pacific American Legal Center, Bet Tzedek Legal Services, California Rural Legal Assistance, Inc., Centro Legal de La Raza, Garment Worker Center, Hastings Civil Justice Clinic, Katharine and George Alexander Community Law Center, La Raza Centro Legal, Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights of the San Francisco Bay Area, Legal Aid Foundation of Los Angeles, Legal Aid Society-Employment Law Center, Maintenance Cooperation Trust Fund, National Employment Law Project, National Lawyers Guild Labor and Employment Committee, Neighborhood Legal Services of Los Angeles County, Wage Justice Center, Women's Employment Rights Clinic of Golden Gate University School of Law and Worksafe Law Center as Amici Curiae on behalf of Defendant and Respondent. McGuinn, Hillsman & Palefsky, Cliff Palefsky, Keith Ehrman; Smith & McGinty and Valerie T. McGinty for California Employment Lawyers Association and Consumers Attorneys of California as Amici Curiae on behalf of Defendant and Respondent. William A. Reich and Anne Hipshman for California Labor Commissioner Julie A. Su as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Defendant and Respondent.
    Case Number: No. S174475

    Cite as 13 C.D.O.S. 11453 SONIC-CALABASAS A, INC., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. FRANK M

  • July 23, 2009 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Supreme Court Rule Amendments

    SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY It is ORDERED that the attached amendments to the Rules Governing the Courts of the State of New Jersey are adopted to be effective September 1, 2009. Fo

    1 minute read