Filter This View

  • July 12, 2001 | Corporate Counsel

    Can Companies Ever Satisfy the ADA?

    The first president George Bush signed the Americans with Disabilities Act into law in July 1991. The employment discrimination provisions of that statute went into effect a year later. Since

    1 minute read

  • January 4, 2002 | Law.com

    Festo Set to Go Before High Court

    Charles R. Hoffmann admits that he feels a bit nervous about upcoming arguments in his case before the U.S. Supreme Court tomorrow, but what makes him even more skittish is the spectre of reversing

    1 minute read

  • Asymmetrx, Inc. v. Biocare Medical, LLC

    Publication Date: 2009-09-25
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2009-09-18
    Court: Fed. Cir.
    Judge: Lourie, Circuit Judge.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 2009-1094

    Before LOURIE, RADER, Circuit Judges, and CLARK, District Judge.*fn1AsymmetRx, Inc. ("AsymmetRx") appeals from the final judgment of the United States District Cou

  • October 18, 2004 | National Law Journal

    Decision summaries from the NLJ

    BANKRUPTCY Fee request by special counsel must cite � 328 A special counsel's request for compensation under � 3

    1 minute read

  • Information Resources, Inc. v. Dun and Bradstreet Corp.

    Publication Date: 2002-05-28
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2002-05-24
    Court: 2nd Cir.
    Judge: Sotomayor, Circuit Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 01-7640

    Argued: February 7, 2002The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Stanton, J.) granted partial summary judgment to defendants in this antitrust action on grounds that

  • Teamsters Local 445 Freight Division Pension Fund v. Bombardier Inc.

    Publication Date: 2008-10-20
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2008-10-14
    Court: 2nd Cir.
    Judge: Barringtond. Parker, Circuit Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 06-3794-cv

    Argued: March 13, 2008Before: B.D. PARKER,and LIVINGSTON, Circuit Judges, and HALL, District Judge.*fn1Teamsters Local 445 Freight Division Pension Fund ("Teams

  • Tamko Roofing Products, Inc. v. Ideal Roofing Co.

    Publication Date: 2002-03-27
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2002-03-07
    Court: 1st Cir.
    Judge: Selya, Circuit Judge, Campbell, Senior Circuit Judge, and Lynch, Circuit Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion. LYNCH, Circuit Judge. Tamko Roofing Products, Inc. won its trademark infringement case against Ideal Roofing Company,

  • October 20, 2009 | The Legal Intelligencer

    Panelists Predict Change That Will Shake Up the Legal Profession

    The slow-to-change nature of the legal profession is going to be put to the test in the coming months and years as external forces involving globalization, clients and regulation force the legal pr

    1 minute read

  • August 19, 2005 | Texas Lawyer

    Refurbishing -- or Copyright Infringement?

    Editor's note: The following is a hypothetical case study, with fictional managers and fictional businesses, that provide a way for executives to learn more about some of the situations the

    1 minute read

  • City of Emeryville v. Robinson

    Publication Date: 2010-09-15
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-09-15
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Robert P. Doty, Cox, Castle & Nicholson LLP, San Francisco, California, for the plaintiff-appellee. Henry S. Hewitt, Erickson, Beasley & Hewitt LLP, Oakland, California, for intervenor-appellee Howard F. Robinson, Jr. Carolyn Nelson Rowan, Miller Starr Regalia, Walnut Creek, California, for intervenors-appellees Adam and Jackson.
    for defendant: William D. Wick, Wactor & Wick LLP, Oakland, California, for the defendant-appellant.
    Case Number: No. 09-15018

    Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 12029 CITY OF EMERYVILLE; EMERYVILLE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. HOWARD