• Clapper v. Amnesty International USA

    Publication Date: 2013-02-26
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2013-02-26
    Court: U.S. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: No. 11-1025

    Cite as 13 C.D.O.S. 2081JAMES

  • United States v. Campa

    Publication Date: 2008-06-16
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2008-06-04
    Court: 11th Cir.
    Judge: Pryor, Circuit Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: Nos. 01-17176 & 03-11087

    [PUBLISH]Before BIRCH, PRYOR and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.Five agents of the Cuban Directorate of Intelligence who were members of La Red Avispa (in English, "The Wasp Network") challenge their

  • February 14, 2008 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Unpublished Opinions

    STATE COURT CASES ADMINISTRATIVE LAW - GUN PERMITS 01-2-9627 In re Application of Peterson, etc., App. Div. (per curiam) (8 pp.) On the prosecutor's appeal, the appellat

    1 minute read

  • Consolidated Cigar Corp. v. Reilly

    Publication Date: 2000-07-24
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2000-07-19
    Court: 1st Cir.
    Judge: Torruella, Chief Judge, Bownes, Senior Circuit Judge, and Lipez, Circuit Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: James V. Kearney, et al.
    for defendant: William W. Porter, et al.

    Case Number: No. 00-1274

    TORRUELLA, Chief Judge. Before the Court is a challenge to regulations promulgated by the AttorneyGeneral of Massachusetts which restrict the sale, promotion, and labeling of tobacco products in

  • October 7, 2011 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Unpublished Opinions

    STATE COURT CASES ATTORNEY/CLIENT 04-2-3789 Pernini v. Pernini, I/M/O Budd Larner, P.C., App. Div. (per curia

    1 minute read

  • Freedom Holdings Inc. v. Spitzer

    Publication Date: 2004-09-17
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number:

    U.S. District Court Southern District of New York Judge Hellerstein On January 6, 2004, the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, affirming and reversing my decisio

  • Emhart Industries, Inc. v. Century Indemnity Co.

    Publication Date: 2009-03-23
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2009-03-13
    Court: 1st Cir.
    Judge: Torruella, Circuit Judge.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: Nos. 07-2806 & 07-2821

    Before Torruella, Boudin, and Howard, Circuit Judges.This insurance coverage dispute arises from efforts by the Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") to remediate contamination at the Centredale

  • Amgen Inc. v. F. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd

    Publication Date: 2009-09-25
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2009-09-15
    Court: Fed. Cir.
    Judge: Schall, Circuit Judge.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: Nos. 2009-1020, -1096

    Before MAYER, CLEVENGER, and SCHALL, Circuit Judges.This is a patent case. Amgen Inc. ("Amgen") is the owner of U.S. Patent Nos. 5,441,868 ("the '868 patent"), 5,547,933 ("the '933 patent"), 5,618,

  • Centocor, Inc v. Patricia and Thomas Hamilton

    Publication Date: 2012-06-12
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-06-08
    Court: Tx. Sup. Ct.
    Judge: Paul W. Green Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: NO. 10-0223

    Argued December 8, 2011 JUSTICE GREEN delivered the opinion of the Court.Under the learned intermediary doctrine, the manufacturer of a pharmaceutical product satisfies its du

  • Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Dammann & Co., Inc.

    Publication Date: 2010-02-16
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-02-05
    Court: 3rd Cir.
    Judge: Fisher, Circuit Judge.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 09-1225

    PRECEDENTIALArgued December 2, 2009Before: FISHER, HARDIMAN and STAPLETON, Circuit Judges.OPINION OF THE COURTThe Travelers Indemnity Company sought a declaration in federal court that it