Filter This View

  • In re Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2010-01-06
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-01-05
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 14
    Judge: William J. Boyce Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: Nos. 14-09-00202-CV & 14-09-00107-CV

    Petition for Writ of Mandamus Conditionally Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Opinion filed January 5, 2010.ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUSOPINIONThis is an interlocutory appeal (Cause Numbe

  • Rentz v. Dynasty Apparel Industries, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2009-02-17
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2009-02-11
    Court: 6th Cir.
    Judge: Karen Nelson Moore, Circuit Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 07-4123

    RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206Argued: December 5, 2008Before: MERRITT and MOORE, Circuit Judges.*fn1OPINIONPaul

  • January 1, 2011 | Corporate Counsel

    Half-Baked Justice

    The initials BP are by now a household word. It is a name that in the public mind at least has become synonymous with longtime legal, environmental, and safety issues. The story starts two days aft

    1 minute read

  • In re Allied Chemical Corp.

    Publication Date: 2009-01-29
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2009-01-27
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 13
    Judge: Dori Contreras Garza, Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: Nos. 13-08-00206-CV & 13-08-00678-CV

    On Petition for Writ of MandamusOPINIONBefore Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Benavides.In September 1999, hundreds of plaintiffs sued more than thirty defendants, seeking damages

  • Malede v. United States

    Publication Date: 2001-02-23
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-02-22
    Court: D.C. Ct. App.
    Judge: Farrell, Associate Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 96-CF-737,, 99-C

    Appeals from the Superior Court of the District of Columbia (Hon. Frederick H. Weisberg, Trial Judge)Argued September 21, 2000Opinion for the court by Associate Judge Farrell.After a bench tr

  • Hester v. BIC Corporation

    Publication Date: 2000-11-08
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2000-09-14
    Court: 2nd Cir.
    Judge: NEWMAN, JACOBS, CARDAMONE, Circuit Judges
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Stephen J. Hyman, New York, N.Y. (Janet C. Neschis, Deanna R. Waldron, Leavy Rosenweig & Hyman, New York, N.Y., on the brief)
    for defendant: Michael Delikat, New York, N.Y. (John D. Giansello, Rene Kathawala, Orick Herrington & Sutcliff LLP on the brief)
    Case Number: No. 98-9465

    ANNIE HESTER, Plaintiff-Appelleev. BIC CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant. Hester v. BIC CorporationDocket No. 98-9465 United States Court of Appeal

  • Emery Worldwide Airlines, Inc. v. United States

    Publication Date: 2001-09-06
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-08-31
    Court: Fed. Cir.
    Judge: Gajarsa, Circuit Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 01-5075

    Appealed from: United States Court of Federal Claims Judge Christine O. C. MillerDECISIONOn January 10, 2001, the United States Postal Service ("USPS") awarded Federal Express Corp. ("FedEx") a

  • November 13, 2012 | New York Law Journal

    Patent Antitrust Equilibrium - A Quintessential Type 1 Error

    In their simplest forms, patent and antitrust laws seek to promote consumer welfare in very different and seemingly contradictory ways. If the patent is valid and was issued by the patent off

    1 minute read

  • August 20, 2002 | The Recorder

    Jury Verdicts

    These jury verdicts are reprinted courtesy of Jury Verdicts Weekly, an American Lawyer Media affiliate based in San Diego. To report a case or for more information on cases, c

    1 minute read

  • Rothman v. Gregor

    Publication Date: 2000-07-28
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2000-07-20
    Court: 2nd Cir.
    Judge: OAKES, NEWMAN, and STRAUB
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Ira M. Press, et al.
    for defendant: Michael S. Oberman, et al.
    Case Number: No. 00-7005

    The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion.This appeal concerns a securities fraud claim against a seller of computer software for misrepresenting its income by