• November 14, 2007 | New York Law Journal

    Examining Source Code Evidence

    For every new software product there are the inevitable bugs, patches and updates. In time, errors creep into -- or already exist in -- their operation and conflicts with other programs or versions

    1 minute read

  • Fannon v. Guidant Corp.

    Publication Date: 2009-10-26
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2009-10-21
    Court: 7th Cir.
    Judge: Wood, Circuit Judge.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 08-2429

    ARGUED JANUARY 16, 2009Before BAUER, FLAUM and WOOD, Circuit Judges.This case involves the claims of a plaintiff class that believes the defendant corporation defrauded them. The class asserts t

  • Lockheed Martin Corporation, on its own behalf and as Plan Sponsor, Plan Administrator and named fiduciary of the Lockheed Martin Corporation Retirement Income Plan III, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee v. Retail Holdings, N.V., Defendant-Counterclaimant-Cross-Claimant-Appellant, 09-2766-cv

    Publication Date: 2011-05-03
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
    Judge: Before: Winter, Leval, and B.D. Parker, C.JJ.*
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Daniel Himmelfarb, Mayer Brown LLP, Washington, D.C. (Robert Allen Meister, Pedowitz & Meister LLP, New York, NY; Robert P. Davis, Brian D. Netter, Mayer Brown LLP, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee.
    for defendant: Martin R. Gold (Michael S. Gugig, Matthew L. Lifflander, Benito Delfin, Jr., on the brief), Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal LLP, New York, NY, for Defendant-Counterclaimant-Cross-Claimant-Appellant.

    Case Number: 09-2766-cv

    Cite as: Lockheed Martin Corp. v. Retail Holdings, N.V, 09-2766-cv, NYLJ 1202492663037, at *1 (2d Cir., Decided April 26, 2011)Before: Winter, Leval, and

  • April 29, 2002 | New Jersey Law Journal

    All the World`s a Forum

    U.S. companies that operate abroad increasingly need to consider both the risks and opportunities presented by foreign courts that are expanding their jurisdictional reach, permitting multiplai

    1 minute read

  • July 3, 2002 | New York Law Journal

    Lawyers Take on Music Industry Rascals

    Two Young Entertainment Lawyers Score Big Wins for Clients THE IRISH rock musician Van Morrison offers a piece of hard-learned counsel for today's pop stars: "Music is spiritual.

    1 minute read

  • Cohen v. Viray, 08-3860-cv

    Publication Date: 2010-10-01
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District
    Judge: Before: Hall, Livingston, and Chin,* C.JJ.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: GARY D. SESSER (William F. Sondericker, Laura Anne Reeds, and Christopher J. Young, on the brief), Carter Ledyard & Milburn LLP, New York, New York, for Intervenor-Appellant D. David Cohen. THOMAS G. AMON, Law Offices of Thomas G. Amon, New York, New York, and Brian J. Robbins, and Gregory E. Del Gaizo, on the brief, Robbins Umeda LLP, San Diego, California, for Plaintiff-Appellee Alvin Viray, Derivatively on Behalf of DHB Industries, Inc.
    for defendant: ERIC RIEDER (David P. Kasakove and Chris M. LaRocco, of counsel, on the brief), Bryan Cave LLP, New York, New York, for Defendant-Appellee DHB Industries, Inc., now known as Point Blank Solutions, Inc.. MARK HOLLAND (Mary K. Dulka, on the brief), Goodwin Procter LLP, New York, New York, for Defendants-Appellees Barry Berkman, Cary Chasin, Gary Nadelman, and Jerome Krantz. JEROME GOTKIN, Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo, P.C., New York, New York, for Defendant-Appellee David H. Brooks. STEVEN G. KOBRE (Francisco J. Navarro, on the brief), Kobre & Kim LLP, New York, New York, for Defendant-Appellee Dawn M. Schlegel. RACHEL PENSKI, Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy LLP, New York, New York, for Defendants-Appellees David Brooks International, Inc., Elizabeth Brooks International, Inc., and Andrew Brooks International, Inc.

    Case Number: 08-3860-cv

    Cite as: Cohen v. Viray, 08-3860-cv, NYLJ 1202472745889, at *1 (2d Cir, Decided September 30, 2010)Before: Hall, Livingston, and Chin,* C.JJ.p class="decid

  • Dawson v. Entek International

    Publication Date: 2011-01-10
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-01-10
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge: Ann Aiken, District Judge, Presiding Before: William A. Fletcher and Raymond C. Fisher, Circuit Judges, and David C. Bury, District Judge.*
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Kevin T. Lafky and Haley Percell, Lafkey and Lafkey, Salem, Oregon, for the plaintiff-appellant.
    for defendant: Patricia K. Runkles-Pearson and Dennis Westlind, Stoel Rives LLP, Portland, Oregon, for the defendant-appellee.

    Case Number: No. 09-35844

    Cite as 11 C.D.O.S. 368SHANE DAWSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v.ENTEK INTERNATIONAL, Defendant-Appellee.p id="c

  • Carnegie Mellon University v. Hoffmann-LA Roche Inc.

    Publication Date: 2008-09-10
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2008-09-08
    Court: Fed. Cir.
    Judge: Lourie, Circuit Judge.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For plaintiffs-appellants: Frederick Colen, Reed Smith, Pittsburgh.
    for defendant: For defendants-appellees: Stephen Rabinowitz, Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson, New York.

    Case Number: Nos. 2007-1266 & 2007-1267

    Published opinionBefore LOURIE, BRYSON, and PROST, Circuit Judges.Carnegie Mellon University ("CMU") and Three Rivers Biologicals, Inc. (collectively "appellants") appeal from the decision of th

  • Baker v. A C and S, et al.

    Publication Date: 2000-06-28
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2000-06-26
    Court: Pa. Sup. Ct.
    Judge: CAPPY, SAYLOR, ZAPPALA and NEWMAN
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: No. J-12-2000

    The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion. OPINIONMR. JUSTICE CAPPY The question at issue concerns which method of set-off applies in this strict liabilit

  • Films by Jove, Inc. v. Berov

    Publication Date: 2004-11-18
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number:

    U.S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Judge Trager This is a motion pursuant to Rule 60(b), Fed. R. Civ. P., to vacate or modify this court's memoranda and