Filter This View

  • Giraldo v. State

    Publication Date: 2001-04-27
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Miller, M. Yvette
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: William G. Quinn III, Decatur, for Giraldo. Stephen T. Maples, Bernard Knight and Karlyn Skall, Decatur, for Brutus. J. Tom Morgan III, District Attorney, Kristin M. Childers and Gregory K. Schwarz, Assistant District Attorneys, Decatur, for appellee. Other party representation: William C. Puckett Jr. and William G. Quinn III, Decatur.
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A00A2037; A00A2038

    Police are authorized to retain non-Schedule I drugs confiscated in previous investigations and use them in reverse-sting operations so long as the origin of the drugs has been documented and forfei

  • Christopher v. Smithkline Beecham Corporation

    Publication Date: 2011-02-14
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-02-14
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge: Frederick J. Martone, District Judge, Presiding; Before: Mary M. Schroeder, Richard C. Tallman, and Milan D. Smith, Jr., Circuit Judges. Opinion by Judge Milan D. Smith, Jr.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Michael R. Pruitt, Esq.; Christine F. Crockett, Esq., Jackson White, P.C., Mesa, Arizona, for plaintiffs-appellants Michael Christopher and Frank Buchanan.
    for defendant: Neal D. Mollen, Esq.; Barbara L. Johnson, Esq., Paul Hastings Janofsky & Walker, L.L.P., Los Angeles, California, for defendant-appellee SmithKline Beecham Corporation.
    Case Number: No. 10-15257

    Cite as 11 C.D.O.S. 2004MICHAEL SHANE CHRISTOPHER; FRANK BUCHANAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants,p cla

  • Christopher v. SmithKline Beecham Corp.

    Publication Date: 2012-06-18
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-06-18
    Court: U.S. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: No. 11-204

    MICHAEL SHANE CHRISTOPHER, ET AL., Petitioners v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION DBA GLAXOSMITHKLINE No. 1

  • Christopher v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation

    Publication Date: 2012-06-18
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-06-18
    Court: U.S. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: No. 11-204

    Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 6646 MICHAEL SHANE CHRISTOPHER, ET AL., Petitioners v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION

  • IMS Health Inc. v. Ayotte

    Publication Date: 2008-11-24
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2008-11-18
    Court: 1st Cir.
    Judge: Selya, Circuit Judge.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 07-1945

    Before Lipez, Selya, and Siler, *fn1 Circuit Judges.The spiraling cost of brand-name prescription drugs is a matter of great concern to government at every level.

  • Freeman v. Hoffman-La Roche, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2000-11-03
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2000-10-27
    Court: Neb. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: Case Number S-98

    Aimee Freeman, appellant, v. Hoffman-La Roche, Inc., a corporation, appellee. Freeman v. Hoffman-La Roche, Inc., 260 Neb. 552 Filed October 27, 2000. No. S-98-1095.1. b

  • October 26, 2009 | New Jersey Law Journal

    In-House At Large Public Companies

    Company* td valign="top" style="backgro

    1 minute read

  • October 31, 2011 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Ineligible In-House Counsel, Multijurisdictional Practitioners and Pro Hac Vice Attorneys

    Pro hac vice attorneys, in-house counsel, and multijurisdictional practitioners attorneys are subject to the same requirements as licensed members of the New Jersey Bar under a number of Court Rule

    1 minute read

  • Advance Pharmaceutical Inc. v. United States

    Publication Date: 2005-01-13
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Unknown
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUIT Before: Calabresi, B.D. Parker, and Raggi, C.JJ. Appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of N

  • October 2, 2006 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Topical Index to Articles

    ADOPTION * Court Urges Lawmakers to Decide Adopted Siblings' Visitation Rights; by Michael Booth, July 24, p. 249. ADVICE FOR THE LAWLORN, CAREER TIPS FOR LAWYERS

    1 minute read