Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
3,600 results for 'K///////////// industry:"Pharmaceuticals"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
August 8, 2022 | The Legal Intelligencer
Munley Law has announced that partner Marion Munley was elected as the parliamentarian for the American Association for Justice (AAJ) at its annual convention in Seattle.
3 minute read
August 1, 2022 | The Legal Intelligencer
Former Stradley IP co-chair Joe Rossi and partner Paul Legaard pointed to their new firm's name recognition and critical mass of patent professionals to explain the move.
6 minute read
August 1, 2022 | National Law Journal
With a small but growing life sciences sector, the Netherlands has played an increasingly important role in European pharmaceutical regulation ever since the European Medicines Agency moved from London to Amsterdam as a result of Brexit.
5 minute read
Publication Date: 2022-07-29
Practice Area: Administrative Law
Industry: Federal Government | Pharmaceuticals
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Judge: Circuit Judge Robert Sack
Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Plaintiff-Appellant: Samantha Barrett Badlam, Ropes & Gray LLP, Washington, DC; Joan McPhee, Ropes & Gray LLP, New York, NY; Ilana H. Eisenstein, DLA Piper LLP, Philadelphia, PA, on the brief, Douglas Hallward-Driemeier, Ropes & Gray LLP, Washington, DC.
for defendant: For Defendants-Appellees: Benjamin H. Torrance, on the brief, Rebecca S. Tinio, For Damian Williams, United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, New York, NY.
Case Number: 21-2764-cv
Agency Properly Interpreted AKS When Rejecting Copay Aid Plan for 'Orphan' Heart Drug
July 26, 2022 | Law.com
Under the settlement, announced on Tuesday, Teva would provide $3.7 billion to states, local communities and Native American tribes, plus $1.2 billion worth of generic Narcan, a nasal spray used to treat opioid overdoses.
4 minute read
July 26, 2022 | Texas Lawyer
Teva negotiated the deal with the plaintiffs executive committee in the opioid multidistrict litigation, along with a "working group" of attorneys general of 12 states, including Texas, California, New York and Pennsylvania.
4 minute read
July 26, 2022 | The Recorder
Teva negotiated the deal with the plaintiffs executive committee in the opioid multidistrict litigation, along with a "working group" of attorneys general of 12 states, including California, New York, Pennsylvania and Texas.
4 minute read
July 26, 2022 | New Jersey Law Journal
The New Jersey Appellate Division upheld a jury's verdict of $1.8 million and a judge's award of $1.5 million in attorney fees for a former Novartis employee fired after blowing the whistle on the purchase of a report from one of the company's distributors that she believed constituted a kickback.
6 minute read
July 19, 2022 | Insurance Coverage Law Center
The company analyzed over 530,000 claims from 207 countries to identify the leading drivers of corporate losses.
8 minute read
Publication Date: 2022-07-19
Practice Area: Antitrust
Industry: Pharmaceuticals | Retail | State and Local Government
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Connolly
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Carmella P. Keener, Cooch and Taylor, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Bruce E. Gerstein, Joseph Opper, Kimberly M. Hennings, Daniel Litvin, Garwin Gerstein & Fisher LLP, New York, NY; Peter R. Kohn, Joseph T. Lukens, Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP, Philadelphia, PA; David F. Sorensen, Caitlin G. Coslett, Berger Montague PC, Philadelphia, PA; Stuart E. Des Roches, Amanda Hass, Chris Letter, Dan Chiorean, Thomas J. Maas, Odom & Des Roches, LLC, New Orleans, LA; Susan C. Segura, Erin R. Leger, David C. Raphael, Jr., Smith Segura Raphael & Leger, LLP, Alexandria, LA; Russell A. Chorush, Heim Payne & Cho Rush, LLP, Houston, TX; Michael J. Barry, Grant & Eisenhofer P.A., Wilmington, DE; Robert G. Eisler, Deborah A. Elman, Chad B. Holtzman, Grant & Eisenhofer P.A., New York, NY; Sharon K. Robertson, Donna M. Evans, Matthew W. Ruan, Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC, New York, NY; Michael J. Barry, Grant & Eisenhofer P.A., Wilmington, DE; Jayne A. Goldstein, Shepherd, Finkelman, Miller & Shah, LLP, Media, PA; J. Clayton Athey, Jason Wayne Rigby, Prickett, Jones & Elliott, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Barry L. Refsin, Alexander J. Egervary, Caitlin V. McHugh, Hangley Aronchick Segal Pudlin & Schiller, Philadelphia, PA; Monica L. Kiley, Eric L. Bloom, Hangley Aronchick Segal Pudlin & Schiller, Harrisburg, PA; J. Clayton Athey, Jason Wayne Rigby, Prickett, Jones & Elliott, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Scott E. Perwin, Lauren C. Ravkind, Anna T. Neil, Kenny Nachwalter, P.A., Miami, FL; Heidi M. Silton, Jessica N. Servais, Lockridge Grindal Nauen P.L.L.P., Minneapolis, MN; Peter Safirstein, Safirstein Metcalf LLP, New York, NY; Archana Tamoshunas, Taus, Cebulash & Landau, LLP, New York, NY; Lee Albert, Brian D. Brooks, Glancy, Prongay, & Myrray, New York, NY; Robert J. Kriner, Jr., Tiffany Joanne Cramer, Chimicles Schwartz Kriner & Donaldson-Smith LLP, Wilmington, DE; Dianne M. Nast, Joseph N. Roda, Michael D. Ford, NastLaw, Philadelphia, PA; Michael L. Roberts, Stephanie E. Smith, Roberts Law Firm US, PC, Little Rock, AR for plaintiffs.
for defendant: Daniel M. Silver, Alexandrea M. Joyce, McCarter & English, LLP, Wilmington, DE; John E. Schmidtlein, Benjamin M. Greenblum, Colette T. Connor, Thomas S. Fletcher, Akhil K. Gola, Williams & Connolly, Washington, DC; Arthur G. Connolly, III, Alan Richard Silverstein, Connolly Gallagher LLP, Wilmington, DE; Christopher J. Marino, James E. Gallagher, Davis Malm & D'Agostine, P.C., Boston, MA; Jack B. Blumenfeld, Michael J. Flynn, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Stephen J. McIntyre, O'Melveny & Myers LLP, Los Angeles, CA; Brett J. Williamson, O'Melveny & Myers LLP, Newport Beach, CA; Ben Bradshaw, O'Melveny & Myers LLP, Washington, DC; John W. Shaw, Karen E. Keller, Nathan Roger Hoeschen, Shaw Keller LLP, Wilmington, DE; Thomas J. Lang, Christina E. Fahmy, Peter M. Boyle, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP, Washington, DC for defendants.
Case Number: D69888
Antitrust claims arising from alleged reverse payment agreements were timely under the statute of limitations where each alleged supracompetitive sale constituted a discrete act that started the limitations period for that sale.
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
