Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
3,601 results for 'K//////////////////////////////////////// industry:"Pharmaceuticals"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
October 14, 2019 | Corporate Counsel
Doing more with less is something we have all had to reconcile at one time or another. For corporate legal departments, meeting service demands at some level through external service providers is simple math.
1 minute read
Publication Date: 2019-10-11
Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion List & Order on Application
Judge: Unsigned
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: DOCKET
Appellate Division, Second Department: October 9, 2019
Publication Date: 2019-10-10
Practice Area: Employment Litigation | Whistleblower Laws
Industry: Pharmaceuticals
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, U.S. - SDNY
Judge: District Judge John Koeltl
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 18-cv-9028
Contract Ambiguous if Bonus Guaranteed; SOX, NYLL §740 Retaliation Claims Not Stated
Publication Date: 2019-10-02
Practice Area: Deals and Transactions
Industry: Biotechnology
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor MCormick
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Jason A. Cincilla, Amaryah K. Bocchino, Ryan W. Browning and Tye C. Bell, Manning Gross + Massenburg LLP, Wilmington, DE; John M. Pierce, Michael M. Pomerantz, Elizabeth C. DeGori and Matthew J. Kokot, Pierce Bainbridge Beck Price & Hecht LLP, New York, NY for plaintiff.
for defendant: Lori W. Will, Daniyal M. Iqbal, Jeremy W. Gagas, Dylan J. Liddiard, Charles A. Talpas and Brian J. Levy, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, P.C., Wilmington, DE, Palo Alto, CA and New York, NY for defendants.
Case Number: D68723
The court granted a motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction over a foreign defendant, because the company was not bound by a forum selection clause contained in its subsidiary's contract with plaintiff and the facts did not support jurisdiction based on an agency theory.
September 30, 2019 | Corporate Counsel
Experts say the opioid crisis in America has damaged 2.4 million people, claimed 300,000 lives and has cost the country over $500 billion in economic harm.
1 minute read
Publication Date: 2019-09-30
Practice Area: Family Law
Industry:
Court: Supreme Court, Kings
Judge: Justice Jeffrey Sunshine
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Attorney for Plaintiff By: Maria Coffinas, Esq., Coffinas & Lusthaus1, Brooklyn, New York.
for defendant: Attorney for Defendant By: Raoul Felder, Esq. and Daniel Nottes, Esq., Felder, Felder and Nottes, P.C., New York, New York.
Case Number:
Legal Predicate for Husband to Seek Maintenance Ended When the Court Struck His Pleadings
Publication Date: 2019-09-25
Practice Area: Patent Litigation
Industry: Pharmaceuticals
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Kelly E. Farnan and Christine D. Haynes, Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Dominick A. Conde, Christopher P. Borello and Damien N. Dombrowski, Venable LLP, New York, NY for plaintiff.
for defendant: Jack B. Blumenfeld and Jeremy A. Tigan, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP,Wilmington, DE; Martin J. Black, Kevin M. Flannery, Robert Ashbrook, Sharon K. Gagliardi, Blake B. Greene and Katherine A. Helm, Dechert LLP, Philadelphia, PA and New York, NY for defendants.
Case Number: D68716
The court denied defendants' motion for judgment as a matter of law and alternative motion for a new trial, because the jury's verdict in this patent infringement matter was supported by the evidence.
Publication Date: 2019-09-25
Practice Area: Corporate Governance | Securities Litigation
Industry: Biotechnology | Pharmaceuticals
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, U.S. - SDNY
Judge: District Judge Vernon Broderick
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Counsel for Plaintiff: Thomas G. Amon, New York, New York.
for defendant: Counsel for Defendants: Jeremy Todd Adler (New York, New York), Michael G. Bongiorno (New York, New York), Timothy J. Perla (Boston, Massachusetts), Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & Dorr LLP.
Case Number: 18-cv-7999
Litigation Demand Prior to Shareholder's Derivative Action Would Have Been Futile
September 24, 2019 | Law.com
Here's the news you need to start your day.
1 minute read
Publication Date: 2019-09-18
Practice Area: Patent Litigation
Industry: Pharmaceuticals
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Stark
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Brian E. Farnan and Michael J. Farnan, Farnan LLP, Wilmington, DE; Raymond N. Nimrod, Steven C. Cherny, Matthew A. Traupman, Lauren N. Martin and Nancy Zhang, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, New York, NY, Boston, Ma and San Francisco, CA for plaintiffs.
for defendant: John W. Shaw, Karen K. Keller and Nathan R. Hoeschen, Shaw Keller LLP, Wilmington, DE; John C. Phillips, Jr. and David A. Bilson, Phillips, Goldman, McLaughlin & Hall, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Anuj K. Wadhwa, Rakoczy Molino Mazzochi Siwik, LLP, Chicago, IL; Scott J. Bornstein, Richard C. Pettus, Michael H. Imbacuan, Julie P. Bookbinder and Johnathan R. Wise, Green-berg Traurig, LLP, New York, NY and Philadelphia, PA for defendants.
Case Number: D68709
In this claim construction matter, the court determined that the disputed terms were not indefinite, because the specification and prosecution history provided sufficient guidance to a person of ordinary skill in the art.
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
