Filter This View

  • April 12, 2005 | Connecticut Law Tribune

    Large-Firm Associate Goes Solo to Serve Spanish-Speaking Clients

    A successful career as an associate on the partnership track at Hartford, Conn.-based Shipman & Goodwin wasn't enough for Jos� Rojas. At a time when the capital region's Spanish-sp

    1 minute read

  • October 13, 2005 | Legal Times

    Miers' Practice: Big-Name Clients, Low-Profile Cases

    Emma Schwartz [email protected] WASHINGTON-It was an unusual assignment for a commercial lawyer. But when then-gubernatorial candidate George W. Bush tapped Harriet Miers as gen

    1 minute read

  • December 1, 2003 | Texas Lawyer

    Newsmakers

    NEW POSITIONS. . . Chrysta Casta�eda has joined the Dallas office of Locke Liddell & Sapp as a partner practicing products liability, consumer class actions, public law and

    1 minute read

  • Curtis & Associates, P.C. v. Callaghan, 11831/10

    Publication Date: 2012-08-02
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court, Westchester County
    Judge: Justice Alan D. Scheinkman
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: The following papers numbered 1 to 87 were read on (1) the motion (Seq. No. 11) by respondent, Janet T. Callaghan ("Callaghan"), for an Order to vacate any default with regard to the October 28, 2011 Order of this Court, as modified by the February 8, 2012 Order of this Court, that so-ordered subpoenas duces tecum and ad testificandum on respondent, to grant renewal and/or to vacate the aforementioned February 8, 2012 Order of this Court to delete certain provisions therefrom, and to grant a protective order pursuant to CPLR 5240; (2) the motion (Seq. No. 12) by petitioner, Curtis & Associates, P.C. ("Curtis"), to stay the return date on the foregoing motion (Seq. No. 11); (3) the motion by petitioner Curtis (Seq. No. 14) to cite Callaghan for civil and/or criminal contempt for alleged failure to comply with prior discovery Orders of this Court; (4) the motion by respondent Callaghan (Seq. No. 15) to vacate such parts of the May 11, 2012 Order of this Court that directed respondent to appear personally before this Court on June 8, 2012, and provided that no further motions be made except upon prior written consent of this Court, and granting sanctions against petitioner in the amount of ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00); and (5) this Court's inquiry as to whether the conduct herein of respondent's counsel, Jeffrey Levitt, Esq., is sanctionable pursuant to Part 130-1.1 of the Uniform Rules of Trial Court:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 11831/10

    Cite as: Curtis & Associates, P.C. v. Callaghan, 11831/10, NYLJ 1202565654161, at *1 (Sup., WE, Decided July 24, 2012)Justice Alan D. Scheinkmanp

  • Metro Interior Distributors v. Hynes, CV-018994-11

    Publication Date: 2013-10-02
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: District Court, Nassau County, First District, Civil Part 3
    Judge: Judge Fred J. Hirsh
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Pro se: Tedd Blecher, Esq., Dean Neumann
    for defendant: Pro se: Todd Hynes Pro se: Lisa Hynes
    Case Number: CV-018994-11

    Cite as: Metro Interior Distributors v. Hynes, CV-018994-11, NYLJ 1202621396338, at *1 (Dist., NA, Decided September 20, 2013) CV-018994-11 Judge

  • April 29, 2013 | National Law Journal

    MOVERS

    NEW ARRIVALSHiscock & Barclay (Syracuse, N.Y.): John Cherundolo joins the firm's torts and products liability practice

    1 minute read

  • March 29, 2010 | Texas Lawyer

    Charts: New Partners for 2010

    table cols="8" rows="27" heads="0" feet="0" xmlns:debug="urn:debug" xmlns:map="urn:mapping" xmlns:k4="http://www.vjoon.com/K4Export/1.4.2" xmlns:fn="http://www.w3.org/2005/xpath-functions" xmlns:xs="

    1 minute read

  • August 27, 2012 | The American Lawyer

    Private Equity Deals Yield Roles for Six Am Law 100 Firms

    A trio of major private equity firms announced two major acquisitions on Monday, providing transactional work for six Am Law 100 firms.   a href="http://american

    1 minute read

  • September 21, 2001 | Connecticut Law Tribune

    Connecticut Attorneys Job Spat Brings on Unfair Trade Practices Claim

    The much-used Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act does have limits. It does not apply to employment disputes, and it doesn't apply to the practice of law generally -- only its "entrepreneur

    1 minute read

  • March 15, 2004 | National Law Journal

    Defense wins of 2003

    Facing a 'clean plaintiff' in a tobacco action CASE TYPE: Products liability CASE: Routh v. Philip Morris, No. 00-3030 CA 11 (Miami-Dade Co., Fla., Cir. Ct.) PLA

    1 minute read