Filter This View

  • April 25, 2006 | Legal Times

    Counselor for an Aging America

    Joan Wise is general counsel for AARP, the group formerly known as the American Association of Retired Persons.Q: Can you explain a bit about the founding of AARP?

    1 minute read

  • Arthur Properties, S.A., et ano., Plaintiffs v. ABA Gallery, Inc., et ano., Defendants, 11 Civ. 4409 (LAK)

    Publication Date: 2011-12-05
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District
    Judge: District Judge Lewis A. Kaplan
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Attorneys for Plaintiffs: Oleg Rivkin, Fox Horan & Camerini LLP.
    for defendant: Attorneys for Defendants: Steven M. Edwards, Eva L. Dietz, Hogan Lovells US LLP. Attorneys for Defendants: Malcolm S. Taub, Davidoff Malito & Hutcher LLP *1
    Case Number: 11 Civ. 4409 (LAK)

    Cite as: Arthur Properties v. ABA Gallery, Inc., 11 Civ. 4409 (LAK), NYLJ 1202534079916, at *1 (SDNY, Decided November 28, 2011)District Judge Lewis A. K

  • DBMS Investments, L.P. v. ExxonMobil Corp.

    Publication Date: 2009-06-15
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2009-06-11
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 13
    Judge: Dori Contreras Garza, Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NUMBER 13-08-00449-CV

    MEMORANDUM OPINIONBefore Justices Rodriguez, Garza, and VelaThis dispute pertains to allegations of underground water and sub-surface soil contamination by appellee, ExxonMobil Corporation f/k/a

  • Louisiana Wholesale Drug Co. Inc. v. Sanofi-Aventis, 07 Civ. 7343 (HB)

    Publication Date: 2009-09-04
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2009-08-28
    Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District
    Judge: Harold Baer
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 07 Civ. 7343 (HB)

    District Judge Harold Baer U.S. DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK For Plaintiff: Adam Matthew Moskowitz, Kozyak Tropin & Throckmorton, P.A. p

  • June 15, 2001 |

    The Empire Strikes Back

    This is a tale of two cities -- London and New York -- and the ways that their big firms deploy technology. Lawyers, it is often said, are motivated in equal measure by fear and greed. But whe

    1 minute read

  • March 31, 2008 | Legal Times

    The Greening of Law Firms

    Trimming The Paper TrailBy Jonathan S. Martel and Kristen Klick WhiteThe image of a lawyer buried under mounds of paper is no exaggeration. Each lawy

    1 minute read

  • Marek v. Old Navy (Apparel) Inc.

    Publication Date: 2004-12-22
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    U.S. DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Judge Sprizzo Plaintiff pro se Zdenek Marek ("plaintiff") brings the above-captioned actions against defendants Old N

  • Gemini Investors Inc v. Ameripark, Inc

    Publication Date: 2011-06-25
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-06-23
    Court: 1st Cir.
    Judge: Stahl, Circuit Judge.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 10-1312

    Before Lynch, Chief Judge, Souter,*fn1 Associate Justice, and Stahl, Circuit Judge.Gemini Investors Inc. ("Gemini") sued AmeriPark, Inc. ("AmeriPark")a HREF="#D*f

  • Bluetooth SIG, Inc. v. United States

    Publication Date: 2010-07-08
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-07-08
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: K. Lee Marshall, Bryan Cave LLP, Saint Louis, Missouri, argued the cause for plaintiff-appellant and filed the briefs. Mary Gassmann Reichert, Thomas C. Walsh, and B. Derek Rose, Bryan Cave LLP, Saint Louis, Missouri were on the briefs.
    for defendant: Bridget M. Rowan, Tax Division, Dep?t of Justice, Washington, District of Columbia, argued the cause for the defendant-appellee and filed the brief. Kenneth L. Greene, Tax Division, Dep?t of Justice, Washington, District of Columbia was on the brief.
    Case Number: No. 08-35312

    Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. BLUETOOTH SIG INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v.UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellee.

  • February 3, 2003 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Supreme Court Issues on Appeal

    A-1-02 State v. David Summers: Did the State's expert give an opinion on the ultimate issue of guilt and thereby impermissibly invade the province of the jury when he testified that a p

    1 minute read