• June 1, 2008 | The American Lawyer

    Big Deals/Canadian

    Evraz/TMK/Ipsco Tubulars Ipsco Tubulars continues to experience some twists and turns. In the biggest deal in Canada so far this year, Russian steelmaker Evraz Group SA agreed March 14 to p

    1 minute read

  • February 14, 2013 | The American Lawyer

    AMR's $11 Billion US Airways Merger a Boon to Big Firms

    Almost a dozen Am Law 100 firms have landed lead advisory roles on the a href="http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2013/02/13/american-and-us-air

    1 minute read

  • June 29, 2011 | National Law Journal

    Washington, D.C.'s 20 Most Influential In-House Attorneys

    The issues these top lawyers have handled range from the momentous, such as whether the United States should go to war, to the less serious (though still notable), such as how to draft multimillion

    1 minute read

  • September 15, 2011 | New York Law Journal

    Stalking the Big Banks With a '33 Act Gun

    On Sept. 2, the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA), as conservator for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, sued 17 financial institutions for a total of $196 billion, alleging material misstatements and

    1 minute read

  • May 15, 2008 | New York Law Journal

    New Deals

    Kirkland, King & Spalding, AmongTeams on Clearwire/Sprint Deal Clearwire Corp. and Sprint Nextel have unveiled plans for a $14.5 billion company to

    1 minute read

  • Gillis v. Dental Board of California

    Publication Date: 2012-05-23
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-04-30
    Court: C.A. 1st
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Kamala D. Harris, Attorney General, Alfredo Terrazas, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Linda K. Schneider, Supervising Deputy Attorney General and Kim M. Settles, Deputy Attorney General counsel for Plaintiff and Appellant.
    for defendant: Sellar Hazard Manning Ficenec & Lucia and William E. Manning counsel for Defendant and Respondent.

    Case Number: No. A131445

    Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 5567 ERROL M. GILLIS, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. DENTAL BOARD OF CALIFORNIA, Defenda

  • Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. Hudson River-Black River Regulating Dist., 10-4402-cv

    Publication Date: 2012-03-14
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
    Judge: Before: Hall, Lynch, and Lohier, C.JJ.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Plaintiff-Appellant: Mark D. Lansing, Hiscock & Barclay, LLP, Albany, NY.
    for defendant: For Defendant-Appellee Hudson River-Black River Regulating District: David M. Cherubin, Brown & Weinraub, PLLC, Albany, NY. For Defendant-Appellee New York State Department of Environmental Conservation: Owen Demuth, Assistant Solicitor General (Barbara D. Underwood, Solicitor General, Andrew D. Bing, Deputy Solicitor General, on the brief), for Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General of the State of New York, Albany, NY. For Intervenor-Appellee Sacandaga Protection Corporation: Benjamin K. Ahlstrom, Hodgson Russ LLP, Buffalo, NY.

    Case Number: 10-4402-cv

    Cite as: Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. Hudson River-Black River Regulating Dist., 10-4402-cv, NYLJ 1202545432333, at *1 (2d Cir., Decided March 7, 2012)Be

  • March 1, 2012 | Corporate Counsel

    Deals & Suits

    Gilead Pharmasset Gilead Sciences, Inc., agreed to pay $11 billion in cash for Pharmasset, Inc., on November 21, 2011, to acquire the target's treatments for hepatitis C, also

    1 minute read

  • April 7, 2008 | New York Law Journal

    Newsbriefs

    O'Melveny Private Equity Practice Joins Covington & Burling Covington & Burling has recruited to its New York office a seven-lawyer private equity practice from O'Melven

    1 minute read

  • Bailey v. Norfolk and Western Railway Co.

    Publication Date: 1999-12-15
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 1999-12-15
    Court: Supreme Court Of Appeals Of West Virginia
    Judge: JUSTICE McGRAW, JUSTICE SCOTT, JUDGE JOHN S. HRKO, JUSTICE DAVIS and JUSTICE MAYNARD
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: William Flanigan, Esquire; et al.
    for defendant: Jeffrey S. Berlin, Esquire; et al.

    Case Number: No. 26004

    The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. "In determining whether there is sufficient evidence to support a jury v