Filter This View

  • Security Life Ins. Co. of Am. v. Clark

    Publication Date: 2000-12-15
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Sears, Leah Ward
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: William D. Barwick, Teresa W. Roseborough, Robert J. Neis, Amelia T. Rudolph and Carla W. McMillian Sutherland, Asbill & Brennann LLP, Atlanta, for appellant.
    for defendant: Preyesh K. Maniklal, Hardy Gregory Jr., Davis, Gregory, Christy & Forehand, Cordele, William S. Stone and Kevin R. Dean William S. Stone PC, Blakely, for appellees. Amicus appellant: Harold G. Clarke Troutman Sanders, George E. Duncan Jr. Duncan & Mangiafico, Allen S. Willingham Love & Willingham, Lewis E. Hassett Morris, Manning & Martin, Atlanta, Thomas C. Alexander Jones, Cork & Miller, Macon, Billy N. Jones Jones, Osteen, Jones & Arnold, Hinesville, Peter R. Chaffetz, Thomas J. McCormack and Stanley B. Lutz Chadbourne & Parke LLP, New York, NY, Victoria E. Fimea, Washington, D.C.
    Case Number: S00G0006

    The Supreme Court reversed the Court of Appeals' decision in Security Life Ins. Co. v. Clark, 239 Ga. App. 690 1999, holding that it violated the law of the case doctrine on remand from the Supreme

  • Security Life Ins. Co. of Am. v. Clark

    Publication Date: 2000-09-22
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Sears, Leah Ward
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: William D. Barwick, Teresa W. Roseborough, Robert J. Neis, Amelia T. Rudolph and Carla W. McMillian Sutherland, Asbill & Brennann LLP, Atlanta, for appellant.
    for defendant: Preyesh K. Maniklal, Hardy Gregory Jr., Davis, Gregory, Christy & Forehand, Cordele, William S. Stone and Kevin R. Dean William S. Stone PC, Blakely, for appellees. Amicus appellant: Harold G. Clarke Troutman Sanders, George E. Duncan Jr. Duncan & Mangiafico, Allen S. Willingham Love & Willingham, Lewis E. Hassett Morris, Manning & Martin, Atlanta, Thomas C. Alexander Jones, Cork & Miller, Macon, Billy N. Jones Jones, Osteen, Jones & Arnold, Hinesville, Peter R. Chaffetz, Thomas J. McCormack and Stanley B. Lutz Chadbourne & Parke LLP, New York, NY, Victoria E. Fimea, Washington, DC.
    Case Number: S00G0006

    The Supreme Court reversed the Court of Appeals' decision in Security Life Ins. Co. v. Clark, 239 Ga. App. 690 1999, holding that it violated the law of the case doctrine on remand from the Supreme

  • December 1, 2009 | Legaltech News

    2009 Year In Review

    Editor's Note: Here is our annual summary of all new products announcements that appeared in Law Technology News from January, 2009 through November, 2009. A, B, C 3BVi

    1 minute read

  • May 18, 2001 | Law.com

    The Cost of Piracy

    According to the U.K.-based Business Software Alliance (BSA), on an annual basis, piracy costs the global software industry $12 billion. BSA believes that one in four software packages u

    1 minute read

  • June 27, 2006 | Special To Law.Com

    Road Rules for Open-Source Licensing

    Open-source software (OSS) is now a fact of life in the enterprise. Whether it crept in quietly over a period of years, as did the Linux operating system, or bulldozed an entire market sector virtu

    1 minute read

  • December 2, 2008 | New York Law Journal

    International Patent Prosecution After 'In re Bilski': Incorporating Limitations

    A recent decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit on the patentability of software and business methods will likely cause ripples that may reach across oceans to imp

    1 minute read

  • Planetary Motion, Inc. v. Techplosion, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2001-09-06
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-08-16
    Court: 11th Cir.
    Judge: TJOFLAT and WILSON, Circuit Judges, and RESTANI, Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion. RESTANI, Judge:Planetary Motion, Inc. ("Planetary Motion" or "Appellee") sued Techsplosion, Inc. and Michael Gay a

  • Information Services Group, Inc. v. Rawlinson

    Publication Date: 2009-11-06
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2009-11-05
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 14
    Judge: Jeffrey V. Brown Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 14-09-00242-CV

    Affirmed and Opinion filed November 5, 2009.OPINIONThis is an accelerated, interlocutory appeal from the trial court's order granting appellee Tony Rawlinson's special appearance. In two issues,

  • Christopher Watson and Intellectus, LLC, Plaintiffs v. Riptide Worldwide, Inc. (f/k/a Shea Development Corp.), Francis E. Wilde, Tommy E. Wheeler, E. Joseph Vitetta, Jr., Richard Connelly, and Philip E. Loeffel, Defendants, 11 Civ. 0874

    Publication Date: 2013-02-20
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District
    Judge: District Judge Paul Crotty
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 11 Civ. 0874

    Cite as: Watson v. Riptide Worldwide, Inc., 11 Civ. 0874, NYLJ 1202588424819, at *1 (SDNY, Decided February 4, 2013)District Judge Paul Crottyp class

  • September 5, 2006 | Special To Law.Com

    Who Owns Your Software Code?

    Brace yourself: You're about to be Ajax-ed, mashed up, Web-two-dot-oh'ed. There is, Gartner Research analysts warn, a "more open, flexible and participatory model for empowering third parties and c

    1 minute read