Filter This View

  • February 3, 2012 | The American Lawyer

    The Churn: Lateral Moves and Promotions in The Am Law 200

    Davis Polk & Wardwell has bolstered its white-collar criminal defense practice with the hire of GREG ANDRES in New York from the Department of Justice. Andres, who joins Davis Polk

    1 minute read

  • September 17, 2010 | The American Lawyer

    LETTER FROM LONDON: Europe's GCs Warn of More Pressure on Fees

    Some of Europe's most senior general counsel have warned law firms to expect a lasting shake-up in how they're retained and paid. Convening for a breakfast roundtable at London's College of Law yes

    1 minute read

  • December 21, 2012 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Unapproved Opinions

     STATE COURT CASES ADMINISTRATIVE LAW01-2-8486 In re Bid Solicitation #11-X-21175, Snow Removal and Sal

    1 minute read

  • January 1, 2010 | Corporate Counsel

    Deals & Suits

    Xerox ACS Darwin Deason finally struck a deal to sell Affiliated Computer Services, Inc., the company he founded in 1988. Xerox Corporation announced on

    1 minute read

  • Berg v. United States

    Publication Date: 2001-05-21
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-05-01
    Court: U.S. Cl. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: No. 95-748C

    The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion. OPINIONHORN, J.BACKGROUNDPlaintiffs' claims stem from their employment as civilian GS-856-12 electronictechn

  • RSR Corp. v. Siegmund

    Publication Date: 2010-03-30
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-03-26
    Court: Tx. App. Dist. 5
    Judge: Mary Murphy Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 05-09-00571-CV

    REVERSE and REMANDOPINIONBefore Justices FitzGerald, Murphy, and Thomas*fn1In this suit involving allegations of misuse of confidential information, appellan

  • USA v. Apple Inc., 12 Civ. 2826 (DLC)

    Publication Date: 2013-07-12
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District
    Judge: District Judge Denise Cote
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For plaintiff the United States: Mark W. Ryan, Lawrence E. Buterman, Daniel McCuaig, Stephen T. Fairchild, Nathan P. Sutton, Carrie Syme, Bill Jones, United States Department of Justice Antitrust Division, Washington, DC. For plaintiff States: For State of Texas, Liaison Counsel for Plaintiff States, Gabriel Gervey, Eric Lipman, David Ashton, Office of the Attorney General of Texas, Austin, TX. For State of Connecticut, Liaison Counsel for Plaintiff States W. Joseph Nielsen, Gary M. Becker, Office of the Attorney General of Connecticut, Hartford, CT.
    for defendant: For defendant Apple Inc.: Orin Snyder, Lisa H. Rubin, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, LLP, New York, NY. Daniel S. Floyd, Pro hac vice, Daniel G. Swanson, Pro hac vice, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, LLP, Los Angeles, CA. Cynthia Richman, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, LLP, Washington, DC. Howard E. Heiss, O'Melveny & Myers LLP, New York, NY.
    Case Number: 12 Civ. 2826 (DLC)

    Cite as: USA v. Apple Inc., 12 Civ. 2826 (DLC), NYLJ 1202610461227, at *1 (SDNY, Decided July 10, 2013) 12 Civ. 2826 (DLC) District Judge Denise

  • Realtime Data, LLC v. Morgan Stanley, 11 Civ. 6696

    Publication Date: 2012-10-01
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District
    Judge: District Judge Katherine B. Forrest
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 11 Civ. 6696

    Cite as: Realtime Data, LLC v. Morgan Stanley, 11 Civ. 6696, NYLJ 1202573007127, at *1 (SDNY, Decided September 24, 2012)District Judge Katherine B. F

  • May 25, 2012 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Unapproved Opinions

    STATE COURT CASES ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION 03-2-6328 Cooper Hospital University Medical Center v. Templeton, App. Div. (

    1 minute read

  • February 27, 2007 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Family Practice Committee2004-2007 Final Report

    TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction II. Proposed Rule Amendments for Adoption A. Proposed Amendment to R. 1:5-6, R. 1:6-3 and R. 5:5-4 - Re: Motions in Family Actions br

    1 minute read