• Federal Trade Commission v. Network Services Depot, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2010-08-16
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-08-16
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Willard K. Tom, John F. Daly, and Mark S. Hegedus (argued), Federal Trade Commission, Washington, D.C., Lisa D. Rosenthal, Kerry O?Brien, Federal Trade Commission, San Francisco, California, for the plaintiff-appellee.
    for defendant: Jeffrey S. Benice, Costa Mesa, California, for the defendants-appellants.

    Case Number: No. 09-15684

    Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 10561FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v.NETWORK SERVICES DEPOT, INC.; NETWORK M

  • September 12, 2002 | The Legal Intelligencer

    Cozen Lures Four More IP Lawyers From Woodcock

    Only a few months after acquiring a trio of trademark lawyers from Philadelphia's Woodcock Washburn, Philadelphia-based Cozen O'Connor has picked up four patent prosecution lawyers from the sa

    1 minute read

  • July 3, 2013 | The Recorder

    Report Details Data Breaches in California

    The personal information of 2.5 million Californians was compromised by 131 electronic data breaches in 2012, according to a a href="http://oag.ca.gov/news/press-releases/attorney-general-k

    1 minute read

  • May 7, 2010 | The American Lawyer

    Patent Litigation Weekly: In Acacia Paradox, Share Price Rises as Trial Record Lags

    The trick of making money from intellectual property, as any patent holding company will tell you, isn't winning a big trial verdict in the Eastern District of Texas. Trials are expensive and unpredic

    1 minute read

  • January 3, 2011 | The American Lawyer

    Late Breaking Deals in 2010 Paint Rosy M&A Picture for 2011

    Almost 20 deals in the $1 billion range were announced during the last weeks of 2010. Are they a sign of better times to come? Here is a quick guide to the legal adviso

    1 minute read

  • C.B. v. City of Sonora

    Publication Date: 2013-09-12
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2013-09-12
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge: Oliver W. Wanger, Senior District Judge, Presiding Before: M. Margaret McKeown and Paul J. Watford, Circuit Judges, and Thomas S. Zilly, Senior District Judge.*
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: John F. Martin and Christine Hopkins, Law Offices of John F. Martin, Walnut Creek, California, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    for defendant: Cornelius J. Callahan and Stephanie Y. Wu, Borton Petrini, LLP, Modesto, California, for Defendants-Appellants.

    Case Number: No. 11-17454

    Cite as 13 C.D.O.S. 10171 C.B., a minor, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CITY OF SONORA; MACE MCI

  • April 1, 2008 | Legaltech News

    Here, There, Everywhere

    First: Yes, it's true. Finally — after much resistance — I am now the owner of an 80 GB iPod Classic. Yes, yes, yes, I am drinking the Kool-Aid. Yes, it's great. Yes, I love shu

    1 minute read

  • Sonoma County Water Coalition v. Sonoma County Water Agency

    Publication Date: 2010-10-08
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-10-08
    Court: C.A. 1st
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Kronick, Moskovitz, Tiedemann & Girard, Eric N. Robinson and Andrew P. Tauriainen for the Association of California Water Agencies, League of California Cities, and California State Association of Counties as Amici Curiae on behalf of Defendants and Appellants. Law Offices of Stephan C. Volker, Stephan C. Volker, Joshua A.H. Harris and Bridget A. Roberts for Plaintiffs and Respondents.
    for defendant: Office of the Sonoma County Counsel, Steven M. Woodside, County Counsel, Steven S. Shupe and Cory Wurtzel O?Donnell, Deputies County Counsel; Bingham McCutchen, Stephen L. Kostka, Geoffrey L. Robinson and Marie A. Cooper; for Defendants and Appellants.

    Case Number: No. A124556

    Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 13041SONOMA COUNTY WATER COALITION et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. SONOMA COUNTY WAT

  • January 12, 2005 | D&o Advisor

    Life Without SOX -- It's Just Better

    David Hochberg, a current vice president and former director of Lillian Vernon Corporation in Rye, N.Y., doesn't give much thought to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 these days. Worries about r

    1 minute read

  • In re Ikon Office Solutions, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2002-01-14
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2002-01-11
    Court: 3rd Cir.
    Judge: Greenberg, Circuit Judge.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 01-1553

    Argued October 11, 2001OPINION OF THE COURTThis shareholders' class action case comes on before this court on plaintiffs-appellants' appeal from a February 6, 2001 order of the district court gr