• Gary Woods on behalf of himself and other consumers of the Maytag Gas Oven Appliance (Model MGR5875QDS) similarly situated, Plaintiffs v. Maytag Co., Defendants, 10-CV-0559 (ADS)(WDW)

    Publication Date: 2010-11-09
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Eastern District
    Judge: District Judge Arthur D. Spatt
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Attorneys for the Plaintiff: By: Andres F. Alonso, Esq., Of Counsel, Parker Waichman Alonso LLP, Great Neck, NY Attorneys for the Plaintiff: By: John T. Gorton, Esq., Of Counsel, Gorton & Gorton LLP, Garden City, NY
    for defendant: Attorneys for Defendants Maytag Corporation and Maytag Sales, Inc.: By: James K. Leader, Esq. & Thomas K. Richards, Esq., Of Counsel, Leader & Berkon LLP, New York, NY Attorneys for Defendants Maytag Corporation and Maytag Sales, Inc.: By: Michael T. Williams, Esq. & Theresa R. Wardon, Esq., Of Counsel, Wheeler Trigg O'Donnell LLP, Denver, CO Attorneys for Defendant Plesser's M.S.H., Inc.: By: Steven R. Kramer, Esq., Of Counsel, Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLC, White Plains, NY

    Case Number: 10-CV-0559 (ADS)(WDW)

    Cite as: Woods v. Maytag Co., 10-CV-0559 (ADS)(WDW), NYLJ 1202474487886, at *1 (EDNY, Decided November 02, 2010)District Judge Arthur D. Spattp class="deci

  • August 27, 2001 | National Law Journal

    After the Jurors Go Home

    SETTLEMENT COMES TOO LATE FOR PLAINTIFFSCASE TYPE: asbestos personal injuryCASE: In re asbestos litigation Arthur Trial Group, No. 95-C-12-037 (Sup.

    1 minute read

  • US v. Hassan Abu-Jihaad*, 09-1375-cr (L)

    Publication Date: 2010-12-22
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
    Judge: Before: Raggi, Hall, and Chin, C.J.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: William J. Nardini, Alexis Collins, Assistant United States Attorneys (Stephen Reynolds, Assistant United States Attorney; David Kris, Assistant Attorney General, National Security Division; John De Pue, Senior Litigation Counsel, Counterterrorism Section, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., on the brief), on behalf of Nora R. Dannehy, United States Attorney for the District of Connecticut, New Haven, Connecticut, for Appellee.
    for defendant: Dan E. Labelle, Halloran & Sage LLP, Westport, Connecticut, for Defendant-Appellant.

    Case Number: 09-1375-cr (L)

    Cite as: US v. Hassan Abu-Jihaad, 09-1375-cr (L), NYLJ 1202476523495, at *1 (2d Cir., Decided December 20, 2010)Before: Raggi, Hall, and Chin, C.J.p class=

  • September 24, 2013 | The Legal Intelligencer

    Lawyers on the Fast Track 2013 (Text)

    Click Here for the Interactive Layout | a href="http://www.eve

    1 minute read

  • United States v. Moussaoui

    Publication Date: 2010-01-11
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-01-04
    Court: 4th Cir.
    Judge: Traxler, Chief Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 06-4494

    PUBLISHEDArgued: September 25, 2009Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and GREGORY and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.Affirmed by published opinion. Chief Judge Traxler wrote the opinion, in which Judge Greg

  • US v. Hassan Abu-Jihaad*, 09-1375-cr (L)

    Publication Date: 2010-12-22
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
    Judge: Before: Raggi, Hall, and Chin, C.J.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: William J. Nardini, Alexis Collins, Assistant United States Attorneys (Stephen Reynolds, Assistant United States Attorney; David Kris, Assistant Attorney General, National Security Division; John De Pue, Senior Litigation Counsel, Counterterrorism Section, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., on the brief), on behalf of Nora R. Dannehy, United States Attorney for the District of Connecticut, New Haven, Connecticut, for Appellee.
    for defendant: Dan E. Labelle, Halloran & Sage LLP, Westport, Connecticut, for Defendant-Appellant.

    Case Number: 09-1375-cr (L)

    Cite as: US v. Hassan Abu-Jihaad, 09-1375-cr (L), NYLJ 1202476523495, at *1 (2d Cir., Decided December 20, 2010)Before: Raggi, Hall, and Chin, C.J.p class=

  • November 3, 2009 | New York Law Journal

    Matter of Robertson

    Administrative Law Judge Dennis M. Galliher Decided: Oct. 15, 2009 Petitioners, Julian H. Robertson and Josephine Robertson, filed a petition for redetermination of a deficiency

    1 minute read

  • Sykes v. Harris, 09 Civ. 8486

    Publication Date: 2012-09-07
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District
    Judge: Circuit Judge Denny Chin
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Plaintiffs By: Matthew D. Brinckerhoff, Esq., Elisha Jain, Esq., Emery Celli Brinkerhoff & Abady LLP, New York, NY. By: Claudia Wilner, Esq., Susan Shin, Esq., Josh Zinner, Esq., Neighborhood Economic Development Advocacy Project, New York, NY. -and- By: Carolyn E. Coffey, Esq., Andrew Goldberg, Esq., Anamaria Segura, Esq., MFY Legal Services, Inc., New York, NY.
    for defendant: For Mel Harris Defendants By: Brett A. Scher, Esq., Yale Pollack, Esq., Kaufman Dolowich Voluck & Gonzo LLP, Woodbury, NY. For Leucadia Defendants By: Lewis H. Goldfarb, Esq., Ryan P. Mulvaney, Esq., Philip W. Lamparello, Esq., McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLP, New York, NY. For Samserv Defendants By: Jordan Sklar, Esq., Babchick & Young, LLP, White Plains, NY.

    Case Number: 09 Civ. 8486

    Cite as: Sykes v. Harris, 09 Civ. 8486, NYLJ 1202570364332, at *1 (SDNY, Decided mber 4, 2012)Circuit Judge Denny ChinDecided:

  • Securities and Exchange Commission v. Tambone

    Publication Date: 2008-12-08
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2008-12-03
    Court: 1st Cir.
    Judge: Lipez, Circuit Judge.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 07-1384

    Before Selya and Lipez, Circuit Judges, and Delgado-Col*n,*fn1 District Judge.In this enforcement action brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC" o

  • March 24, 2011 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Unpublished Opinions

    STATE COURT CASES ADMINISTRATIVE LAW 01-2-1366 Office of Regulatory Affairs v. EIC Inspection Agenc

    1 minute read