Filter This View

  • In re Coudert Brothers LLP, 10 Civ. 9334 (VM)

    Publication Date: 2011-03-25
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District
    Judge: District Judge Victor Marrero
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 10 Civ. 9334 (VM)

    Cite as: In re Coudert Brothers LLP, 10 Civ. 9334, NYLJ 1202487802300, at *1 (SDNY, Decided March 21, 2011)District Judge Victor MarreroD

  • June 4, 2013 | The American Lawyer

    The Churn: Lateral Moves in The Am Law 200

    The Boston office of Duane Morris has welcomed back DANIEL WINSLOW, a Massachusetts politician who last worked at Duane Morris as a partner from 2005 to 2010.Wins

    1 minute read

  • June 13, 2002 | New York Law Journal

    Southern Law Firms Pushing Into New York Market

    Ask New York managing partners to name their chief competitors and they invariably begin with other New York firms. A few minutes into such conversations, the big London firms make their

    1 minute read

  • June 7, 2004 | Legal Times

    The View From Inside

    Summer associates aren't just for law firms anymore. This summer, seven local law students are working as interns in the corporate legal departments of D.C.-area companies, the inaugural

    1 minute read

  • August 19, 2013 | The American Lawyer

    Am Law 200 Cafeterias Clean Up Their Act

    Clarification, 8/20/13, 4:340 p.m. EDT: This story has been revised throughout to clarify that, except where explicitly noted, all references to 2012 health code violati

    1 minute read

  • October 29, 2007 | Legal Times

    Civil Actions

    The following selected cases were recently filed in .S. District Court for the District of Columbia; .S. District Court for the District of Maryland, Greenbelt division; and

    1 minute read

  • October 5, 2000 | New York Law Journal

    B2B for You and Me?

    Competitors that jointly form a business-to-business (B2B) exchange must consider numerous business and legal issues. These include not only antitrust matters, but questions of structure

    1 minute read

  • June 19, 2006 | National Law Journal

    The 100 most influential lawyers in America

    sp

    1 minute read

  • Azusa Land Partners v. Department of Industrial Relations

    Publication Date: 2010-12-21
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-12-21
    Court: C.A. 2nd
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis, Patrick A. Perry and Nancy�S. Fong for Plaintiff and Appellant. Paskerian Block Martindale & Brinton, Robin C. Martindale and Caleb J. Brinton IV for Rancho Mission Viejo as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Plaintiff and Appellant. Cox, Castle & Nicholson, John S. Miller, Jr. and Dwayne P. McKenzie for California Building Industry Association as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Plaintiff and Appellant.
    for defendant: Vanessa L. Holton, Anthony Mischel and Christopher Jagard for Defendant and Respondent.
    Case Number: No. B218275

    Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 15761AZUSA LAND PARTNERS, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, D

  • Lyon v. Gila River Indian Community

    Publication Date: 2010-11-24
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-11-24
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge: James A. Teilborg, District Judge, Presiding Before: Alex Kozinski, Chief Judge, J. Clifford Wallace and Richard R. Clifton, Circuit Judges.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Paul F. Eckstein (argued), Richard M. Lorenzen and Joel W. Nomkin, Perkins Coie Brown & Bain P.A., Phoenix, Arizona, for appellee-cross-appellant G. Grant Lyon.
    for defendant: Patricia A. Millett (argued), Mark J. MacDougall and Troy D. Cahill, of Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, Washington, D.C., and Jennifer Kay Giff, Pima Maricopa Tribe Law Office, Sacaton, Arizona, for appellant-cross-appellee Gila River Indian Community.
    Case Number: No. 08-15570 No. 08-15712

    Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 14676G. GRANT LYON, Plaintiff-counter-defendant-Appellee, v. GILA RIVER INDIAN COMMUNITY, D