• May 9, 2006 | New York Law Journal

    United States, appellee v. Jose D. Florez, defendant-appellant

    Decided May 3, 2006Before Kearse and Raggi, C.JJ., Restani, Ch.J., U.S.Court of Int'l Trade.1 Appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of

    1 minute read

  • March 27, 2013 | New York Law Journal

    Town Cannot Use Zoning Law to Ban Check Cashing Businesses

    A seven-year battle over a Long Island town's efforts to use its local zoning powers to ban check cashing establishments has come to an end. In a target="_blank" href="http://www.newyorkl

    1 minute read

  • Lagestee-Mulder, Incorporated v. Consolidated Insurance Company

    Publication Date: 2012-07-06
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-06-26
    Court: 7th Cir.
    Judge: Flaum, Circuit Judge.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 11-3730

    ARGUED APRIL 19, 2012Before EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge, and FLAUM and WOOD, Circuit Judges.This case presents a question under Illinois insurance law governing an insurer's duty to defend un

  • Hollis v. Hill

    Publication Date: 2000-11-21
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2000-11-17
    Court: 5th Cir.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 99-20725

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALSFOR THE FIFTH CIRCUITNo. 99-20725JAMES P. HOLLIS, Plaintiff-Appellee,versusDAN H. HILL,Defendant-Appella

  • Walnut Producers of California v. Diamond Foods, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2010-08-16
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-08-16
    Court: C.A. 3rd
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Bartko Zankel Tarrant & Miller, Charles G. Miller, Howard I. Miller; Tuttle & Van Konynenburg, Therese Tuttle, Frank Van Konynenburg; Lovitt & Hannan, J. Thomas Hannan, Ronald Lovitt, Henry Bornstein; MacDonald & Associates and Iain A. MacDonald for Plaintiffs and Appellants.
    for defendant: Winston & Strawn, Jeffrey J. Lederman, Jeffrey S. Bosley, and Leda M. Mouallem for Defendant and Respondent.

    Case Number: No. C060346

    Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 10579WALNUT PRODUCERS OF CALIFORNIA et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. DIAMOND FOODS, IN

  • United States v. Certain Real Property

    Publication Date: 2009-09-16
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2009-08-19
    Court: 11th Cir.
    Judge: Dubina, Chief Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 08-14334

    [PUBLISH]Before DUBINA, Chief Judge, EDMONDSON and HILL, Circuit Judges.The government appeals from a final order of the district court awarding attorney fees in a civil forfeiture action. This

  • May 30, 2002 | New Jersey Law Journal

    No Tort Remedy for Police Videotaped for Racial-Profiling Story

    Television producers did not defame three Jamesburg, N.J., policemen by secretly filming them in an apparent case of racial profiling and broadcasting the results, the Appellate Division

    1 minute read

  • Joseph Casias v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.; Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P.; and Troy

    Publication Date: 2012-09-24
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-09-19
    Court: 6th Cir.
    Judge: Clay, Circuit Judge.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 11-1227

    RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATIONPursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206File Name: 12a0343p.06Argued: April 18, 2012Before: SUHRHEINRICH, MOORE, and CLAY, Circuit Judges.CLAY, J.,

  • October 2, 2006 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Opinions Approved for Publication

    STATE COURT CASES CIVIL PROCEDURE - ADDITIONAL DISCOVERY AFTER REINSTATEMENT OF COMPLAINT 07-3-5195 Sprankle v. Adamar of N.J., Inc., etc., et al., Law Div. � Atlantic C

    1 minute read

  • Ganci v. New York City Transit Authority

    Publication Date: 2005-04-20
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number:

    U.S. DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Judge Holwell Plaintiffs bring this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §1983 against the New York City Transit Authori