Filter This View

  • February 23, 2010 | National Law Journal

    Toyota Executives Head to Capitol Hill to Testify on Public Safety Record

    Toyota executives head to Capitol Hill on Tuesday for the first of three hearings on the automaker's product safety record -- a trip to the political woodshed that could get the company into a deep

    1 minute read

  • November 4, 2011 | The American Lawyer

    Lawyers and Firms Navigate Social Media Mine Field

    "For Halloween this year, I am going as a sensationalist over-blown media story." The message, sent out via Twitter Monday afternoon by a target="new" href="http://www.kramerlevin

    1 minute read

  • December 15, 2003 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Suits & Deals

    Federal Jury Awards $20 Million for Disfiguring Infection After FaceliftHayes v. Cha: A federal jury in Camden awarded $20 million last Monday to a Philadelphia w

    1 minute read

  • People v. Solis

    Publication Date: 2013-06-14
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2013-05-15
    Court: C.A. 2nd
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Kamala D. Harris, Attorney General, Dane R. Gillette, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Lance E. Winters, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Michael R. Johnsen, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, William H. Shin, Deputy Attorney General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
    for defendant: Law Office of Joseph D. Allen, Joseph D. Allen and Alan Karow for Defendant and Appellant Juan Carlos Solis. Law Office of Alan Karow, Alan Karow; Law Office of Joseph D. Allen, Joseph D. Allen, for Defendant and Appellant Sinthia Alba Martinez. Esparza Law Group and Luis Esparza for Defendant and Appellant Rudy Aragon Lopez.
    Case Number: 2. d Crim. No. B238099

    Cite as 13 C.D.O.S. 6054THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. JUAN CARLOS SOLIS et al.

  • September 14, 2004 | The Recorder

    In Camera

    GOOD WORK -- BUT YOU'RE ON THE CHOPPING BLOCKMembers of the dream team that helped Attorney General Bill Lockyer win a ruling that could potentially return billions of dollars t

    1 minute read

  • November 7, 2011 | Daily Business Review

    The Tweet that roared: Lawyers and law firms navigate social media landmines

    "For Halloween this year, I am going as a sensationalist overblown media story." The message, sent out via Twitter on Monday afternoon by Jill Filipovic, sums up in 79 characters a week

    1 minute read

  • June 7, 2004 | Legal Times

    The View From Inside

    Summer associates aren't just for law firms anymore. This summer, seven local law students are working as interns in the corporate legal departments of D.C.-area companies, the inaugural

    1 minute read

  • U.S. Gas Electric Inc. v. Big Apple Energy LLC, 09-CV-1961

    Publication Date: 2010-04-16
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-04-10
    Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District
    Judge: Arthur Spatt
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 09-CV-1961

    District Judge Arthur D. Spatt U.S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Appearances: Attorneys for the Plaintiff: By: David J. Fischer, Esq., Jennifer Dou

  • People v. Barrett

    Publication Date: 2012-07-30
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-07-30
    Court: Ca. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Edmund G. Brown, Jr., and Kamala D. Harris, Attorneys General, Dane R. Gillette, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Gerald A. Engler, Assistant Attorney General, Laurence K. Sullivan, Dorian Jung, Seth K. Schalit and Lisa H. Ashley Ott, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
    for defendant: Jean Matulis, under appointment by the Supreme Court, for Defendant and Appellant. Deborah A. Dorfman and Sujatha Jagadeesh Branch for Disability Rights California, ARC of California, Capitol People First, Professor Robert Jacobs, Professor Michael Perlin and Olivia Raynor as Amici Curiae on behalf of Defendant and Appellant.
    Case Number: No. S180612

    Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 8538 THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. CHRISTINE BARRETT, Defendant and Appel

  • July 9, 2002 | New York Law Journal

    Outside Counsel

    In a landmark case that may profoundly affect the future of public education, the U.S. Supreme Court held in a 5-4 decision that a Cleveland school voucher program did not violate the Establishment

    1 minute read