• Mary Jo C. v. New York State and Local Retirement System, 11-2215

    Publication Date: 2013-02-01
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
    Judge: Before: Sack, Raggi, C.J., and Swain, D.J.*
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Plaintiff-Appellant: William M. Brooks, Mental Disability Law Clinic, Touro College, Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center, Central Islip, NY. For Defendant-Appellee: New York State and Local Retirement System., For: Eric T. Schneiderman Attorney General of the State of New York, New York, NY. Barbara D. Underwood, Solicitor General, Laura R. Johnson, Assistant Solicitor General, of Counsel, on the Brief.
    for defendant: For Defendant-Appellee Central Islip Public Library. William M. Savino, Harris J. Zakarin, on the Brief, Laura L. Shockley, Rivkin Radler LLP, Uniondale, NY. For: Amicus Curiae United States Department of Justice., For: Thomas E. Perez, Assistant Attorney General, Washington, DC., Jessica Dunsay Silver, on the Brief, Sasha Samberg-Champion, Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division, Appellate Section. For: Amici Curiae Disability Advocates, Inc., DRVT, National Disability Rights Network, and State of Connecticut office of Protection and Advocacy For Persons With Disabilities. Jo Anne Simon, Jo Anne Simon P.C., Brooklyn, NY. *1

    Case Number: 11-2215

    Cite as: Mary Jo C. v. New York State and Local Retirement System, 11-2215, NYLJ 1202586273526, at *1 (2d Cir., Decided January 29, 2013)Before: Sack, Rag

  • Fujitsu Limited v. Federal Express Corp.

    Publication Date: 2001-04-24
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-04-20
    Court: 2nd Cir.
    Judge: Spatt, District Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 00-7343

    Argued: November 8, 2000Appeal from a judgment in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Alvin K. Hellerstein, Judge), in favor of the Plaintiff, Fujitsu Limited, i

  • August 29, 2012 | The American Lawyer

    Big Suits

    U.S. v. GSK In the largest health care fraud s ettlement in history, U.K. drugmaker GlaxoSmithKline plc agreed to pay a total of $

    1 minute read

  • March 2, 2012 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Unapproved Opinions

    STATE COURT CASES   ADMINISTRATIVE LAW — APPEALS 01-2-5339 FTA Realty, L.P. v. New Jersey Department of Transp

    1 minute read

  • February 25, 2011 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Unpublished Opinions

    STATE COURT CASES ADMINISTRATIVE LAW — ELECTRIC ENERGY span style=

    1 minute read

  • Ruge v Utica First Insurance Company

    Publication Date: 2006-08-08
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, 2nd Dept
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 23612/02

    By Crane, J.P.; Mastro, Skelos and Dillon, JJ. Douglas R. Ruge, etc., ap, v. Utica First Insurance Company res ??? (Index No. 23612/02) In an action

  • August 1, 2013 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Unapproved Opinions

    July 25 to 31, 2013   STATE COURT CASES   BUSINESS ENTITIES — PERSONAL LIABILIT

    1 minute read

  • July 16, 2012 | Daily Business Review

    Globalization makes geography less relevant, more significant

    When a Miami federal judge issued an injunction against a new state law that prevents governments in Florida from hiring businesses with links to Cuba, the judge and lawyers involved displaye

    1 minute read

  • March 13, 2006 | The Associated Press

    United's bankruptcy tab: $335 million-plus

    By Dave Carpenter, Associated Press writer United Airlines' three-year bankruptcy restructuring, the largest and longest in the industry's history, will end up costing the carrier more

    1 minute read

  • Mastec North America, Inc. v. EL Paso Field Services, L.P.

    Publication Date: 2009-07-24
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2009-07-23
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 1
    Judge: Terry Jennings Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 01-07-00319-CV

    OPINIONThis is a breach of contract dispute brought by appellants, MasTec North America, Inc., and Mastec, Inc. (collectively, "MasTec"), against appellees, El Paso Field Services, L.P. and Gulfter