• The Board of Managers of The 231 Norman Avenue Condominium v. 231 Norman Avenue Property Development, LLC

    Publication Date: 2013-03-13
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court, Kings County, IAS Term, Part Comm-1
    Judge: Justice Carolyn E. Demarest
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Attorney For Plaintiff: Adam Leitman Bailey, Scott J. Pashman, Adam Leitman Bailey, PC, New York NY.
    for defendant: Attorney for Defendants: 231 Norman & Amir Yerushalmi, N. Ari Weisbrot, Phillips Nizer, LLP, New York NY. Turner & Friedman, Christopher Cobb, Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP, New York NY. MBK & Kriegh, Albert Wesley McKee, Gogick, Byrne & O'Neill, New York NY.

    Case Number: 4197/11

    Cite as: The Board of Managers of The 231 Norman Avenue Condominium v. 231 Norman Avenue Property Development, LLC, 4197/11, NYLJ 1202591994560, at *1 (Sup., KI, Decided July 2

  • June 7, 2007 | New York Law Journal

    New Deals

    Debevoise, Skadden, Shearman, Involved in Coca-Cola/Glaceau Deal The Coca-Cola Company has acquired Vitaminwater distributor Energy Brands Inc., commonly known as Glaceau, for $

    1 minute read

  • K.J. v. M.J., 19759/03

    Publication Date: 2007-03-09
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2007-02-09
    Court: Supreme Court, Westchester County
    Judge: William Giacomo
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 19759/03

    Justice William J. Giacomo WESTCHESTER COUNTY Supreme Court Justice Giacomo

  • October 5, 2007 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Unpublished Opinions

    STATE COURT CASES ATTORNEY/CLIENT � REAL ESTATE � HOME INSPECTIONS � ALTERNATIVE TORTFEASORS � ESTOPPEL 04-2-8609 Angerame v. Arnold, Esq., et al., App. Div. (pe

    1 minute read

  • June 28, 2004 | Texas Lawyer

    Moneymakers of 2003

    Gross revenue at the Texas 25, the 25 highest-grossing firms in Texas, was up 4.9 percent in 2003 compared to 2002, but the bigger story for 2003 is a substantial increase in profits per partn

    1 minute read

  • People v. Blackburn

    Publication Date: 2013-04-23
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2013-04-23
    Court: C.A. 6th
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Attorneys for Plaintiff and Respondent The People: Kamala D. Harris, Attorney General, Dane R. Gillette, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Gerald A. Engler, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Seth K. Schalit, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, John H. Deist, Deputy Attorney General
    for defendant: Attorney for Defendant and Appellant Bruce Lee Blackburn: Rudy Kraft, under appointment by the Court of Appeal for Appellant

    Case Number: No. H037207

    Cite as 13 C.D.O.S. 4027THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. BRUCE LEE BLACKBURN, Def

  • October 11, 2007 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Associates Class of 2007

    Once again, we offer a portfolio of the newest lawyers at New Jersey law firms, 406 recent arrivals who accepted our invitation to be featured in this, the Law Journal's eighth annual magazine

    1 minute read

  • April 14, 2011 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Unpublished Opinions

    STATE COURT CASES ADMINISTRATIVE LAW — DISABILITY BENEFITS 01-2-1627 Brown v. Board of Trustees, Public Employees Retirement System, App. Di

    1 minute read

  • People v. Tom

    Publication Date: 2012-03-20
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-03-19
    Court: C.A. 1st
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Counsel for Respondent: Edmund G. Brown Jr. Attorney General of California, Dane�R. Gillette Chief Assistant Attorney General, Gerald�A. Engler Senior Assistant Attorney General, Stan Helfman Supervising Deputy Attorney General, Mark�S. Howell Deputy Attorney General
    for defendant: Counsel for Appellant: Marc J. Zilversmit, First District Appellate Project, under appointment by the Court of Appeal

    Case Number: No. A124765 No. A130151

    Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 3259 THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. RICHARD TOM, Defendant and Appellan

  • September 28, 2009 | New Jersey Law Journal

    License Revocation Order Pursuant to Rule 1:28-2(c)

    SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY Pursuant to Rule 1:28-2, the Trustees of the New Jersey Lawyers' Fund for Client Protection (Fund) have reported to the Supreme Court the names of attorneys who f

    1 minute read