Filter This View

  • Davis v. Gap, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2001-04-04
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-04-03
    Court: 2nd Cir.
    Judge: Leval, Circuit Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 99-9081

    Argued: June 27, 2000Creator of nonfunctional jewelry worn in the manner of eyeglasses brought this action in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (Sweet, J.) alleging copy

  • Hornberger v. American Broadcasting Companies, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2002-05-23
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2002-05-21
    Court: N.J. Super. App. Div.
    Judge: King, P.J.A.D.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A-0783-00T2

    NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISIONArgued: February 27, 2002On June 28, 1996 at 9:30 p.m., plaintiffs, police officers in Jamesburg, stopped a Mercedes Benz in whi

  • Budget Blinds, Inc. v. White

    Publication Date: 2008-08-04
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2008-07-28
    Court: 3rd Cir.
    Judge: Smith, Circuit Judge.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: Case Nos. 06-2610 & 06-2733

    PRECEDENTIALArgued April 9, 2008Before: SMITH, HARDIMAN, and COWEN, Circuit Judges.OPINION OF THE COURTIn this appeal, we consider whether a federal district court properly relied on Feder

  • Long v. Office of Personnel Management, 5:05-CV-1522

    Publication Date: 2007-10-05
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2007-09-30
    Court: U.S. District Court for the Northern District
    Judge: Norman Mordue
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    District Judge Norman A. Mordue U.S. DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK APPEARANCES: OF COUNSEL: Adina H. Rosenbaum, Esq. Scott

  • United States v. Cavera

    Publication Date: 2009-01-26
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2008-12-04
    Court: 2nd Cir.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 05-4591-cr

    En Banc Rehearing March 27, 2008Before: JACOBS, Chief Judge, CARDAMONE,*fn1 CALABRESI, CABRANES, STRAUB,*fn2 POOLER, SACK, SOTOMA

  • Minnow v. Bureau of Reclamation

    Publication Date: 2010-04-23
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-04-21
    Court: 10th Cir.
    Judge: Holmes, Circuit Judge.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: Nos. 05-2399, 06-2020 & 06-2021

    PUBLISHBefore HENRY, Chief Judge, BALDOCK and HOLMES, Circuit Judges.This case involves one battle in a prolonged war over a finite and elemental resource-Rio Grande water. The needs of the plan

  • January 31, 2006 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Unpublished Opinions

    STATE COURT CASES ATTORNEY/CLIENT � AFFIDAVIT OF MERIT 04-2-6293 Ibrahim v. Browne, App. Div. (per curiam) (5 pp.) Plaintiff's legal-malpractice case was justifiably dis

    1 minute read

  • Franco v. Franco

    Publication Date: 2002-02-18
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2002-02-14
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 8
    Judge: Ann Crawford McCLURE, Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 08-00-00011-CV

    OPINIONThis is a relocation case. David Franco appeals the trial court's decision to lift the domicile restriction contained within the parties' final decree of divorce which required the residence

  • May 8, 2006 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Unpublished Opinions

    STATE COURT CASES AUTOMOBILES � NEGLIGENCE � DAMAGES 05-2-3732 Yeomans v. Gibson, et al., App. Div. (per curiam) (20 pp.) The court affirms (1) the judgment entered on t

    1 minute read

  • United States v. Green

    Publication Date: 2010-04-07
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-04-05
    Court: 4th Cir.
    Judge: Davis, Circuit Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: Nos. 08-4088 & 08-4090

    PUBLISHEDArgued: October 29, 2009Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and GREGORY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.Affirmed by published opinion. Judge Davis wrote the majority opinion, in which Chief Judge