Filter This View

  • Vengalattore v. Cornell University

    Publication Date: 2022-06-08
    Practice Area: Civil Rights | Employment Litigation
    Industry: Education
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
    Judge: Circuit Judge Amalya Kearse
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Plaintiff-Appellant: Margaret A. Little, Richard A. Samp, New Civil Liberties Alliance, Washington, DC, on the brief, Caleb Kruckenberg, Washington, DC.
    for defendant: For Defendant-Appellee Cornell University: Emily Reineberg, Morgan Lewis & Bockius, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Wendy E. Tarlow, Office of University Counsel, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, on the brief, Michael L. Banks, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. For Defendants-Appellees Miguel Cardona and U.S. Department of Education: Antoinette T. Bacon, Acting United States Attorney for the Northern District of New York, William Larkin, Assistant United States Attorney, Albany, New York, on the Brief, Karen Folster Lesperance, Assistant United States Attorney, Albany, New York.
    Case Number: 20-1514

    Claim Title IX Allows Right of Action for Cornell's Sex Bias Against Professor Has Merit

  • Lynch v. City of New York

    Publication Date: 2020-03-10
    Practice Area: Civil Rights
    Industry: State and Local Government
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
    Judge: Circuit Judge Amalya Kearse
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Plaintiff-Appellant: Jeffrey A. Rothman, New York, New York.
    for defendant: For Defendants-Appellees: Zachary W. Carter, Corporation Counsel of the City of New York, Richard Dearing, New York, New York, on the brief Melanie T. West, Assistant Corporation Counsel, New York, New York.
    Case Number: 18-1247-cv

    'Black Lives Matter' Marcher's Claims Partly Vacated; Probable Cause Analysis Was Flawed

  • December 24, 2019 | New York Law Journal

    Narrowing the Bounds of 'Windfall' Restitution Awards in Financial Fraud Cases

    In their Second Circuit Review column, Martin Flumenbaum and Brad S. Karp discuss 'U.S.v. Calderon,' where the Second Circuit limited the availability of "windfall" restitution awards and narrowed its interpretation of the "proximate cause" requirement for financial fraud victims under the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act of 1996.

    1 minute read