Filter This View

  • January 24, 2018 | Law.com

    Critical Mass: Talc Plaintiffs' Second Chance | When a $130M Settlement Isn't Enough | MDL Panel's Crowded Agenda

    Class action plaintiffs ask the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit to revive their case. Plus, the Aren't Fox lawyer who wants to tank a huge banking settlement.

    1 minute read

  • February 11, 2015 | Litigation Daily

    Investors Line Up for Looming Libor Appeal

    Less than a month after the U.S. Supreme Court reignited sprawling antitrust litigation accusing major banks of conspiring to

    1 minute read

  • February 11, 2015 | Litigation Daily

    Investors Line Up for Looming Libor Appeal

    Less than a month after the Supreme Court reignited sprawling antitrust litigation accusing major banks of conspiring to fix the London Interbank Offered Rate, the stage is quickly being set for the next big Libor battle at the Second Circuit.

    1 minute read

  • January 2, 2014 | Litigation Daily

    U.S. Judge Claims Jurisdiction Over State LIBOR Cases

    Southern District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald (See P

    1 minute read

  • December 30, 2013 | Litigation Daily

    LIBOR Judge Takes Control of State Court Investor Suits

    U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald in Manhattan ruled Monday that she has jurisdiction over two high-profile investor lawsuits filed against banks that set the LIBOR interest rate. On

    1 minute read

  • In re: Libor-Based Financial Instruments Antitrust Litigation. This Document Relates to: all Cases, 11 MD 2262(NRB)

    Publication Date: 2011-12-05
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District
    Judge: District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Attorneys for Plaintiffs: Linda P. Nussbaumt Esq., Grant & Eisenhofer PA, New York, NY. David E. Kovel, Esq., Kirby McInerney LLP, New York NY. Samuel H. Rudman Esq., Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP, Melville, NY. Christopher Lovell, Esq., Lovell Stewart Halebian Jacobson LLP, New York, NY. Arun Srinivas Subramania, Esq., Susman Godfrey LLP, New York NY. Ralph Johnson Bunche, III, Esq., Hausfeld LLP, Washington, DC. Brendan Patrick Glaskin, Esq., Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein LLP, San Francisco, CA. Max R. Schwartz, Esq., Scott & Scott LLP, New York, NY.
    for defendant: Attorneys for Defendants: Arthur J. Burke, Esq., Davis Polk & Wardwell, New York, NY. David Marx, Esq., McDermott, Will & Emery LLP, Chicago, IL. Edwin R Deyoung, Esq., Locke Lord Bissell & Liddell LLP, New York, NY. Dana Ashley Jupiter, Esq., Simpson Thacher & Bartlett, New York, NY. Lawrence H. Heftman, Esq., Schiff Hardin LLP, Chicago, IL. Andrew W. Stern, Esq., Sidley Austin LLP, New York, NY. Sean Miles Murphy, Esq., Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy LLP, New York, NY. Brian J. PoronskYr Esq., Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, Chicago, IL. *1
    Case Number: 11 MD 2262(NRB)

    Cite as: In re: Libor-Based Financial Instruments Antitrust Litigation., 11 MD 2262(NRB), NYLJ 1202534430677, at *1 (SDNY, Decided November 29, 2011)Distr