Filter This View

  • Fanatics Retail Group (Dreams), LLC v. Truax

    Publication Date: 2020-12-16
    Practice Area: Creditors' and Debtors' Rights
    Industry: Distribution and Wholesale | Manufacturing
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Noreika
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Jody C. Barillare, Brian A. Herman, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Wilmington, DE for plaintiff.
    for defendant: Michael D. DeBaecke, F. Troupe Mickler IV, Ashby & Geddes, P.A., Wilmington, DE for defendant.
    Case Number: D69223

    Court granted plaintiff judgment on the pleadings in its breach of guaranty claim, where defendant had executed an unconditional guaranty waiving defenses to the validity of the underlying debt or defenses available in bankruptcy.

  • Gavrieli Brands LLC v. Soto Massini (USA) Corp.

    Publication Date: 2020-04-08
    Practice Area: Patent Litigation
    Industry: Consumer Products
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Noreika
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: David W. Marston, Jr. and Amy M. Dudash, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Wilmington, DE; Michael J. Lyons and Ehsun Forghany, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Palo Alto, CA; Sharon R. Smith and Brett A. Lovejoy, Ph.D., Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, San Francisco, CA for plaintiff.
    for defendant: Stamatios Stamoulis, Stamoulis & Weinblatt LLC, Wilmington, DE; Stephen M. Lobbin and Austin J. Richardson, SML Avvocati P.C., San Diego, CA for defendants.
    Case Number: D68935

    Judgment as a matter of law or new trial on infringement claims denied where plaintiff presented expert testimony and real-world evidence showing that consumers were confused by defendant's allegedly infringing products.

  • Harris v. Lord & Taylor LLC

    Publication Date: 2019-05-08
    Practice Area: Class Actions | Cybersecurity
    Industry: Retail
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Noreika
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Ralph N. Sianni, Andersen Sleater Sianni, LLC, Wilmington, DE; Janine Pollack, The Sultzer Law Group P.C., New York, NY; Daniel Tepper, Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP, New York, NY; Ben Barnow and Erich P. Schork, Barnow and Assoc., P.C., Chicago, IL; Howard L. Longman and Melissa R. Emert, Stull, Stull & Brody, New York, NY; Charles E. Schaffer, Levin Sedran & Berman LLP, Philadelphia, PA; Jeffrey S. Goldenberg, Goldenberg Schneider, LPA, Cincinnati, OH; Gary Ma-son, Whitfield Bryson & Mason LLP, Washington, DC; Laurence D. King and David A. Straite, Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer, LLP, New York, NY; John A. Yanchunis and Ryan McGee, Morgan & Morgan, Tampa, FL; Jean Sutton Martin, The Law Office of Jeane Sutton Martin PLLC, Wilmington, NC; Lynda J. Grant, The Grant Law Firm PLLC, New York, NY for plaintiff and pro-posed class.
    for defendant: Jody C. Barillare, Gregory T. Parks, Ezra D. Church and Kristin M. Hadgis, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, LLP, Wilmington, DE and Philadelphia, PA for defendant.
    Case Number: D68553

    Both public and private interests favored the transfer of this class action proceeding to a federal district court in another state, where a similar action was already pending.

  • Prescient Med. Holdings, LLC v. Lab. Corp. of Am. Holdings

    Publication Date: 2019-02-27
    Practice Area: Antitrust
    Industry: Health Care
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Noreika
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Richard H. Cross, Jr., Cross & Simon, LLC, Wilmington, DE; Daniel W. Tarpey and Matthew M. Showel, Tarpey Wix LLC, Chicago, IL for plaintiff. Raymond J. DiCamillo, Chad Shandler and Katharine L. Mowery, Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Steven F. Barley, Marc A. Marinaccio and J. Robert Robertson, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Washington, DC for Laboratory Corp. of America defend-ants.
    for defendant: Jody C. Barillare, Eric Kraeutler, Steven A. Reed, R. Brendan Fee, Zachary M. Johns and Alexandra M. Lastowski, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Wilmington, DE and Philadelphia, PA for AmeriHealth de-fendants.
    Case Number: D68476

    Plaintiff lacked standing to assert an antitrust claim and it failed to adequately allege a relevant market.