• In Re: Initial Public OfferingSecurities Litigation,21 MC 92

    Publication Date: 2010-06-29
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: District Court, New York County
    Judge: District Judge Shira A. Scheindlin
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Plaintiffs' Executive Committee: Stanley D. Bernstein, Esq., Rebecca M. Katz, Esq., Christian Siebott, Esq., Bernstein Liebhard LLP, New York, New York David Kessler, Esq., Barroway Topaz Kessler Meltzer & Check LLP, Radnor, Pennsylvania Howard B. Sirota, Esq., Sirota & Sirota LLP, New York, New York Robert A. Wallner, Esq., Ariana J. Tadler, Esq., Peter G.A. Safirstein, Esq., Neil Fraser, Esq., Milberg LLP, New York, New York Jules Brody, Esq., Stull, Stull & Brody LLP, New York, New York Fred Taylor Isquith, Esq., Thomas H. Burt, Esq., Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP, New York, New York
    for defendant: Liaison Counsel for Underwriter Defendants: Gandolfo V. DiBlasi, Esq., Penny Shane, Esq., David M.J. Rein, Esq., Richard J.L. Lamuscio, Esq., Sullivan and Cromwell LLP, New York, New York Liaison Counsel for Issuer Defendants: Jack C. Auspitz, Esq., Joel C. Haims, Esq., Hilary M. Williams, Esq., Angela T. Rella, Esq., Reema S. Abdelhamid, Esq., Morrison and Foerster LLP, New York, New York For the Greene Objectors: Leland L. Greene, Esq., Garden City, New York For the Siegel Objectors: Edward F. Siegel, Esq., Cleveland, Ohio For the Pentz Objectors: John J. Pentz, Esq., Class Action Fairness Group, Maynard, Massachusetts For the Weinstein Objectors: Jeffrey L. Weinstein, Esq., The Weinstein Law Firm, Athens, Texas For the Bechtold Objectors: Theodore A. Bechtold, Esq., Brooklyn, New York James J. Hayes (Pro Se), Annandale, Virgnia

    Case Number: 21 MC 92

    District Judge Shira A. ScheindlinDecided: June 18, 2010For Plaintiffs' Executive Committee:S

  • October 20, 2009 | New York Law Journal

    2nd Circuit Abandons 2002 Ruling That Boosted Attachments

    The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals overruled a case Friday it said triggered a flood of maritime attachment orders and posed a threat to both the strength of the U.S. dollar and New York City's

    1 minute read

  • August 15, 2002 | New York Law Journal

    Firm Sanctioned in Dispute With Metropolitan Opera

    A Southern District of New York judge has sanctioned a Stamford, Conn., law firm and its client for their bad-faith pursuit of litigation against the Metropolitan Opera Association.U.S

    1 minute read

  • May 31, 2011 | New York Law Journal

    Seat of His Pants Guy Loses His Shirt: NY Lawyer's $515,000 Fee Tossed for Not Recording Hours

    A federal judge in Manhattan should not have awarded attorney Thomas P. Puccio more than $500,000 for handling an employment suit against New York City because Mr. Puccio did not k

    1 minute read

  • Int'l Assoc. of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, AFL-CIO v. Varig S.A., 07 Civ. 412

    Publication Date: 2007-06-29
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2007-06-21
    Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District
    Judge: Shira Scheindlin
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 07 Civ. 412

    District Judge Shira A. Scheindlin U.S. DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK For Plaintiff: Robert S. Clayman, Esq. Washington, D.C.

  • ST Shipping and Transport Inc. v. Golden Fleece Maritime Inc., 07 Civ. 11147

    Publication Date: 2008-09-18
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2008-09-09
    Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District
    Judge: Shira Scheindlin
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 07 Civ. 11147

    District Judge Shira A. Scheindlin U.S. DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Appearances For Plaintiff: John R. Foster, Esq. John R. K

  • Todd Johnson, Petitioner v. Harold Graham, Respondent, 09 Civ. 5838 (SAS) (KNF)

    Publication Date: 2010-10-15
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District
    Judge: District Judge Shira A. Scheindlin
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Petitioner (Pro Se): Todd Johnson, Arthur Kill Correctional Facility, Staten Island, NY
    for defendant: For Respondent: Paul M. Tarr, Assistant Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General, New York, NY

    Case Number: 09 Civ. 5838 (SAS) (KNF)

    Cite as: Johnson v. Graham, 09 Civ. 5838 (SAS) (KNF), NYLJ 1202473312834, at *1 (SDNY, Decided October 01, 2010)District Judge Shira A. Scheindlinp class="

  • Davis v. NYC, 10 Civ. 0699 (SAS)

    Publication Date: 2012-10-09
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District
    Judge: District Judge Shira A. Scheindlin
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Plaintiffs: Katharine E.G. Brooker, Esq., Daniel H. Wolf, Esq., Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, New York, NY. Debo P. Adegbile, Esq., Christina Swarns, Esq., Johanna B. Steinberg, Esq., Jin Hee Lee, Esq., Johnathan Smith, Esq., Ria Tabacco, Esq., NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc., New York, NY. Steven Banks, Esq., William D. Gibney, Esq., Steven Wasserman, Esq., Nancy Rosenbloom, Esq., Marlen S. Bodden, Esq., Legal Aid Society of New York, New York, NY.
    for defendant: For Defendant City of New York: Brenda E. Cooke, Judson Vickers, Wesley Bauman, Lisa Richardson, George Soterakis, Pernell Telfort, Assistant Corporation Counsel, New York City Law Department, New York, NY. For Defendant NYCHA: Steven Jay Rappaport, Esq., New York City Housing Authority, New York, NY.

    Case Number: 10 Civ. 0699 (SAS)

    Cite as: Davis v. NYC, 10 Civ. 0699 (SAS), NYLJ 1202573873710, at *1 (SDNY, Decided October 4, 2012)District Judge Shira A. Scheind

  • December 19, 2007 | New York Law Journal

    Newsbriefs

    Panel Dismisses Last Claim Against NYSE, Ex-CEO The Appellate Division, First Department, has dismissed a final claim filed against the New York Stock Exchange and ex-CEO John A

    1 minute read

  • October 8, 1999 | New York Law Journal

    NYS Home Care Not Discriminatory

    New York State does not discriminateby failing to include safety monitoring when it evaluates what home-careservices to provide people with mental disabilities under Medicaid, theSecond Circuit has

    1 minute read