• Hooven-Lewis v. Caldera

    Publication Date: 2001-05-03
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-05-01
    Court: 4th Cir.
    Judge: Lee, District Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 00-1439

    PUBLISHEDArgued: January 26, 2001Affirmed by published opinion. Judge Lee wrote the opinion, in which Judge Williams and Judge Traxler joined.OPINIONPlaintiff-Appellant Cheryl M. Hooven-Le

  • Vartelas v. Holder

    Publication Date: 2012-03-28
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-03-28
    Court: U.S. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: No. 10-1211

    PANAGIS VARTELAS, Petitioner v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., ATTORNEY GENERAL No. 10-12

  • Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Dammann & Co., Inc.

    Publication Date: 2010-02-16
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-02-05
    Court: 3rd Cir.
    Judge: Fisher, Circuit Judge.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 09-1225

    PRECEDENTIALArgued December 2, 2009Before: FISHER, HARDIMAN and STAPLETON, Circuit Judges.OPINION OF THE COURTThe Travelers Indemnity Company sought a declaration in federal court that it

  • Oneida Indian Nation of New York, Oneida Tribe of Indians of Wisconsin, Oneida of The Thames—Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross-Appellants, United States of America­—Intervenor-Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant, v. County of Oneida, County of Madison—Defendants-Cross-Appellees, State of New York—Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee, 07-2430-cv(L), 07-2548-cv(XAP), 07-2550-cv(XAP)

    Publication Date: 2010-08-10
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. Court Of Appeals, Second Circuit
    Judge: Before: McLaughlin, Livingston, Circuit Judges, and Gershon,* District Judge.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: KATHRYN E. KOVACS, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. (RONALD J. TENPAS, Acting Assistant Attorney General, CRAIG ALEXANDER, ELIZABETH ANN PETERSON, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., on the brief, and THOMAS BLASER, U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, D.C., of counsel), for Intervenor- Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant United States of America. MICHAEL R. SMITH (DAVID A. REISER, on the brief), Zuckerman Spaeder LLP, Washington, D.C., for Plaintiff- Appellee-Cross-Appellant Oneida Indian Nation of New York. ARLINDA F. LOCKLEAR, Washington, D.C., for Plaintiff- Appellee-Cross-Appellant Oneida Tribe of Indians of Wisconsin. CAREY R. RAMOS, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, New York, New York, for Plaintiff-Appellee- Cross-Appellant Oneida of the Thames. JOHN DOSSETT and VIRGINIA DAVIS, National Congress of American Indians, Washington, D.C., and KIM J. GOTTSCHALK, Native American Rights Fund, Boulder, Colorado, for Amicus Curiae National Congress of American Indians.
    for defendant: DENISE A. HARTMAN, Assistant Solicitor General (BARBARA D. UNDERWOOD, Solicitor General, ANDREW D. BING, Deputy Solicitor General, on the brief, and DWIGHT HEALY, White & Case, LLP, New York, New York, of counsel), for ANDREW M. CUOMO, Attorney General of the State of New York, Albany, New York, for Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee State of New York. DAVID M. SCHRAVER (DAVID H. TENNANT, on the brief), Nixon Peabody LLP, Rochester, New York, for Defendants-Cross-Appellees County of Oneida, County of Madison.

    Case Number: 07-2430-cv(L), 07-2548-cv(XAP), 07-2550-cv(XAP)

    Cite as: Oneida Indian Nation of New York, et al. v. County of Oneida, et al, 07-2430-cv, NYLJ 1202464406372, at *1 (2nd Cir., Decided June 21, 2010)Before: McL

  • United States v. Ofray-Campos

    Publication Date: 2008-07-15
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2008-07-07
    Court: 1st Cir.
    Judge: Keenan, District Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: Nos. 05-1461, 05-1462, 05-2315, 05-2627 & 06-1005

    Before Torruella, Circuit Judge, Lynch, Circuit Judge, and Keenan, *fn1 Senior District Judge.These five consolidated appeals arise from the convictions of the def

  • Vartelas v. Holder

    Publication Date: 2012-03-28
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-03-28
    Court: U.S. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: No. 10-1211

    Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 3505 PANAGIS VARTELAS, Petitioner v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., ATTORNEY GENERAL p id=

  • Beatie and Osborn LLP v. Patriot Scientific Corp.

    Publication Date: 2006-05-23
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District
    Judge: Peter Leisure
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number:

    U.S. DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Judge Leisure Plaintiff Beatie and Osborn, LLP ("B & O"), a New York law firm, brings this suit to collect unpaid

  • Rowan Companies, Inc. v. Wilmington Trust Co.

    Publication Date: 2009-04-02
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2009-03-31
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 14
    Judge: Eva M. Guzman Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 14-07-00465-CV

    Reversed and Remanded and Majority and Dissenting Opinions filed March 31, 2009.MAJORITY OPINIONIn this summary-judgment appeal, bareboat charterer Rowan Companies, Inc. challenges the trial cou

  • Vaughn v. Consumer Home Mortgage Co. Inc., 01-CV-7937

    Publication Date: 2007-01-30
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2007-01-22
    Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District
    Judge: I. Glasser
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 01-CV-7937

    Leo I. Glasser U.S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 01-CV-7937 (ILG) Richard J. Wagner Brooklyn Legal Services Corp. 'A' Hugh

  • RSR Corp. v. Siegmund

    Publication Date: 2010-03-30
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-03-26
    Court: Tx. App. Dist. 5
    Judge: Mary Murphy Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 05-09-00571-CV

    REVERSE and REMANDOPINIONBefore Justices FitzGerald, Murphy, and Thomas*fn1In this suit involving allegations of misuse of confidential information, appellan