Filter This View

  • March 31, 2014 | New York Law Journal

    Arbitrating Against Non-Signatories: The Current State of Play

    Arbitration is a creature of contract, made between consenting parties. As such, it is generally thought that those who have not signed an arbitration agreement cannot be compelled to arbitr

    1 minute read

  • March 26, 2014 |

    Gotham Ins. Co. v. Warren E & P, Inc.

    Click Here for FC&S Legal Expert Analysis Gotham Ins. Co.v.Warren E & P, Inc.2014 WL 1190049Only the Westlaw citation is currently available.NOTICE:…

    1 minute read

  • Estate of Gyuris, 332020/C

    Publication Date: 2014-03-24
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Surrogate's Court, Nassau County
    Judge: Surrogate Edward McCarty III
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Petitioner: Worby Groner Edelman & Napoli Bern, LLP.
    for defendant: guardian ad litem: Maeve J. Ryan, Esq. Attn: Teri Kosowsky, TDAB-Estate Tax Audit, Waiver of Citation Unit. For creditor: Benjamin Zeltner, Esq., Levine Staller Sklar Chan & Brown.
    Case Number: 332020/C

    Cite as: Estate of Gyuris, 332020/C, NYLJ 1202647741667, at *1 (Surr., NA, Decided March 17, 2014) 332020/C Surrogate Edward McCarty III a

  • Murray v. Schriro

    Publication Date: 2014-03-18
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2014-03-17
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge: David G. Campbell, District Judge, Presiding Before: Johnnie B. Rawlinson, Jay S. Bybee, and Sandra S. Ikuta, Circuit Judges.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: John E. Charland, The Charland Law Firm, Phoenix, Arizona, for Petitioner-Appellant.
    for defendant: Terry Goddard, Attorney General, Kent E. Cattani, Chief Counsel, Jeffrey A. Zick (argued), Assistant Attorney General, Capital Litigation Section, Phoenix, Arizona, for Respondent-Appellee.
    Case Number: No. 08-99013

    Cite as 14 C.D.O.S. 2913 ROGER W. MURRAY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. DORA SCHRIRO, War

  • Walker v. State

    Publication Date: 2014-03-13
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Hines, P. Harris
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Steven L. Sparger, Savannah, for appellant.
    for defendant: Margaret E. Heap, District Attorney, Isabel M. Pauley, Assistant District Attorney, Savannah, Samuel S. Olens, Attorney General, Patricia B. A. Burton, Deputy Attorney General, Paula K. Smith, Senior Assistant Attorney General, and Katherine L. Iannuzzi, Assistant Attorney General, Atlanta, for appellee.
    Case Number: S13A1910

    The defendant did not prove his ineffective assistance of counsel claims based on several alleged deficiencies, including counsel's failure to object when the State posed a hypothetical question to

  • THE FOLLOWING MOTION ORDERS WERE ENTERED AND FILED ON FEBRUARY 18, 2014

    Publication Date: 2014-02-20
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: First Judicial Department, Appellate Division
    Judge: Gonzalez, P.J., Tom, Mazzarelli, Friedman, Sweeny, JJ.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    M-112. MATTER OF A., MILTON v. A., TRACY H.M-281. MATTER OF W., DEAISHA; S., SHANIYA ANDO., Tristen - Commissioner of Social Services of the City of New YorkM-5707. MATTE

  • Peruta v. County of San Diego

    Publication Date: 2014-02-14
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2014-02-13
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge: Before: O'SCANNLAIN, THOMAS, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Paul D. Clement, Bancroft PLLC, Washington, D.C., argued the cause for the plaintiffs-appellants. Carl D. Michel, Michel & Associates, P.C., Long Beach, California, filed the briefs for the plaintiffs-appellants. With him on the opening brief were Glenn S. McRoberts, Sean A. Brady, and Bobbie K. Ross, Michel & Associates, P.C., Long Beach, California. With him on the reply brief were Glenn S. McRoberts, Sean A. Brady, and Bobbie K. Ross, Michel & Associates, P.C., Long Beach, California, and Paul Neuharth, Jr., Paul Neuharth, Jr. APC., San Diego, California.
    for defendant: James M. Chapin, Senior Deputy Attorney for County of San, San Diego, California, argued the cause and filed the brief for the defendants-appellees. With him on the brief was Thomas E. Montgomery, County Counsel for County of San Diego, San Diego, California.
    Case Number: No. 10-56971

    Cite as 14 C.D.O.S. 1524 EDWARD PERUTA; MICHELLE LAXSON; JAMES DODD; LESLIE BUNCHER, D

  • January 30, 2014 | The American Lawyer

    With Cleary on Board, Google Makes More Big Moves

    It may not have a traditional business plan, but as a href="http://investor.google.com/earnings/2013/Q4_goog

    1 minute read

  • January 24, 2014 |

    William Beaumont Hosp. v. Fed. Ins. Co.

    Click Here for FC&S Legal Expert Analysis William Beaumont Hosp.v.Fed. Ins. Co.2014 WL 185388Only the Westlaw citation is currently available.This…

    1 minute read

  • City of Clovis v. County of Fresno

    Publication Date: 2014-01-17
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2014-01-16
    Court: C.A. 5th
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Jarvis, Fay, Doporto & Gibson, Benjamin P. Fay and Rick W. Jarvis; Colantuono & Levin, Michael G. Colantuono and Jon R. DiCristina for League of California Cities as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Plaintiffs and Respondents. McCormick, Kabot, Jenner & Lew, Nancy A. Jenner for Plaintiffs and Respondents.
    for defendant: Freeman, D'Aiuto, Pierce, Gurev, Keeling & Wolf, Thomas H. Keeling; Kevin Briggs, County Counsel, Arthur G. Wille and Peter J. Wall, Deputy County Counsel, for Defendant and Appellant. Jennifer B. Henning for California State Association of Counties as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Defendant and Appellant.
    Case Number: No. F060148

    Cite as 14 C.D.O.S. 521 CITY OF CLOVIS et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. COUNTY O