• September 9, 2010 | The Legal Intelligencer

    Place Personal Preferences Over Rankings In Job Searches

    Unlike the college or law school selection process, most lawyers are not familiar with the reputations and names of the firms prior to practicing. Whereas in your law school selection process you m

    1 minute read

  • June 10, 2010 | The Legal Intelligencer

    R-E-S-P-E-C-T: Find Out What It Means to Justice!

    Late last year, the Philadelphia Inquirer ran an in-depth expose on the Criminal Justice System in the city of Philadelphia. The reporting detailed a system in crisis, troubled by rampant witness f

    1 minute read

  • Krottner v. Starbucks Corporation

    Publication Date: 2010-12-14
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-12-14
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge: Richard A. Jones, District Judge, Presiding Before: Alex Kozinski, Chief Judge, and Sidney R. Thomas and Milan D. Smith, Jr., Circuit Judges.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Lynn Lincoln Sarko, Mark A. Griffin, and Gretchen Freeman Cappio, Keller Rohrback L.L.P., Seattle, Washington; Mila F. Bartos, Karen J. Marcus, and Eugene J. Benick, Finkelstein Thompson LLP, Washington, DC; and Ben Barnow, Barnow and Associates, P.C., Chicago, Illinois, for the plaintiffs-appellants.
    for defendant: Gavin W. Skok and Karl J. Quackenbush, Riddell Williams, P.S., Seattle, Washington, for the defendant-appellee.

    Case Number: No. 09-35823 No. 09-35824

    Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 15434LAURA KROTTNER; ISHAYA SHAMASA, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, p class="casen

  • In re Marriage Cases

    Publication Date: 2008-05-15
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2008-05-15
    Court: Ca. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Sterling E. Norris for Judicial Watch, Inc., as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Defendants and Appellants State of California and Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger.
    for defendant: Thomas J. Kuna-Jacob as Amicus Curiae.

    Case Number: S147999

    Cite as 08 C.D.O.S. 5820In re MARRIAGE CASES. [Six?consolidated appeals.]No. S147999In the Supreme Court of CaliforniaC

  • November 21, 2005 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Pro Hac Vice Ineligibility Order Pursuant to Rule 1:28-2

    Supreme Court of New Jersey Pursuant to Rule 1:28-2, the Trustees of the New Jersey Lawyers' Fund for Client Protection have reported to the Supreme Court the names of those pro hac v

    1 minute read

  • September 20, 2007 | New Jersey Law Journal

    License Revocation Order Pursuant to Rule 1:28-2(c)

    Pursuant to Rule 1:28-2, the Trustees of the New Jersey Lawyers' Fund for Client Protection (Fund) have reported to the Supreme Court the names of attorneys who for the seventh or more consecu

    1 minute read

  • August 1, 2007 | The American Lawyer

    Starving for (Class) Action

    The era was marked by mysterious envelopes. When opened, the official-looking documents inside informed the reader that, because he owned three shares of, say, Microsoft Corporation stock some

    1 minute read

  • Surrogate's Court,

    Publication Date: 2012-01-18
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court:
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number:

    AdministrationORDER SIGNE ATE OF ROBERT ANDERSON (3750/A/09); Elizabeth Macoline (336/47); Immacula Beaubrun (3229/05); Mae Dixon (561/96).DECREE SIGNE

  • Union Carbide Corp. v. Muriel Offerman

    Publication Date: 2000-01-25
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2000-01-25
    Court: The Supreme Court of North Carolina
    Judge: Freeman, Martin, Lake, and Wainwright
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Michael F. Easley and Kay Linn Miller Hobart
    for defendant: Jasper L. Cummings, Jr. and Paul H. Frankel

    Case Number: No. 453A98-2

    The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion.Union Carbide Corporation ("Union Carbide") is chartered under the laws of the State of New York, having its

  • September 19, 2005 | National Law Journal

    Antitrust dilemma emerges in U.S. courts

    An unlikely marriage between the Department of Justice's amnesty program in price-fixing cases and the recent reform of federal class action law has had an unexpected but profound effect

    1 minute read