Filter This View

  • Board of Adjustment of the Township of North Bergen v. B.A.P.S. Northeast, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2001-07-03
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-07-02
    Court: 3rd Cir.
    Judge: Rosenn, Circuit Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 00-2135

    Submitted Under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a) February 27, 2001Filed: July 2, 2001OPINION OF THE COURTThis appeal has its origin in BAPS's*fn1 application to the

  • November 23, 2009 | The Legal Intelligencer

    Top Verdicts

    !-- p.x01-body-copy {} span.bold-styles-bold- {} -- ta

    1 minute read

  • Davis v. NYC, 10 Civ. 0699 (SAS)

    Publication Date: 2012-10-09
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District
    Judge: District Judge Shira A. Scheindlin
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Plaintiffs: Katharine E.G. Brooker, Esq., Daniel H. Wolf, Esq., Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, New York, NY. Debo P. Adegbile, Esq., Christina Swarns, Esq., Johanna B. Steinberg, Esq., Jin Hee Lee, Esq., Johnathan Smith, Esq., Ria Tabacco, Esq., NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc., New York, NY. Steven Banks, Esq., William D. Gibney, Esq., Steven Wasserman, Esq., Nancy Rosenbloom, Esq., Marlen S. Bodden, Esq., Legal Aid Society of New York, New York, NY.
    for defendant: For Defendant City of New York: Brenda E. Cooke, Judson Vickers, Wesley Bauman, Lisa Richardson, George Soterakis, Pernell Telfort, Assistant Corporation Counsel, New York City Law Department, New York, NY. For Defendant NYCHA: Steven Jay Rappaport, Esq., New York City Housing Authority, New York, NY.
    Case Number: 10 Civ. 0699 (SAS)

    Cite as: Davis v. NYC, 10 Civ. 0699 (SAS), NYLJ 1202573873710, at *1 (SDNY, Decided October 4, 2012)District Judge Shira A. Scheind

  • August 31, 2007 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Redevelopment Process Reoriented

    Two decisions of the Supreme Court, coming six months apart, first expanded and then narrowed a local government's use of its power of eminent domain. These decisions will have a profound effe

    1 minute read

  • January 2, 2006 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Reinstatement of Attorneys

    The New Jersey Lawyers' Fund For Client Protection declares that the following attorneys, having fully satisfied the requirements of R.1:28-2 and R.1:20-1, are eligible to practice law in New

    1 minute read

  • Montana Sulphur & Chemical Company v. United States Environmental Protection Agency

    Publication Date: 2012-01-19
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-01-19
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge: Before: Michael Daly Hawkins and M. Margaret McKeown, Circuit Judges, and John W. Sedwick, District Judge.*
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Robert K. Baldwin, Goetz, Gallik & Baldwin, PC, Bozeman, Montana, for the petitioner.
    for defendant: Martin F. McDermott, United States Department of Justice, Environment & Natural Resources Division, Washington, D.C., for the respondent. Leslie Sue Ritts, Ritts Law Group, PLLC, Alexandria, Virginia, for Amicus National Environmental Development Association?s Clean Air Project. Russell S. Frye, FryeLaw, PLLC, Washington, D.C., for Amicus American Petroleum Institute.
    Case Number: No. 02-71657 No. 08-72642

    Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 740 MONTANA SULPHUR & CHEMICAL COMPANY, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL

  • Gray v. Citigroup, Inc., 09-3804-cv

    Publication Date: 2011-10-21
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
    Judge: Before: Walker, Cabranes, and Straub, C.JJ.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Plaintiffs-Appellants: Marc I. Machiz, Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC, Philadelphia, PA (Robert I. Harwood, Samuel K. Rosen, Tanya Korkhov, Harwood Feffer LLP, New York, NY; Marian P. Rosner, Andrew E. Lencyk, James Kelly-Kowlowitz, Wolf Popper LLP, New York, NY, on the brief).
    for defendant: For Defendants-Appellees: Lewis Richard Clayton, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, New York, NY (Brad S. Karp, Susanna Michele Buergel, Douglas M. Pravda, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, New York, NY; Lawrence B. Pedowitz, Jonathan M. Moses, John F. Lynch, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, New York, NY, on the brief).
    Case Number: 09-3804-cv

    Cite as: Gray v. Citigroup, Inc., 09-3804-cv, NYLJ 1202519590610, at *1 (2d Cir., Decided October 19, 2011)Before: Walker, Cabranes, and Straub, C.JJ

  • April 11, 2013 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Unapproved Opinions

    STATE COURT CASES BANKING AND FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS 06-2-9515 Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Dominguez, App. Div. (per curiam) (14 pp

    1 minute read

  • In re Citigroup, Inc.Bondholders Litigation,08 Civ. 9522Decided: July 12

    Publication Date: 2010-07-14
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Unknown
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 08 Civ. 9522

    In re Citigroup, Inc.Bondholders Litigation Judge Sidney Stein Decided: July 12 Plaintiffs, all purchasers of bonds issued by or on behalf of Citigroup, bring this putative

  • United States v. Stitt

    Publication Date: 2001-05-30
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-05-25
    Court: 4th Cir.
    Judge: Williams, Circuit Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 99-2

    PUBLISHEDArgued: October 30, 2000Affirmed by published opinion. Judge Williams wrote the opinion, in which Judge Widener and Judge Motz joined.OPINIONRichard Thomas Stitt was convicted in