Filter This View

  • June 28, 2002 | Texas Lawyer

    Clear as Mud Underlying Patterns to 5th Circuit Employment Law Confusion

    Dazed and confused by the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals' numerous, seemingly contradictory and opaque opinions on employment law? Is your bafflement increased by the welter of firm newsletters,

    1 minute read

  • Daves v. State

    Publication Date: 2010-09-17
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-09-16
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 11
    Judge: Jim R. Wright Chief Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 11-09-00075-CR

    OPINIONA jury found Tracie Lee Daves guilty of the offense of possession of a controlled substance (cocaine) in an amount of one gram or more but less than four grams. That same jury assessed her p

  • July 2, 2010 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Unpublished Opinions

    June 24 to 30, 2010 STATE COURT CASES ADMINISTRATIVE LAW 01-2-8383 New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection v. Mazza , App. Div. (per curiam) (2 pp.) Appell

    1 minute read

  • December 23, 2005 | The Legal Intelligencer

    2005: A Competitive Time for Area Firms

    Editor's note: This is one of several articles taking a look at how Pennsylvania firms, courts and legal institutions fared during 2005. Last year's look back at events in the P

    1 minute read

  • School Board of Avoyelles Parish v. United States Department of Interior

    Publication Date: 2011-07-23
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-07-22
    Court: 5th Cir.
    Judge: Emilio M. Garza, Circuit Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 09-30660 , c/w, , Nos. 09-30897, , 09-31102.

    United States Court of AppealsFifth CircuitBefore GARZA, STEWART, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.These three closely related appeals arise out of two district court cases: Avoyelles Parish

  • Pacific Bell Telephone Company v. Southern California Edison Company

    Publication Date: 2012-08-31
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-08-30
    Court: C.A. 2nd
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: AT&T Services Legal Department and Gleam O. Davis for Plaintiff and Respondent.
    for defendant: Munger, Tolles & Olson, Henry Weissmann, Paul J. Watford, Leo Goldbard; Southern California Edison Company and Brian A. Cardoza for Defendant and Appellant.
    Case Number: No. B230470

    Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 10198 PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA

  • December 23, 2005 | The Legal Intelligencer

    2005: A Competitive Time for Area Firms

    Last year's look back at events in the Philadelphia legal community went something like this: Not too much happened in 2004.This year was a whole different story.Mergers happened left

    1 minute read

  • October 28, 2004 | New York Law Journal

    United States v. Robert Ike George

    Decided Oct. 8, 2004 Before Sotomayor, Katzmann, C.JJ. and Bertelsman, D.J. Appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Sidney

    1 minute read

  • October 28, 2004 | New York Law Journal

    United States v. Robert Ike George

    Decided Oct. 8, 2004 Before Sotomayor, Katzmann, C.JJ. and Bertelsman, D.J. Appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Sidney

    1 minute read

  • Queens County Second Department SUPREME COURT,

    Publication Date: 2012-12-19
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court:
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    Centralized Motion PartAra v. Weiss (10650/11)—Motion rawnArettines v. Riccardo's Catering Inc. (3387/11)—Motion