Filter This View

  • May 27, 2013 | The American Lawyer

    The Bankruptcy Files: Big Ideas Go Bust

    After surging in recent years, corporate bankruptcy filings in the United States have continued to fall, dropping 14.4 percent over the past year,

    1 minute read

  • People v. Copeland

    Publication Date: 2004-09-30
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, 1st Dept
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    By Nardelli, J.P., Andrias, Ellerin, Gonzalez, Catterson, JJ. 4172 The People of the State of New York, res, v. Richard Copeland, also known as Copeland Richards, de

  • BINKOWSKI, LUCILLE v HARTFORD ACCIDENT AND INDEMNITY COM

    Publication Date: 2009-03-27
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, 4th Dept
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 361

    SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 361 CA 08-01468 PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, C

  • September 1, 2010 | The American Lawyer

    Cases To Watch

    We asked top practitioners across the spectrum of litigation areas to tell us the cases they are watching most closely right now. Which cases are most likely to move the dial in developing areas of

    1 minute read

  • March 18, 2005 | New York Law Journal

    United States v. Silvio Spallone

    Decided March 4, 2005Before Sack, Raggi, and Hall, C.JJ. Appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Denis R. Hurley, Judge),

    1 minute read

  • August 30, 2006 | New York Law Journal

    People, respondent v. Christine A. Wilhelm, appellant

    Decided August 24, 2006Before Mercure, J.P., Crew III, Mugglin, Rose and Kane, JJ.Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Rensselaer County (McGrath, J.), rendered September

    1 minute read

  • In the Matter of Jose Hernandez v. City of White Plains, et al.

    Publication Date: 2003-01-13
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, 2nd Dept
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 2001-06539

    SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK APPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT 2591f A/hu AD2d Argued - December 13, 2002 FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P.

  • People v Mendoza

    Publication Date: 2008-04-22
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, 1st Dept
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 3429

    Lippman, P.J., Saxe, Gonzalez, Nardelli, JJ. 3429 Ind. 54109C/05 The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Silva Mendoza, Defendant-Appellant.

  • October 6, 2000 | The Legal Intelligencer

    3rd Circuit Rejects Hospitals' RICO and Antitrust Suit Against Tobacco Companies

    Chalk up another victory for Big Tobacco now that a federal appeals court has refused to revive an antitrust and civil RICO suit brought by 16 nonprofit hospitals in Pennsylvania to seek reimb

    1 minute read

  • Lazarin v. Superior Court (Total Western, Inc.)

    Publication Date: 2010-10-07
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-10-07
    Court: C.A. 2nd
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Altshuler Berzon and Scott A. Kronland for State Building and Construction Trades Council of California, AFL-CIO, as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Petitioner.
    for defendant: Keller Grover and Eric A. Grover; Law Offices of Scot D. Bernstein and Scot Bernstein; Law Offices of Ellyn Moscowitz and Ellyn Moscowitz for Petitioners Richard Lazarin, Gervis Quamina and Otis Skinner. No appearance for Respondent. Littler Mendelson, Robert L. Zaletel, Tarun Mehta and Lindbergh Porter, Jr., for Timec Company, Inc., as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Real Party in Interest. Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo, Steven D. Atkinson, Scott K. Dauscher, Christopher S. Andre and Jennifer D. Cantrell, for Real Party in Interest Total Western, Inc.
    Case Number: No. B222807

    Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 12971 RICHARD LAZARIN et al., Petitioners, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Res