• March 18, 2005 | New York Law Journal

    United States v. Silvio Spallone

    Decided March 4, 2005Before Sack, Raggi, and Hall, C.JJ. Appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Denis R. Hurley, Judge),

    1 minute read

  • August 30, 2006 | New York Law Journal

    People, respondent v. Christine A. Wilhelm, appellant

    Decided August 24, 2006Before Mercure, J.P., Crew III, Mugglin, Rose and Kane, JJ.Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Rensselaer County (McGrath, J.), rendered September

    1 minute read

  • In the Matter of Jose Hernandez v. City of White Plains, et al.

    Publication Date: 2003-01-13
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, 2nd Dept
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 2001-06539

    SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK APPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT 2591f A/hu AD2d Argued - December 13, 2002 FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P.

  • People v Mendoza

    Publication Date: 2008-04-22
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, 1st Dept
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 3429

    Lippman, P.J., Saxe, Gonzalez, Nardelli, JJ. 3429 Ind. 54109C/05 The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Silva Mendoza, Defendant-Appellant.

  • October 6, 2000 | The Legal Intelligencer

    3rd Circuit Rejects Hospitals' RICO and Antitrust Suit Against Tobacco Companies

    Chalk up another victory for Big Tobacco now that a federal appeals court has refused to revive an antitrust and civil RICO suit brought by 16 nonprofit hospitals in Pennsylvania to seek reimb

    1 minute read

  • Lazarin v. Superior Court (Total Western, Inc.)

    Publication Date: 2010-10-07
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-10-07
    Court: C.A. 2nd
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Altshuler Berzon and Scott A. Kronland for State Building and Construction Trades Council of California, AFL-CIO, as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Petitioner.
    for defendant: Keller Grover and Eric A. Grover; Law Offices of Scot D. Bernstein and Scot Bernstein; Law Offices of Ellyn Moscowitz and Ellyn Moscowitz for Petitioners Richard Lazarin, Gervis Quamina and Otis Skinner. No appearance for Respondent. Littler Mendelson, Robert L. Zaletel, Tarun Mehta and Lindbergh Porter, Jr., for Timec Company, Inc., as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Real Party in Interest. Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo, Steven D. Atkinson, Scott K. Dauscher, Christopher S. Andre and Jennifer D. Cantrell, for Real Party in Interest Total Western, Inc.

    Case Number: No. B222807

    Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 12971 RICHARD LAZARIN et al., Petitioners, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Res

  • People v Rivers

    Publication Date: 2009-06-02
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, 1st Dept
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 704

    Tom, J.P., Saxe, Sweeny, Acosta, Abdus-Salaam, JJ. 704 Ind. 3916/01 The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Bruce Rivers, Defendant-Appellant.

  • January 29, 2007 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Reinstatement of Attorneys

    The New Jersey Lawyers' Fund For Client Protection declares that the following New Jersey attorneys, having fully satisfied the requirements of R. 1:28-2 and R. 1:20-1, are eligible to practic

    1 minute read

  • Robert Bagley, Plaintiff v. J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., Defendant, 10 Civ. 1592

    Publication Date: 2012-07-26
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District
    Judge: District Judge Paul G. Gardephe
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 10 Civ. 1592

    Cite as: Bagley v. J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., 10 Civ. 1592, NYLJ 1202564200329, at *1 (SDNY, Decided July 12, 2012)District Judge Paul G. Gardephep

  • August 1, 2007 | National Law Journal

    The U.S. Supreme Court's 2006-07 Decisions

    During its 2006-2007 term, which concluded on June 28, the U.S. Supreme Court issued 67 signed opinions on cases briefed and argued before it. Included here are the summaries of those decision

    1 minute read