Filter This View

  • November 23, 2004 | New York Law Journal

    Motorola Credit Corporation v. Uzan

    Decided October 22, 2004Before Miner, Calabresi, and Cabranes, C.JJ. Appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Jed S. Rakof

    1 minute read

  • HOPKINS, JR., JAMES R. v GELIA, GINA F.

    Publication Date: 2010-02-11
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, 4th Dept
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 54

    SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 54 CAF 08-02258 PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, CA

  • April 15, 2003 | New York Law Journal

    United States, appellee v. William Henry, defendants Decided April 2, 2003 Before Feinberg, Pooler and Sotomayor, C.JJ., U.S. Court of AppealsSecond CircuitSecond Circuit

    1 minute read

  • Strouchler v. Shah, 12 Civ. 3216 (SAS)

    Publication Date: 2012-09-19
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U. S. District Court, Southern District
    Judge: District Judge Shira Scheindlin
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Plaintiffs: Toby Golick, Esq., Leslie Salzman, Esq., Cardozo Bet Tzedek Legal Services, New York, NY. Donna Dougherty, Esq., JASA / Legal Services for the Elderly in Queens, Rego Park, NY. Yisroel Schulman, Esq., Ben Taylor, Esq., Randal Jeffrey, Esq., N.Y. Legal Assistance Group, New York, NY.
    for defendant: For City Defendant: David Rosinus, Jr., Gloria Yi, Assistant Corporation Counsel, New York City Law Department, New York, NY. For State Defendant: Robert Kraft, Assistant Attorney General Office of the Attorney General for the State of New York, New York, NY.
    Case Number: 12 Civ. 3216 (SAS)

    Cite as: Strouchler v. Shah, 12 Civ. 3216 (SAS), NYLJ 1202571943209, at *1 (SDNY, Decided September 4,2012)District Judge Shira Scheindlinp class="de

  • Lisa M. Holland, Plaintiff v. David A. Gee, In His Official Capacity As Sheriff of

    Publication Date: 2012-04-20
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-04-17
    Court: 11th Cir.
    Judge: Martin, Circuit Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 11-11659 ,, 11-11884

    [PUBLISH]U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUITJOHN LEY CLERK(April 17, 2012)Before MARTIN, HILL and EBEL,*fn1 Circuit Judges.After hearing the e

  • Arizona v. United States

    Publication Date: 2012-06-25
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-06-25
    Court: U.S. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: No. 11-182

    ARIZONA, ET AL., Petitioners v. UNITED STATES No. 11-182 In the Supreme Court o

  • July 14, 2003 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Joye v. Hunterdon Central Regional High School Board of Education et al,

    A-27 September Term 2002; Supreme Court; opinion by Verniero, J.; dissent by LaVecchia, J.; decided July 9, 2003. On appeal from the Appellate Division, 353 N.J. Super. 600 (App.

    1 minute read

  • December 20, 1999 |

    No Mental Exam for Mom in Dependency Case

    Parents cannot be forced to undergo a mental health exam as part of dependency proceedings, the Superior Court has ruled. The case is apparently the first such case to be decided by the Supe

    1 minute read

  • March 19, 2012 | The American Lawyer

    ITC Judge Invalidates Rambus Patents for Prior Art, Calling Former Executives "Dishonest"

    Rambus has taken a lot of losses in its litigation against semiconductor industry rivals. The latest hit came on Friday, when a International Trade Commission judge called former Rambus execs

    1 minute read

  • Lititz Mutual Insurance Co. v. Steely

    Publication Date: 2001-12-10
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-11-30
    Court: Pa. Sup. Ct.
    Judge: Mr. Justice Saylor
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 116 MAP 2000, 11

    ARGUED: April 30, 2001OPINIONThe issue to be decided is whether a pollution exclusion clause in a commercial general liability insurance policy precludes coverage for injuries allegedly caused b