• People v. Fleury

    Publication Date: 2010-03-22
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-03-19
    Court: C.A. 3rd
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Attorney General, Dane R. Gillette, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Michael P. Farrell, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Julie A. Hokans, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, Jeffrey A. White, Deputy Attorney General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
    for defendant: Barbara Ann Smith, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.

    Case Number: No. C061629

    Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 3537THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v.CLAUDINE FLEURY, Defendant and Appellant.

  • Cicchetti v. Davis, 07 Civ. 10546

    Publication Date: 2009-04-13
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2009-04-06
    Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number:

    District Judge William C. Conner U.S. DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Appearances: Attorneys for Plaintiff: Jonathan Lovett,

  • May 5, 2003 | New York Law Journal

    CLE: "The Art of Managing a Small Firm or Solo Law Practice," 6 p.m., Rex Manor, 1100 60th Street, Brooklyn. For information: (718) 875-0158.New York State Bar Association

    1 minute read

  • Taylor v. State

    Publication Date: 2008-10-31
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2008-10-29
    Court: Tex. Crim. App.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: PD-1370-07

    Price, J., delivered the opinion of the Court in which Meyers, Johnson, Holcomb and Cochran, JJ., joined. Womack, J., filed a concurring opinion in which Keller, P.J., and Keasler and Hervey, JJ., joi

  • Baribeau v. City of Minneapolis

    Publication Date: 2010-02-25
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-02-24
    Court: 8th Cir.
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 08-3165

    PUBLISHEDSubmitted: June 9, 2009Before COLLOTON, JOHN R. GIBSON, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.Jessica Baribeau, Jamie Jones, Kate Kibby, Kyle Kibby, Raphi Rechitski, Jake Sternberg, and Christian

  • Montoya v. Nichirin-Flex U.S.A., Inc.

    Publication Date: 2013-08-20
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2013-08-07
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 8
    Judge: ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 08-12-00070-CV

    Appeal from 120th District Court of El Paso County, Texas (TC # 2011-DCV-10027) Before McClure,

  • United States of America v. Steven Warshak

    Publication Date: 2010-12-19
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-12-14
    Court: 6th Cir.
    Judge: Boggs, Circuit Judge.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: (08-3997/4085, 09-3176),, (08-3997/4087/4429),, (08-3997/4212)

    Nos. 08-3997/4085/4087/ 4212/4429; 09-3176RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATIONPursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206File Name: 10a0377p.06Argued: June 16, 2010Before: KEITH, BOGGS, and McK

  • Jones v. Goord

    Publication Date: 2006-06-07
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District
    Judge: Gerard Lynch
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number:

    U.S. DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Judge Lynch In this class action, plaintiffs challenge New York State's administration of a program for double-cellin

  • September 27, 2013 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Unapproved Opinions

    STATE COURT CASES ADMINISTRATIVE LAW — CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION 0

    1 minute read

  • Hufford v. McEnaney

    Publication Date: 2001-05-23
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-05-22
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge: Harry Pregerson, Sidney R. Thomas and Ronald M. Gould, Circuit Judges
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: No. 99-36041

    The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion. THOMAS, Circuit Judge: Brad Hufford alleges that the defendants violated his clearly established First Amendment