Filter This View

  • Herbolsheimer v. S.M.S. Holding Co., Inc.

    Publication Date: 2000-01-04
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2000-01-04
    Court: State Of Michigan Court Of Appeals
    Judge: MARKMAN, HOEKSTRA, and ZAHRA
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: No. 204631

    The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion.MARKMAN, P.J. This case presents a question of first impression in Michigan. We are asked to decide

  • Idaho v. United States

    Publication Date: 2001-06-18
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-06-18
    Court: U.S. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATESNo. 00-189 IDAHO, PETITIONER v. UNITED STATES et al.ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT[June 18, 2

  • August 4, 2003 | National Law Journal

    Verdicts & Settlements

    ANTITRUST Firms who overpaid for additive get $49 million in a conspiracy lawsuit against four producers and traders of animal-feed additives, a class of companies that c

    1 minute read

  • Wiener v Wiener

    Publication Date: 2008-12-04
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, 1st Dept
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 4737

    Mazzarelli, J.P., Friedman, Gonzalez, Buckley, Sweeny, JJ. 4737 Index 350396/04 Susan Wiener, Plaintiff-Respondent-Appellant, v Jack Wiener, Defendant-Appell

  • In re B.R.

    Publication Date: 2010-05-28
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-05-26
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 4
    Judge: Karen Angelini, Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 04-09-00362-CV

    OPINIONDissenting opinion by: Steven C. Hilbig, JusticeSitting: Karen Angelini, Justice, Steven C. Hilbig, Justice, Marialyn Barnard, Justice.AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED AND REMANDED IN PARTp

  • Harris v State of New York

    Publication Date: 2007-01-16
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, 2nd Dept
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    PRUDENTI, P.J., MASTRO, FISHER and LUNN, JJ. Gerald Harris, appellant, v State of New York, respondent. (Claim No. 105724) APPEAL by the claimant, in a claim

  • Altman v. New York City Department of Education, 06 Civ. 6319

    Publication Date: 2007-12-26
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2007-12-12
    Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District
    Judge: Harold Baer
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 06 Civ. 6319

    District Judge Harold Baer U.S. DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Judge Baer Plaintiff pro se Hui Zhang Altman ("Plaintiff" or "Altman") filed a

  • Mojica v. Fischer

    Publication Date: 2005-09-23
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    U.S. DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Judge Holwell On October 23, 1996, following a jury trial in New York State Supreme Court, Bronx County, Rafael Mojic

  • In re Pelfrey,

    Publication Date: 2009-11-16
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2009-11-09
    Court: 6th Cir.
    Judge: Steven Rhodes, Bankruptcy Appellate Panel Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 09-8019

    Argued: August 18, 2009Before: BOSWELL, RHODES, and SHEA-STONUM, Bankruptcy Appellate Panel Judges.OPINIONIn this appeal, J. James Rogan, the trustee, appeals an order of the bankruptcy court

  • Conway v. Circus Circus Casinos, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2000-09-25
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2000-09-15
    Court: Nev. Sup. Ct.
    Judge: Young, Agosti, and Leavitt, JJ.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: William M. O'Mara
    for defendant: Robison Belaustegui
    Case Number: 32705

    The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion.O P I N I O NPER CURIAM:The question in this case is whether the claims contained in the appellants' second amen