Filter This View

  • New York City Health and Hospitals Corp. v. Spectrum Medical Leasing

    Publication Date: 2004-04-22
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    U.S. District Court Southern District of New York Judge Carter In July 2003, Petitioner New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation ("HHC") petitioned filed a Petit

  • Kings County Second Department SUPREME COURT,

    Publication Date: 2012-03-06
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court:
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    Justice Jack A. Battaglia3916 103rd St. Inc. v. Rosario Gangi And 755 (39926/07)—Motion WithdrawnElbaz v. Rizzardi (20055/10)—Granted Sh

  • October 12, 2012 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Daily Decision Service Alert: Vol. 21, No. 200 – October 12, 2012

    STATE COURT CASES CIVIL PROCEDURE — SUBSTITUTED PARTIES07-2-7950 Struss v. Hilly, App. Div. (per curiam) (7

    1 minute read

  • People v Vargas

    Publication Date: 2009-03-26
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, 3rd Dept
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 100367

    Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Third Judicial Department Decided and Entered: March 26, 2009 100367 THE PEOPL

  • In re Labatt Food Service, L.P.

    Publication Date: 2009-02-17
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2009-02-13
    Court: Tx. Sup. Ct.
    Judge: Justice Johnson
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 07-0419

    ONPETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUSArgued September 9, 2008Under Texas law, wrongful death beneficiaries are generally bound by a decedent's pre-death contractual agreement because of the derivative

  • United States v. Lee

    Publication Date: 2009-01-26
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2008-12-03
    Court: 2nd Cir.
    Judge: Haight, District Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: Docket Nos. 05-1684-cr (L), 05-6851-cr (Con)

    Argued September 25, 2008Before: STRAUB, HALL, Circuit Judges, HAIGHT, *fn1 District Judge. Judge Straub concurs in part and dissents in part in a separate opinion

  • Borough Of Berlin v. Remington & Vernick Engineers

    Publication Date: 2001-03-13
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-03-12
    Court: N.J. Super. App. Div.
    Judge: Lefelt, J.A.D.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A-3297-99T1

    NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISIONArgued February 15, 2001Plaintiff Borough of Berlin sued defendant Remington & Vernick Engineers ("R&V") for negligence

  • Fluke Corp. v. Hartford Accident & Cas. Co.

    Publication Date: 2001-11-28
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-11-21
    Court: Wash. Sup. Ct.
    Judge: Judge OWENS, J.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: No. 70519-4

    The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion. OWENS, J. -- The Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company (Hartford)challenges the decision of the Court of Appeals

  • Durden v. State

    Publication Date: 2009-05-18
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2009-04-24
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 6
    Judge: Jack Carter Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 06-08-00223-CR

    Date Decided: May 15, 2009Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.Dissenting Opinion by Justice MoseleyOPINIONIn his version of the circumstances leading to his arrest, Lavern Tchefun

  • In re Collins

    Publication Date: 2009-06-09
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2009-06-05
    Court: Tx. Sup. Ct.
    Judge: Justice O'neill
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 07-0737

    ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUSArgued November 12, 2008In this mandamus proceeding, we must decide whether the trial court abused its discretion by granting a protective order barring the defen