Filter This View

  • New York County First Department SUPREME COURT,

    Publication Date: 2012-02-27
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court:
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    Justice Eileen BranstenIntercos America, Inc. v. Identity Cosmetics (650066/11)—Motion Disposed As IndicatedProspect Mortgage v. Titleserv, Inc. (

  • February 11, 2010 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Reinstatement of Attorneys From the 2009 Pro Hac Vice Ineligible List

    The New Jersey Lawyers' Fund For Client Protection declares that the following attorneys, having fully satisfied the requirements of Rule 1:28-2, are eligible to appear pro hac vice in New Jersey

    1 minute read

  • October 5, 2001 | The American Lawyer

    Doubling Down

    In the background, slot machines rattle and ring and gamblers crowd around the roulette and craps tables. A blackjack dealer silently doles out his last card and awaits the player's next call.

    1 minute read

  • Valle del Sol Incorporated v. Whiting

    Publication Date: 2013-03-04
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2013-03-04
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge: Before: Raymond C. Fisher, Richard C. Tallman and Consuelo M. Callahan, Circuit Judges.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Thomas A. Saenz, Victor Viramontes (argued) and Nicholás Espíritu, Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Los Angeles, California; Omar C. Jadwat and Andre Segura, American Civil Liberties Union Foundation Immigrants' Rights Project, New York, New York; Linton Joaquin, Karen C. Tumlin, Nora A. Preciado, Melissa S. Keaney and Álvaro M. Huerta, National Immigration Law Center, Los Angeles, California; Nina Perales, Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund, San Antonio, Texas; Chris Newman and Lisa Kung, National Day Labor Organizing Network, Los Angeles, California; Marita Etcubañez and Jessica Chia, Asian American Justice Center, Washington, D.C.; Cecillia D. Wang, American Civil Liberties Union Foundation Immigrants' Rights Project, San Francisco, California; Daniel J. Pochoda and James Duff Lyall, ACLU Foundation of Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona; Daniel R. Ortega, Ortega Law Firm, P.C., Phoenix, Arizona; Yungsuhn Park, Connie Choi and Carmina Ocampo, Asian Pacific American Legal Center, a member of Asian American Center for Advancing Justice, Los Angeles, California, for Appellees. Aaron Leiderman, Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP, San Francisco, California; Bradley S. Phillips, Joseph J. Ybarra, Benjamin J. Maro, Lika C. Miyake and Margaret G. Ziegler, Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP, Los Angeles, California, for all Appellees except Maria Morales and Service Employees International Union, Service Employees International Union, Local 5, United Food and Commercial Workers International Union and Japanese American Citizens League. Stephen P. Berzon and Jonathan Weissglass, Altshuler Berzon LLP, San Francisco, California, for Appellees Service Employees International Union, Service Employees International Union, Local 5 and United Food and Commercial Workers International Union.
    for defendant: John J. Bouma, Robert A. Henry (argued) and Kelly A. Kszywienski, Snell & Wilmer L.L.P., Phoenix, Arizona; Joseph Sciarrotta, Jr., Office of Governor Janice K. Brewer, Phoenix, Arizona, for Appellants. Thomas C. Horne, Attorney General, Michael Tryon, Senior Litigation Counsel, and Evan Hiller, Assistant Attorney General, Phoenix, Arizona, for Appellant State of Arizona.
    Case Number: No. 12-15688

    Cite as 13 C.D.O.S. 2295hr width="50%" size="1" color="black" ali

  • February 24, 2003 | Texas Lawyer

    Top 10 Texas Plaintiffs Verdicts in 2002

    Editor's note: The following are the top 10 Texas verdict summaries of 2002, according to The National Law Journal, an affiliate of Texas Lawyer. The verdicts are ranked by dollar amo

    1 minute read

  • December 13, 2011 | Daily Business Review

    On Appeal: Confidentiality agreement's sharing provision caused irreparable harm to Wal-Mart

    Case: Wal-Mart Stores East v. Endicott Case no.: 1D11-3568 Topic: Evidence Opinion Issued: Dec. 9, 2011 Court: 1st District Court of Appeal Authoring Judge: Judge

    1 minute read

  • Bronx County First Department SUPREME COURT,

    Publication Date: 2011-09-15
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court:
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    Justice Ben R. BarbatoLee v. Rossiter Jr. (300388/09)—Motion DeniedLee v. Rossiter Jr. (300388/09)—Motion GrantedLee v. Rossiter Jr. (3

  • Michael William Potter, Jr., Plaintiff v. Michael Astrue, Comm'r of Soc. Sec., Defendant, 5:11-CV-1427

    Publication Date: 2013-02-26
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U. S. District Court, Northern District
    Judge: District Judge Glenn Suddaby
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Counsel for Plaintiff: P. Michael Shanley, Esq., of Counsel, Shanley Law Offices, Mexico, NY.
    for defendant: Counsel for Defendant: Monika K. Proctor, Esq., of Counsel, U.S. Social Security Admin. Office Of Reg'l Gen. Counsel-Region II, New York, NY.
    Case Number: 5:11-CV-1427

    Cite as: Potter v. Astrue, 5:11-CV-1427, NYLJ 1202589224478, at *1 (NDNY, Decided February 15, 2013)District Judge Glenn SuddabyDec

  • November 3, 2009 | The American Lawyer

    McDermott's China Alliance Forges On, but Rivals Question Long-Term Viability

    In January 2007, McDermott Will & Emery announced a groundbreaking deal that created an allied Chinese law fi

    1 minute read

  • March 13, 2006 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Bankruptcies

    U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of New Jersey a/k/a OFF SHORES PIES 2, PO BOX 609, GREEN CREEK; Chap. 7; liab. & assets not listed; atty. LAW OFFICES OF ALAN I. GOULD; 09/07; BK-0

    1 minute read