Filter This View

  • Pacific Bell Telephone Company v. Southern California Edison Company

    Publication Date: 2012-08-31
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-08-30
    Court: C.A. 2nd
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: AT&T Services Legal Department and Gleam O. Davis for Plaintiff and Respondent.
    for defendant: Munger, Tolles & Olson, Henry Weissmann, Paul J. Watford, Leo Goldbard; Southern California Edison Company and Brian A. Cardoza for Defendant and Appellant.
    Case Number: No. B230470

    Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 10198 PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA

  • Thompson v. State

    Publication Date: 2001-10-25
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-10-24
    Court: Tex. Crim. App.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NO. 73,431

    ON DIRECT APPEAL FROM HARRIS COUNTYMEYERS, j., delivered the opinion of the Court, joined by Price, Womack, Johnson and Holcomb. Keller, P.J., filed a dissenting opinion, joined by Keasler, Hervey

  • March 20, 2006 | Texas Lawyer

    Hyundai Motor Co. v. Vasquez

    Click here for the full text of this decisionFACTS: Four-year-old Amber Vasquez died in a low-spee

    1 minute read

  • October 10, 2007 | New York Law Journal

    Shifting Ground

    One day, Pluto is a planet. The next day, it isn't. One day, most of us in the title industry believed that a deed is "recorded" when it appears in the indices maintained by the county clerk o

    1 minute read

  • July 16, 2010 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Unpublished Opinions

    July 8 to 14, 2010 STATE COURT CASES ADMINISTRATIVE LAW — HEALTH BENEFITS 01-2-8593 In the Matter of H.S. , App. Div. (per curiam) (8 pp.) H.S. appeals from

    1 minute read

  • McCarthy v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority

    Publication Date: 2001-04-12
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-04-10
    Court: Pa. Super. Ct.
    Judge: Johnson, J.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 733 EDA 2000

    J. A53012/00�1 In this appeal, we re-examine when a trial court has the authority to sanction counsel based on the Pennsylvania Rules of Professional Conduct. We conclude that a trial court can san